Firstly, unlike AMD, Intel does and will have competitive processors for the high-end desktop CPU market. Small delay means nothing for their financial results or image among end-users.

Secondly, Bulldozer has been delayed for several times already, unlike Ivy Bridge.

Thirdly, AMD did say that the desktop Zambezi was due in Q2 2011 and server Valencia/Interlagos were set to arrive in Q3 2011.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/n...r_Chip_at_Conference.html

AMD originally expected to start shipments of Bulldozer in 2010, not in the second half of 2011: http://www.xbitlabs.com/n...ples_Due_in_2009_AMD.html

Yeah right. AMD has 3 brand new archictectures launching this year and 2 of them are already a great success. Intel does a minor speed bump on nehalem, loses half of their netbook market to bobcat and then messes the IB launch and all you can do is have a go at AMD for one arch that hasn't gone perfectly.

You know what they say, 2 out of 3 aint bad.

You're really not calling Sandy Bridge a minor speed bump on Nehalem, are you? No one is that stupid. Or are they?

Sandy Bridge is a completely new microarchitecture. It's pipelines are redone from the ground up, and it's got a lot of Pentium 4 in it, not the least of which is the Physical Register File, and a new type of trace cache.

Nehalem is the last of the Pentium Pro line. Sandy Bridge is a new architecture.

Having said that, I like Bobcat, and anyone who thought Bulldozer was going to compete on a thread level with Sandy Bridge was an idiot anyway. It doesn't have to, to be successful. It will be very cost/power effective with integer apps with many threads, but it will not compete in single threaded performance.

What are the three architectures? I know that Bulldozer and Bobcat are the two brand-new micro-architectures that are released this year.

Bulldozer was due in 2009 - 2010 timeframe.
Bobcat was due in 2008 - 2009 timeframe (http://www.xbitlabs.com/n...splay/20070608225159.html).

Llano, an interesting chip design with outdated K10.5+ micro-architecture, was originally scheduled for release in early 2011 (http://www.xbitlabs.com/n...duction_in_Late_2010.html), not mid-2011.

What I really don't know is how to "measure" the success of Bulldozer, Bobcat and Llano, provided that only Bobcat has been released so far commercially?

Jesus you are really pedantic aren't you. If you are going to hark back to 2008 and 2009 why not go write a article on how Larrabee is late but "coming soon". Or are you only pedantic when it comes to AMD?

And really don't even try to convince anyone that Llano isn't a far more ambitious step than SB was.

"while AMD only ever said 2011 for BD. Get your shit together Shilov." jimbo75

The SSE5 specification, which is being made available to the developer community today at http://developer.amd.com/SSE5, will be implemented in products based on AMD’s next-generation “Bulldozer” core, available in 2009.

http://www.amd.com/us/pre...Press_Release_119091.aspx

Seems the ones who have to get their act together is AMD and jimbo...

When I am accused of bribing and asked to get my "shit straight", there are two options for me:

- ban you and delete your account without any further ado.

- show you that you don't know the facts.

I chose the second option and it looks like you really do not know all the facts surrounding various chips.

Larrabee as we know it is dead. It is officially admitted. Just like AMD's Swift, Montreal, etc.

Llano and Sandy Bridge are comparable. Llano has relatively new GPU core and old CPU cores, whereas Sandy Bridge has old GPU core and new CPU cores.

Lol swift and montreal now as well? Why not just keep going back Shilov, then we can talk about Netburst and Itanium. Why not just go all the way back to intels FDIV? Or did you want to stop at 2007 because that suits your agenda more?

Itanium makes more money than AMD's whole server business. So I guess you mean AMD's server products are a failure as a whole.

BTW instead of trying to figure it out while we both throw AMD and intels failures at each other, the point is you chose to single out AMD for criticism when both have had many faults over the past few years.

The second point - the financial one - is even more bullshit. Bulldozer would only be worth 10% revenue to AMD in 2011 had it been released this month, so lets say that's down to 5% worse case. Ok they lose $300m, not really because they will just flog more X6's they have in inventory but still, it's a small loss overall.

How much more do you think intel is set to lose with a 3 month delay (at least) on ALL of their products slower crossover to 22nm? It's a lot more than what AMD is set to lose and that's for sure.

Drop your websites negative slant on all things AMD.

Intel will loose much less with the 3month delay than AMD's 2 year delay of bulldozer caused them or the last 5 years straight in red.

At least Intel still owns it's fabs.

Yeah that's why it's desperately trying to hawk supply to apple and others. It won't be long before a lot of those fabs are sitting empty.

What you do not know is that prior to acquisition of ATI, AMD planned to aggressively expand its production capacities and considered making chips for others in order to keep them busy...

BTW. Intel not only plans to make some custom chips for others, but also hopes to expand its product lineup further to address emerging markets like smartphones, tablets and other new form-factors.

I suggest you really should start reading various news-stories at this and other web-sites before trying to argue or criticize.

No offence but if I wanted actual news this would be the last place I'd visit. If I wanted to read pro-spintel propaganda I'll make sure to keep you bookmarked though.

I heard it already so many times that Intel will be destroyed by AMD... and look who got bought up by an investment group.

When Intel fails to deliver products on time or at all, it receives its amount of criticism.

The problem is that 60 day Ivy Bridge delay from January to March is less important for Intel than another 90 days delay of Bulldozer for AMD.

The reason is obvious. AMD's server business is going down. AMD's most expensive desktop chip today costs $205. The most expensive FX chip was supposed to cost $320. Have you ever heard of profit margins? Do you understand why AMD is not profitable?

I can go back as far as Intel Timna and imply that this was supposed to be the first x86 APU...



Enlighten us, please! With actual numbers. Just keep in mind that by the end of 2012 the company will have five fabs producing chips at 22nm, which will speed up transition to 22nm in general.

AMD IS profitable FYI, maybe you should check the recent financials?

Then how about aking a look at the last 5 years as a whole ?

It shows profitability because it either receives payments from Intel, sells its stock in Globalfoundries or receives other kind of payments.

Otherwise, the company either shows minimum profits or is not profitable.

So, did you count how much money will Intel lose by delaying desktop Ivy Bridge chips by 60 days? Did you count how many quarters will it take Intel to transit its major products to 22nm given the fact that it will have 22nm fabs by late 2012?

And what was the reason for those payments from intel? Do you even understand that the reason AMD had such a torrid time was precisely because of the crap intel pulled?

When you are busy lauding intel's profits did you count the $5 billion spent on bribing Dell?

Or the many billions spent on fines?

Or the billions wasted on Larrabee?

Or the $8 billion on McAfee? That will take 4 years to pay off at current levels assuming nothing goes wrong that is.

No I guess not. And no I cant be arsed figuring out how much money intel will lose because of the IB delay, but it's more than what AMD will lose on the BD delay for sure. A lot more.

Wrong again.

The 2 year delay for bulldozer pushed AMD's whole lineup under 200$ and their server market share under 10%. Intel makes 25% more on Itanium than AMD's whole server business thanks to this massive delay.

The past 5 years of continuous losses had nothing to do with dell intel.
Leaky 65nm, badly executed over hyped K10, not being able to match Conroe performance for years, are the main reasons.

Intel has spent more on fines and bribes in the past 7 than AMD has lost in its entire 42 year history. As far as wasting cash on useless projects goes, it's far ahead of AMD's cash losses.

That's how "awesome" a company intel is. It wastes more money that it puts to good use.

Then it's probably just a coincidence most big warehouses still sell only or mainly Intel-based PC's, even in those sectors AMD provides a competitive or even a better alternative?

Also, it costed them a fortune to buy ATI, which is turning into a good business only by now.

It is profitable even without those payments, since more than a year.

They even (Intel) have said 2011Q4 lately...

Really?...Fanboy!

Don't we all wish for AMD to be more competitive?

Sandy Bridge has a larger IPC advantage over Phenom II. Add to that Intel's mature 32nm process that allows their 2600k to overclock well into 4.8ghz, and even more competition coming in from SB-E LGA2011 socket, and AMD is in a tough spot. The main draw of AMD's new processors will likely be cheap mobo bundles and those users who absolutely need to use 8 threads for rendering/encoding etc. I can see BD beating SB in multi-threaded tasks.

But even then Ivy Bridge may still beat BD should AMD have any chance at competing with SB. So AMD will still be 2nd best.

Well, The FX-51 was "only" $600 or so when it came out, right? AMD desktop chips didn't officially hit the $1K mark until FX-57 or FX60 IIRC. $320 sounds rather sweet by comparison.

That one wasn't the same chip as the new one. That one used a 45nm process, the new one is for 32nm. Also, there can be substantial changes to the developed microarchitecture.

You are just trying to justify the delay.
Instead of 2 years it takes 4 for AMD to release their next uarch...

Justifying or not justifying, I'm just saying that what they wanted to launch two years ago is not the same thing they will launch by now, and probably this one is as much the better as more the time it needed to develop, not mentioning it's 32nm, which is an advantage in itself.

Do you think Intel have built SB from scratch?

500 MHz hasn't been 40% of most CPU's clock speed since PIII. The Phenom II X4 980 performs as well as the Core i7 960 without HyperThreading. With HyperThreading a better match for the X4 980 is probably the i5 760. They're priced about the same and they're both old mid-range products so PLEASE intel fanboys don't come over yelling "haha AMD can barely compete with a two year old Core i5" because you'll all be crying when the 4 GHz STOCK AMD Zambezi FX (Bulldozer) 8150P octo-core CPU comes out.

"you'll all be crying when the 4 GHz STOCK AMD Zambezi FX (Bulldozer) 8150P octo-core CPU comes out."

And I'd bet a dollar that a 3.4 ghz i7 6 core would monster it. It's been the trend for a few years now. You need a 3.9 ghz Phenom II x4 to compete with a stock i7 920. I like AMD as much as the next guy, but AMD isn't going to somehow leap ahead 4 steps with Bulldozer to beat Intel.

Are you aware that the Bulldozer is a brand new microarchitecture? So, better not to base your expectations on Phenom II's (which is basically an enhanced Athlon64 with more cores). Yes, they can do it, provided it reaces the indended clockrates, which it should, sooner or later.

It's sad/funny how some posts are, like this one. You discredit AMD with this type of post.

Bulldozer IS NOT intended to compete head on with Sandy Bridge in single threaded performance. AMD knew they couldn't win that battle, so made Bulldozer with an eye on performance per watt on threaded applications that did mostly integer.

So, stop whining, because AMD will not beat Sandy Bridge, and it doesn't have to. But, it will perform well enough for most people, and if you've got something needing 8 threads, and AMD 4 module/8 integer core unit is going to offer you a solution perfectly suited for your application. Or even a four thread. Intel can throw in a big four core unit, or hyper thread a 2-core, but the former is bigger/more power hungry, the latter will not perform as well, as the AMD unit.

Absolute performance is NOT the end all. Bulldozer will lose that battle, but will win in other areas, and that's fine for AMD. They win at nothing now in that market.

Also, despite these clock speeds, you should expect the Bulldozer to clock higher than Sandy Bridge based on the design. AMD designed this chip for high clock speeds, and when they work out all the warts, it should clock quite high.

Note that Sandy Bridge got its high single-thread performance out of turbo (f.ex. substantially higher clock when only one core is working hard). A thing the BD also has - with even higher clockrates!

Did you forget the problems with long pipe lines with the p4???? I think you did. Any person that says having a higher clock rate and that higher clock rate is because of longer pipelines, just like the P4 disaster. Those persons are "DUMB ASS'S"

AFAIK the long pipes wasn't the problem, but the high clocks at 90+nm. Just look at the Cell BE that can be clocked at 5 GHz at 32nm. Anyway,
AFAIK BD has shorter pipes, and it's not the longness of the pipes that allows for the high clocks here, but other clever design techniques.

Do you have any credible sources to back your claims up??? I was just wondering, because i want to know.

No, not miracle just technology and creativity, moreover courage.

GaMEChld is a unreliable source of info, an abuser & a liar. The rating system says it all.

Lol, I hope you enjoy what happens to Intel CPU prices if AMD folds. Short sighted moron.

In the USA its illegal to have a monopoly DUMB FUCK!!! Who's a "Short sighted moron"??? You are... Dumb Bitch!!!

How eloquent. And I suppose there is some law that states what minimum market share AMD can attain? What are you saying? If AMD's market share reaches 1%, they have zero budget for R&D, and can make no more architectural changes, what will happen? The US gov't is going to step in and bail them out? Despite having large ownership stakes held by Abu Dabi? Maybe I should just stop with all that and simply reply in your fashion. DUMB FUCK!!!!! DUMB BITCH!!!! LOLOLLOL:OL!!!!!oneoneoneelven

In my first reply to you GaMEChld, i didn't mention anything about

"what might happen to Intel CPU prices if AMD folds" you did that all on your own.

I was just saying "In the USA its illegal to have a monopoly DUMB FUCK!!!"

"The DUMB FUCK & Dumb bitch part was my response to your "Short sighted moron" remark."

This just proves my point GaMEChld. You are a "DUMBFUCK" since i had to explain it to you in laymen terms.

You started it first, don't expect people to roll over, dumb cunt

You wouldn't know what "eloquent" is, if it hit you straight in the face.

"GaMEChld" your user name fits you just well.

An immature shithead, that doesn't know how to even spell. Just look at the username "GaMEChld" & Abu Dabi. I bet his last post was spelled checked too... lol

Abu Dabi is spelled "Abu Dhabi... Can you say "Loser"

"LLLLLLoooooosssssseeeeeerrrrrr" Is that slow enough for you??? GaMEChld: Nods his head no.

If you are going to use curse words, at least know how to use them for gods sake man! You made yourself look like a dumb ass trying to copy me GaMEChld.

GaMEChld:"What are you saying?"

"In the USA its illegal to have a monopoly"

All i have heard from you is "what if statements"

"MEANINGLESS BULLSHIT" Trying to start something, looking more & more like a "fucktard"

The only thing that i have learn from your post, that you are just an uneducated sad little person, with small man syndrome, self esteem problems, and maybe anger management issues too.

With you mentioning Abu Dabi GaMEChld. It Proves that you are a douche.

Abu Dhabi->"Advanced Technology Investment" Has a 55.6% equity stake in AMD fabricating factories.
Abu Dhabi investment arm, "Mubadala Development" has a 19.4% stake in AMD.
http://www.businessweek.c...2008/tc2008107_998689.htm

If you call 19.4% a "large ownership stake"
You are, the "Short sighted moron"

If "Advanced Technology Investment" owns more of a stake in AMD. That would be new news to me.

If anyone knows of this "New News". I want to know about it!

prerequisites for this "New News":
1.cited from a reputable source.
2.URL Cited.

Here's some facts for ass GaMEChld...

1.Their are more Intel CPUs in use compared AMD CPUs.
AMD:25%ish
Intel:75%ish
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/market_share.html

2.Intel finished 2010 with 81.0% revenue share, which was up 0.4 points from 80.6% in 2009, while AMD was down 0.8 points to 11.4%.
http://www.tomshardware.c...athlon-pentium,12460.html

3. Intel Core i5 2500/2400 vs AMD bulldozer FX 8120 in handbrake.
AMD: 19% Faster than i5
http://lenzfire.com/2011/...ore-i7-980x-i5-2500-2500/

4. Intel Core i7 980X vs AMD bulldozer FX 8120 in Dirt 3.
AMD: 2.3 % Faster than i7
http://lenzfire.com/2011/...ore-i7-980x-i5-2500-2500/

5.Bulldozer is not meant to compete with neither Core i7 second generation Sandy Bridge processors nor the upcoming Sandy Bridge-E processors.
http://lenzfire.com/2011/...ore-i7-980x-i5-2500-2500/

Which proves my point from another post.
"I can't wait for the benchmarks to be revealed for AMD Bulldozer, wait AMD BULLSHIT."

A couple more things GaMEChld. You don't know jack shit GaMEChld, & and i can't do jackshit to make AMD's situation better.

So GaMEChld, STOP trying to place AMD's poor predicament on other people, and shove it up your ASS!!!

In laymen terms "SHUT THE FUCK UP"

Someone needs to get a life How long did you spend writing that, rofl. You want to claim that other people are starting conflicts while I see you repeatedly addressing any AMD user as a "poorAMDfag" all over this website. You are the "DUMBFUCK," sir, not I. Learn some manners. All I initially expressed was a displeasure at the news of this article. You then replied to me with your ill tempered fanboyism, and then, as if you were a woman with increasing amounts of sand in your vagina, continued to get more and more beligerent. Calm down, or you'll have a stroke.

You do GaMEChld. Just look at the date stamp from your "what if amd folds bullshit" 09/14/11, and "my poorAMDfag" statement 06/02/11. 3 months after the fact! What, you can't let go of a insignificant remark?
I guess you can't, because you do not have a life. How pathetic GaMEChld.


It took just a few minutes, I have most of my news categorized & bookmark.


They do, even though my claims are back up with hard cold facts. Take this thread for instance.


How the hell do i know if they are an AMD user??? I'm not god, I don't know them. I do know this, I know you are an AMD "user & fanboy" from your statements on this website.


Wheres your facts to back your shit up GaMEChld??? I WANT TO KNOW THE URLS!!!


Do you have proof to back that shit up??? You still don't know how to use cuss words properly douche!!! I proved you are the "DUMBFUCK" when i had to correct you about Abu Dhabi & educate you more on who actually owns some stakes in AMD. Here's a reminder if you forgot FUCKER.





Again If you call 19.4% a "large ownership stake"
You are, the "Short sighted moron"


Frankly i don't give a fuck about you, your fanboy's, and anyone elses' opinions, when it comes to manners. Someone with real manners wouldn't have use dumbfuck, they would have used something more sophisticated, like AMENTIA. And you call your self eloquent, your a dumb ass GaMEChld. I rather be my own boss, than be someone else's bitch.


You don't know anything about me, FUCKTARD. "SO SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY".


What the fuck... who are you rooting for??? One of your friends that is "your" buttpirate, or is it that your gender confused and don't know what the fuck your talking about.

Which proves my point. DUMBFUCK+FUCKTARD+poorAMDfag+DOUCHE+MORON=GaMEChld

Lol, just so you know, I am not even bothering to take the time to read through your long drawn out posts. I find it so amusing that you are so angry. Furious furious fanboy RAWR! So angry about CPU's!!! INTEL FANBOY SMASH!!! What a loser.

Btw though, I did see you ask for some URL's for proof of your beligerence.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/n...ature_Adjustable_TDP.html

http://www.xbitlabs.com/discussion/59041.html

http://www.xbitlabs.com/n...r_to_Cost_320_Report.html

Simple Google search of 'Xbitlabs poorAMDfags' reveals multiple articles with you and your clone accounts using that insult. So yeah... Loser.

I don't have any clone accounts, only macintoshci. Where's your shit proving that i have "clone accounts".

You don't have any Dumbfuck, also again i don't have "clone accounts".

1.The first url that has any "poorAMDfags" remarks is by quad840, I have no fucking idea who that is. Try again fucktard.

2.The second url DOESN'T HAVE MY USERNAME "macintoshci". Look through your "shit" first, before posting, douche.

3. The third url has the "poorAMDfag" remark twice. One was from me directing it at you shithead. The other was from quad 840. Short-sight moron.

When i've posted their & here. I know without a doubt that your are a AMD fan boy "poorAMDfag".



What users besides you GaMEChld "poorAMDfag". I want to know. Really i do want to know who!

I don't give shit if people think i need manners they all can stick it up their ass.

Hey loser "GaMEChld", Try harder next time.

OH! to set you straight poorAMDfag "GaMEChld" for your personal vendetta on my "fan boy-ism". I'm an AMD Gnome, Intel Troll, Powerpc Freak, Apple freak Arm soldier; and you GaMEChld, you are always going to be a "poorAMDfag".

DUMBFUCK+FUCKTARD+poorAMDfag+LAZYASS+DOUCHE+MORON=GaMEChld

Sure, I believe you. That guy "Bro" isn't you, he just happens to use the same insult capitalized in the same exact way. Also, Macintoshfx isn't you either. He's just another user that happened to post adjacent to you within minutes of your post, both of which was more insults. Yupyup, no clones, I agree.

Try again loser.

I also like how your rating is skyrocketing, you must have quite the following! I mean, its not like ur using clone accounts to upvote yourself and downvote me right? People must be following this fight between us with great vigil on a 4 month old article!

Rofl, its obvious you noob troll, we all know what you're doing. So sad.

And just fyi, I buy both AMD and Intel products. And I am not poor. I'd be impressed if your computer was more expensive than mine. poorINTELfag

DUMB+SHIT+SMELLY+UGLY+GARBAGE+DOGSHIT+IMBECILE+ASSFACE+MUNG=FAGINTOSHCI

Wow, using nonsensical formulas makes me seem so smart!

Idiot.

Peace out, I'm done talking to you because I've accomplished my goal. Exposing your flagrant fagmastery! LOLOL LOOK AT THE VOTES, WE ARE SO POPULAR!

umadbro? u so madddd!

What to think....

ROFL, All talk and no hard cold facts. He didn't prove anything, what a douche.

Just like a worthless BITCH, moaning & bitching about nothing. Just look at the start of this, and you would know what i mean...

My Commentary on GaMEChld last comment.



I've seen similar user names before. Who fucking cares! I don't...



I guess GaMEChld hasn't heard about copy & paste yet, I actually got my "poorAMDfag" remark from quad840 from this article http://www.xbitlabs.com/n...r_to_Cost_320_Report.html Compare the date stamps. Talk about dumbfuck.



What the fuck??? It doesn't has to do with anything. I do not have "Clone accounts" in the first place, dumb cunt.



If you look at the comment count I have more than GaMEChld. GaMEChld=35 minus 2(hint:Just look at his profile) macintoshci=116. No surprise their.



I DON'T GIVE FUCK.



FUCKTARD!!! not when you are copying another person.



GaMEChld looks like a DUMFUCK. Be original Fucker.

If you think about it... Shit, dogshit, garbage, smelly, and mung lol, all go together. IMBECILE, and DUMB go together. Ugly and assface go together.

It just doesn't make sense, to use the same shit over & over again, douch.



Look... He misspelled my username, or maybe he hasn't heard about copy & paste yet, ROFL. Anyways I don't give a fuck.



It just means that GaMEChld, & other users has no life, since it been 4 mouths already, they are just using the coat tails of others instead of makeing their own. Lowlife FUCKERS lol.

Just look at the start of this, come on 3 mouths after the fact! GaMEChld decides to reply back. That just proves that the person has no life, is just like a bitch. Moaning & bitching about nothing, and this long charade is proof.



GaMEChld punk out like a little bitch, lowlife piece of shit.


i guess GaMEChld was just complementing his person, because he is the "Idiot".



GaMEChld hasn't. All of his claims is bullshit, none of it back up with with hard cold facts, and none of my shit was proven wrong.


Make your own shit happen instead of using other people. SCUM.

Overall, I was proving GaMEChld shit was wrong, with each one of my cold hard facts, reply to his comments, & he kept running out of bullshit to say.



Than finally his last attempt to bring me down failed miserably & realizing he has no more shit to back him up with.

Since all of it was just "BULLSHIT".

Rofl, all your posts on this page just magically picked up 12 upvotes! No clone accounts my ass!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA YOU TOTALLY FELL FOR IT YOU DUMBASS! LOSERRRRRRRR!!!!!! TROLOLOLOLOL LOLOLOL TROLLOLOLLOLOL

Like you said "WE ARE SO POPULAR!"



Fell for what???
"2nd reply in"





Its just proves that you are a fucking low life scum bag, that lies, uses & abuses people.

Stop using meaningless bullshit against me. You have no fucking proof for anything.

You haven't said anything to back your claims up fucktard. Who will they believe? Someone that has a -20.42 rating like you GaMEChld, or someone that has a rating of 224.12 like me. I guess your plan backfired. Because it just proves that you have clone accounts, & i don't. Stop trying to use you own clone accounts to prove your point.... Which is no point at all douche.

Anyways, what the fuck??? DUMBFUCK GaMEChld

Rofl, you shot up 200+ points during that argument, you asshat. Now you have the gall to ask "what the fuck is a clone account?" Maybe you should have asked that before you argue that you have no clone accounts.

And I never said I wasn't using them, I made them just to pick on you lol. You completely fell for it and proved for all the world to see that you are a lying pile of trash. Notice how your last post magically has NO votes, when all the other ones got upvoted like crazy, by basically the same number every time. What is that? Your pathetic attempt to pretend you weren't upvoting yourself? Lol, you lying scumbag. Stop pretending, everyone can see how obvious you are. Call me a scumbag and say I abuse people? Take a look at the top you moron, you started the whole thing. Get a clue dumbshit.

Poor sad little troll. Go back to your bridge.

Don't be jealousy of my ratings, you fucked up... You keep fucking up with every reply


What the hell are you talking about??? Fucktard...

I don't have "Clone accounts"!!!
PROVE IT DUMBSHIT!!!





This proves you are a fucking low life scum bag, that lies, uses & abuses people.

How the hell does this prove that i'm liar. it doesn't DUMB CUNT!!!


This proves that your the liar here not me...Fuckstick

When you first mention Abu Dhabi, It proved that are a a douche "DUMSHIT"http://www.businessweek.c...2008/tc2008107_998689.htm

You are just an unreliable source of info & a liar. Just look at your ratings moron!!!


What, you can't take insignificant nickname. Its just like you calling me a troll. you don't see me acting like some dumb bitch, bitching about nothing like you, GaMEChld. Just look at this thread & the length of it.


Fell for what??? Talk about a DUMBASS lol

Stop making up meaningless bullshit, & using it against random people. It does not make you right, just because you have a pathetic life! ("NO LIFE" AT ALL"!!!)

LOLOL FAGGOT!

Thats all you have, after all that time?

Hey you proved my point about you after all.

GaMEChld pucked out like a worthless dumb bitch.

I'll repeat my advice for ya again dumb ass.


P.S ONLY PUSSIES GIVE UP. ->GaMEChld<-

LOLOLOL FAGGOT! TROLOOLOLOLOLOL

WHERED ALL YOUR +12's GO AFTER YOU GOT CALLED OUT ON IT?! NOOOOOB

I still have the 12+, than some. Where's yours, oh ya all on the thumbs down.

GaMEChld:


He's talking about his clone accounts.

HOLY CRAP YOU ARE STILL TALKING?! ROFL, GREAT ANSWER! THEY DISAPPEARED AFTER YOU GOT CALLED ON IT! COINCIDENCE MUCH?! SLUTCABBAGE!

macintoshci:

GaMEChld

I guess right!!! Hes's really a fucktard.

If GaMEchld was right, his ratings would be through the roof. But they aren't. I'm right & he's wrong. The rating system says it all.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/n...Work_with_Steve_Jobs.html

It seems Toms Hardware said it was B0 samples which were tested not B1 samples. Anandtech and xbitlabs also said B1 samples had problems too.

If they haven't any problems then they should show us the cpus!

Don't twist their words, they didn't said they "had to".

Does it mean that AMD wants its customers to get netbooks or nettops instead of gaming desktops?

You should ask them. Of course AMD doesn't waste time talking to you so you'd be better off making a story up by yourself instead. Ask Theo for help if you get stuck.

Do you think Llano is for nettops???
Do you think Opteron is for netbook???

Do you really hate AMD that much as it seems?

Then take a look on AMD Llano...

Really? Who has had the first commercial x86 CPU with an IMC and a point-to-point link to the chipset? And who has followed up years later...? Whose intellectual child x86-64 is (formerly AMD64, hint, hint)? Whose intellectual child the fusion of CPU and GPU is, taking advantage of the hunderds of stream processors, in order to bring GPGPU to everydays use, allowing for an unprecedented boost in performance? Who has a fully functional OpenCL 1.1 driver since last year? And who don't, because the IGP of Sandy Bridge is not up to the task, anyway...?