News
 

Bookmark and Share

(9) 

Advanced Micro Devices on Tuesday officially confirmed intention to use the "AMD FX" product brand for its desktop code-named Zambezi microprocessors powered by Bulldozer micro-architecture due out later this year. The FX-series chips will be primarily aimed at gamers and performance-demanding computer enthusiasts.

“AMD’s FX brand will enable an over-the-top experience for PC enthusiasts. By combining an unlocked, native eight-core processor, the latest in chipset technology, and AMD’s latest graphics cards, FX customers will enjoy an unrivalled feature set and amazing control over their PC’s performance," said Leslie Sobon, vice president of worldwide product marketing at AMD.

The FX brand has been traditionally associated with AMD’s fastest processors and most powerful platforms - those designed for unrestrained PC performance for the ultimate gaming and HD entertainment experiences. The company dropped the FX moniker for its central processing units (CPUs) in 2007 after rival Intel started to ship Core 2-series chips that offered overwhelming advantage compared to solutions by AMD.

Even though AMD did re-unveil the FX brand at the Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) trade show in the U.S., actual shipments of the Zambezi microprocessors will only become available in September due to technical issues that caused insufficient clock-speeds.

AMD believes that its multi-core Zambezi FX CPUs will allow it to compete head-to-head with Intel's high-end Core i-series "Sandy Bridge" processors that can sell for as much as $300 and more per chip.

AMD Orochi design is the company's next-generation processor for high-end desktop (Zambezi) and server (Valencia) markets. The chip will feature up to eight processing engines, but since it is based on Bulldozer micro-architecture, those cores will be packed into four modules. Every module which will have two independent integer cores (that will share fetch, decode and L2 functionality) with dedicated schedulers, one "Flex FP" floating point unit with two 128-bit FMAC pipes with one FP scheduler. The chip will have up to 8MB L2 cache, shared 8MB L3 cache, new dual-channel DDR3 memory controller and will use HyperTransport 3.1 bus. The Zambezi chips will use new AM3+ form-factor and will require brand new platforms.

Tags: AMD, Zambezi, Bulldozer, 32nm

Discussion

Comments currently: 9
Discussion started: 06/07/11 10:37:55 AM
Latest comment: 06/08/11 05:28:34 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-8]

1. 
How it might be called other but a "paper launch"?
0 0 [Posted by: Azazel  | Date: 06/07/11 10:37:55 AM]
Reply

2. 
blabla - where is the product and the benchmarks?
0 0 [Posted by: visz963  | Date: 06/07/11 11:04:25 AM]
Reply

3. 
still a vaporware!
0 0 [Posted by: dudde  | Date: 06/07/11 02:53:37 PM]
Reply

4. 
AMD just sings "All My Loving" and we enjoy the song!!!!!
0 0 [Posted by: Pouria  | Date: 06/07/11 03:10:12 PM]
Reply

5. 
Its an announcement, not a launch...
2 0 [Posted by: DIREWOLF75  | Date: 06/07/11 03:32:45 PM]
Reply

6. 
The marketing people go yey and the manufacturing department goes nah! Sorry, ive been watching too much Game of Thrones lol
0 1 [Posted by: vid_ghost  | Date: 06/07/11 06:22:31 PM]
Reply

7. 
Anton Shilov is wrong. I don't understand why he keeps writing crap like :
actual shipments of the Zambezi microprocessors will only become available in September due to technical issues that caused insufficient clock-speeds.


Bulldozer is hitting planned core speeds as we speak, there is too much demand for Llano and most Bulldozer wafers are reserved for clients like CRAY. There are no problems with Bulldozer period.
2 0 [Posted by: CarlosTex  | Date: 06/08/11 12:36:11 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
If that is true, AMD is making a mistake by not releasing the benchmarks and stopping a few intel core-igen2 customers in its tracks. I agree that the APU and Server commitments might be more important for the bottomline, but enthusiats planning upgrades / builds, I for one, would go be ready to wait for the FX release if the benchmarks are released with a committed availability date. No benchies implies no worthy silicon.
0 0 [Posted by: psycho_mccrazy  | Date: 06/08/11 05:28:34 AM]
Reply

8. 
The company dropped the FX moniker for its central processing units (CPUs) in 2007 after rival Intel started to ship Core 2-series chips that offered overwhelming advantage compared to solutions by AMD.


And I still thought that was a dumb move by AMD because they also dropped the dual socket platform as well once they did away with the FX series. I mean at the time they were getting their asses handed to them by Intel a Dual Socket AM2+ Quad Core setup for the first gen Phenoms X4's would have been awesome and would have kept them competitive with Intels highend solutions at the time.
0 0 [Posted by: SteelCity1981  | Date: 06/08/11 01:50:56 AM]
Reply

[1-8]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Monday, July 28, 2014

6:02 pm | Microsoft’s Mobile Strategy Seem to Fail: Sales of Lumia and Surface Remain Low. Microsoft Still Cannot Make Windows a Popular Mobile Platform

12:11 pm | Intel Core i7-5960X “Haswell-E” De-Lidded: Twelve Cores and Alloy-Based Thermal Interface. Intel Core i7-5960X Uses “Haswell-EP” Die, Promises Good Overclocking Potential

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones