News
 

Bookmark and Share

(9) 

Advanced Micro Devices intends to speed up the launch of its code-named Trinity A-series accelerated processing units (APUs) and release its next-generation Fusion chips already in the second quarter of 2012. Besides, the company intends to release a new FX-class Fusion Controller Hub (FCH) that will add better support for multi-GPU configurations and high-end RAID capabilities.

At present AMD’s Fusion A-series accelerated processing units (APUs) with integrated graphics adapters power mainstream personal computers that are not used for hardcore gaming. However, with the next-generation A-series Vision platform AMD plans to target the market of gamers: the Trinity APUs will feature high-performance Bulldozer/Piledriver x86 cores, and the A85FX FCH will feature native support for CrossFireX multi-GPU technology as well as RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 capabilities.

AMD’s second-generation code-named Trinity APU for mainstream personal computers (Comal for notebooks and Virgo for desktops) will be made using 32nm SOI HKMG process technology at Globalfoundries. The APU will feature up to four x86 cores powered by enhanced Bulldozer/Piledriver architecture, AMD Radeon HD 7000-series "Southern Islands" graphics core with DirectX 11-class graphics support, DDR3 memory controller and other improvements. The chips will be compatible with new FM2 infrastructure.

AMD claims that Trinity will offer up to 50% improvement in GFLOPS performance with the same power consumption as currently available A-series "Llano" APUs or similar GFLOPS horsepower with 50% reduction of power consumption.

Sources with knowledge of AMD’s plans said that the company intends to release the first Fusion Trinity APUs in the second quarter of 2012, less than a year after the company launched its Llano accelerated processing units.

The A85FX FCH – code-named Hudson D4 – will feature integrated clock-speed generator, PCI Express with CrossFireX support, PCI, USB 3.0 support, 8 SATA-6Gb/s ports and so on. The chipset will hit production in Q1 2011 and will be released at a yet unknown timeframe.

The improved support of multi-GPU technology by the second-generation A-series Vision platform code-named Virgo indicates indirectly that AMD’s expectations for the next-gen mainstream platform will be competitive enough for the market of gamers.

AMD did not comment on the news-story.

Tags: AMD, Bulldozer, Trinity, Llano, 32nm, Piledriver, Virgo

Discussion

Comments currently: 9
Discussion started: 09/08/11 07:22:31 PM
Latest comment: 09/12/11 05:31:34 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-4]

1. 
the more products they have on the market the better for the market.
3 0 [Posted by: vid_ghost  | Date: 09/08/11 07:22:31 PM]
Reply

2. 
If past experience is any indicator, we most likely are looking at Q4 2012 at best for Trinity. I hope I am wrong and that AMD won't screw up this time. I waited for BD; now waiting for Trinity.
0 0 [Posted by: gamoniac  | Date: 09/08/11 09:11:35 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
it's not the same...once BD is done it's easy to tweak it...unless it has some major flaws that will need redesign. afaik GF has some problems with the production process and that's why they agreed with the "get payed only for good dies agreement"
0 0 [Posted by: glitch  | Date: 09/09/11 12:10:42 AM]
Reply

3. 
With all possible delays, Q4 2012 is more realistic. At first time it looks like they have everything in place: mature bulldozer cores, mature 32 nm and mature GPU, so they can really release it in Q2. But with Llano also everything was mature, but it was heavily delayed. Designing CPU is not as easy as playing with lego bricks.
0 0 [Posted by: Tristan  | Date: 09/09/11 01:25:02 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
The 32nm process tech was mature as well, right? Or you forgot something? Not to mention the whole conception and infrastructure.
0 0 [Posted by: Martian  | Date: 09/09/11 01:13:37 PM]
Reply
 
It seems 32nm yields are the big problem for now. The yields aren't great, and that means for some hard decisions regarding Llano vs Zambezi production. Intel doesn't have to deal with all this nonsense since they have their own fabs. But it seems that yields are ALWAYS a problem on new processes from TSMC (and now GloFo). I feel like AMD should just assume that yields are going to suck, and then if they don't suck, they'll be pleasantly surprised, as will the public. Better that, than missing deadlines.
5 13 [Posted by: GaMEChld  | Date: 09/10/11 01:26:26 PM]
Reply
 
It's not because the fabs are now only partially owned by AMD. A new process tech is always a problem. While Intel has the luxury of advantage in time and the number of factories, it's not a surprise they don't struggle because of these problems. Not to mention they always avoid changing the architecture and the process tech at the same time. Whenever they change process tech they only release a shrink with minor improvements.
3 0 [Posted by: Martian  | Date: 09/12/11 05:31:34 PM]
Reply

4. 
AMD's always had this problem and Intel has used this advantage to leapfrog them even with worse CPU designs

Back when AMD had a 90nm Athlon CPU that was superior To Intels 65nm Pentium 4, Intel used its process advantage to keep up with AMD, now with Sandybridge CPU's they are ahead on two levels.

AMD needs a mature 32nm process asap if they want to compete.
0 0 [Posted by: vid_ghost  | Date: 09/11/11 04:44:41 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
A process like you say has nothing to do with performance. It is the engine or micro-architecture that matters the most. Also it is the microcode. During those days the K7 was hard for Pentium 4 to beat. A Pentium 4 2.6 GHz is required to beat a K7. AMD K7 was superior to Pentium 4. Then came K8 and it is superior not just on performance, but on lower power consumption although the first K8 was 130 nm vs the Pentium 4 was at 65 nm. The Pentium M put Intel in gear again and this processor was only for mobile or notebooks. The Pentium M then become the Core 2.

What AMD needs to do is figure out why the A-series mobile processors are competing well with the Core-i series mobile processors. Then bring that processor to the desktop world. At this time the A-series desktop processors are not that great compared to the A-series mobile processors.
1 0 [Posted by: tecknurd  | Date: 09/12/11 02:24:58 AM]
Reply

[1-4]

Add your Comment

[Login] [Forgot password?] [Registration]




Related news

Latest News

Thursday, May 24, 2012

10:00 pm | Microsoft Clarifies Its Exec's Claims: 500 Million Windows 8 Copies in 2013 Are "Potential" Upgrades. Microsoft Retracts Statement Regarding 500 Million Windows 8 Licenses to Be Sold in 2013

8:35 pm | ECS Reveals "NonStop" Mainboard Family with Extended Stability and Reliability. ECS Boosts Stability and Reliability with Premium Components and Rigorous Testing on NonStop Platforms

6:28 pm | AMD Rumoured to Start Production of Next-Gen FX-Chips in Q3. AMD to Start Making FX "Vishera" Chips Next Quarter

11:32 am | UMC Begins to Build Fab to Make 28nm, 20nm and 14nm Chips. UMC Spends $8 Billion on Expansion, Confirms Development of 14nm FinFET Process Technology

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

11:17 pm | OCZ Quietly Introduces 7mm Vertex 3 LP SSDs for Ultrathin Laptops. OCZ Reveals Low-Profile Vertex 3 LP Solid-State Drives

11:01 pm | Toshiba Vows to Release Hybrid Hard Disk Drive in September. Toshiba Confirms Development of Hybrid Hard Disk Drive

10:28 pm | Jury Finds: Google Android Did Not Infringe Oracle's Patents. Google Not Guilty of Infringing Oracle's Patents

8:48 pm | 208 Million "Phablets" Set to Be Sold by 2015 - Analysts. Smartphones with Ultra Large Screens Will Continue Gaining Popularity

8:23 pm | Microsoft Expects 500 Million People to Use Windows 8 Next Year [UPDATED]. Microsoft Projects Breakthrough for Windows 8 Sales Thanks to Compatibility with Different Devices

7:07 pm | Thunderbolt Interface to Receive Green Light from Mainboard Makers in Second Half of 2012 - Rumour. Thunderbolt Interconnection to Make It to Mainstream Systems Later in 2012

6:18 pm | Apple and Samsung Fail to Reach Settlement at Special Meeting. Court-Ordered Meeting Does Not Resolve Apple Vs. Samsung Dispute

12:10 pm | Seagate Set to Take Over LaCie. Seagate and LaCie Agree About Acquisition