News
 

Bookmark and Share

(33) 

Intel Corp. has revealed official performance advantage expectations for its next-generation microprocessors code-named Ivy Bridge. Thanks to new micro-architectural improvements, the world's largest chipmaker expects Core i 3000-series processors to deliver up to 25% better performance than existing Core i 2000-series "Sandy Bridge" chips in office applications and up to 199% improvements in graphics intensive apps.

Intel recently started to spread its official Ivy Bridge performance expectations among its partners, manufacturers of personal computers and resellers. The documents by Intel, which have leaked to the Internet, demonstrate that Intel rather high expectations for its next-generation Core i 3000-series microprocessors when it comes to general purpose performance and especially graphics performance. According to the documents, Intel Core i7-3770 (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.40GHz, 8MB cache) will deliver the following advantages compared its predecessor Core i7-2600 (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.40GHz, 8MB cache):

  • +7% higher overall SYSmark 2012 score;
  • +14% higher overall HDXPRT 2011 score;
  • +15% higher Cinebench 11.5 score;
  • +13% better ProShow Gold 4.5 result;
  • +25% faster performance in Excel 2010;
  • +56% faster performance in ArcSoft Media Expresso;
  • +192% higher overall 3DMark Vantage score;
  • +17% faster performance in 3DMark Vantage CPU benchmark;
  • +199% faster performance in 3DMark Vantage GPU benchmark;

Thanks to improved performance of Ivy Bridge, Intel will not only be able to improve competitive positions of its chips compared to microprocessors by Advanced Micro Devices, but will likely manage to increase its share on the graphics adapter market thanks to more competitive performance of built-in Intel HD graphics engine versus entry-level discrete graphics processors.

Ivy Bridge will generally inherit Sandy Bridge micro-architecture and will sport a rather significant number of improvements. Firstly, it will have certain improvements that will boost its performance in general applications by around 20% compared to Core i "Sandy Bridge" chips (e.g., enhanced AVX acceleration). Secondly, the forthcoming chip will have a new graphics core with DirectX 11 and OpenCL 1.1 support, 30% higher performance compared to the predecessor as well as new video processor and display controllers. Thirdly, Ivy Bridge will feature PCI Express 3.0 x16 interconnection as well as PCIe 2.0 x4 controller. In fourth, the processor will support a number of power management innovations. The CPU is made using 22nm process technology.

Intel will release its code-named Ivy Bridge central processing units for desktops in March or April, 2012.

Intel did not comment on the news-story since the documents describing Ivy Bridge performance are not made available for general public.

Tags: Intel, 22nm, Ivy Bridge, Core, Sandy Bridge

Discussion

Comments currently: 33
Discussion started: 11/29/11 09:08:27 PM
Latest comment: 02/16/12 03:50:45 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-15]

1. 
Hahahah...Yes with a 2x boost to intel's IGP it will be just as good if not better than AMD Trinity's IGP. Lower power consumption and Higher IPC Oh Yeah I can't wait for this to be in an ultrabook it is going to be sweet.
4 8 [Posted by: jmlxg  | Date: 11/29/11 09:08:27 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Indeed it will be very sweet, but we are yet to see the 28nm APU's from AMD with 7000 series Graphics, reviews will clear up how good these intel graphics chips are... 200% better then something thats nothing special to begin with isnt that great, Intel has a huge advantage with 22nm (intel) VS 32nm (AMD)
3 9 [Posted by: vid_ghost  | Date: 11/29/11 09:19:11 PM]
Reply
 
Yep down with any pro Amd comment on this site,down with them i say, had any of you imagine that these improvements could have been a LOT better if Amd had a nice competitor in the market? Anyway don't expect for Amd to sit tight with llano,it's their only chance at this moment so i bet they will come up with improvements.
3 1 [Posted by: george1976  | Date: 11/30/11 06:35:48 AM]
Reply
 
Yeah it might be their only chance but Trinity will use AMD piledriver which will bring lower IPC and higher clock speeds and I don't think it will be very efficient.
1 2 [Posted by: jmlxg  | Date: 11/30/11 06:43:11 AM]
Reply
 
actually performance is better with graphics (where AMD beats intel) but not in CPU stuff (where intel beats AMD) so it looks like intel needs some competetion in CPU stuff so it'd increas performance
1 1 [Posted by: madooo12  | Date: 12/01/11 03:47:28 PM]
Reply
 
i quite not so sure for intel 22nm, waiting for power leakage issue...
0 0 [Posted by: badaxoi  | Date: 12/23/11 10:18:54 PM]
Reply
 
seriously, if you think this will beat trinity for IGP then you must be on drugs.
1 1 [Posted by: parkerm35  | Date: 12/04/11 11:34:26 AM]
Reply

2. 
IB is 200% faster than HD 2000, that makes it still 20-43% slower than Llano. Trinity is ~ 30 % faster than Llano in gfx, it is still in some cases twice as fast as HD 4000.
6 5 [Posted by: mraei  | Date: 11/29/11 09:37:39 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
That is in the best case for AMD. Most of the time Ivy bridge will just as good AMD's Trinity if not better.
3 5 [Posted by: jmlxg  | Date: 11/30/11 06:45:21 AM]
Reply
 
So you have an Ivy Bridge & have tested it against Trinity? [/sarcasm]
3 4 [Posted by: Iceman  | Date: 11/30/11 06:52:29 AM]
Reply
 
Its much like Same Story if you compare that to AMD and Intel CPU only.

AMD only part that excel over Intel is its Graphics Processor. but CPU is very behind.
3 1 [Posted by: xentar  | Date: 11/30/11 07:02:39 AM]
Reply
 
yes, as is the intel IGP very behind. so it evens off.
1 1 [Posted by: parkerm35  | Date: 12/04/11 11:36:14 AM]
Reply

3. 
Intel, just enable AES-NI on the cheaper CPUs. I want to replace my server with a new CPU, but the current low-price CPUs do not bring much performance over my E5300. And I'm using encryption on 2 network-shared partitions.
4 1 [Posted by: mathew7  | Date: 11/30/11 12:10:33 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
You thought about using an e3 server chip? Fairly cheap, has AES-NI, an e3 1220 has an recommended retail price of $190 to $230. Of course that doesn't include buying a new motherboard.
2 0 [Posted by: GavinT  | Date: 11/30/11 03:57:50 AM]
Reply

4. 
The IGP benches are completely fishy, as the i7-2600K is shipped with the faster HD 3000 IGP, not the HD 2000 it's apparently been tested with here.
2 2 [Posted by: Proesterchen  | Date: 11/30/11 01:52:26 AM]
Reply

5. 
There is huge increase in GPU performance because they are comparing HD4000 to HD2000

If they compare it to HD3000 you would probably see only 1.5x increase (which is still impressive)

The CPU improvement is impressive. 15% faster in cinebench !!. This really proves that ivy bridge is more than just die shrink with lower TDP
5 1 [Posted by: maroon1  | Date: 11/30/11 03:38:47 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Don't be so sure the graph shows almost 3x improvment over the HD 2000. Even So Intel's IGP will be better than I thought it would be.
2 0 [Posted by: jmlxg  | Date: 11/30/11 06:40:07 AM]
Reply

6. 
6 6 [Posted by: Bro  | Date: 11/30/11 04:12:47 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Another idiot who thinks no competition would be beneficial. :sigh:
0 0 [Posted by: M8R-eqfmqh  | Date: 12/20/11 04:02:19 PM]
Reply

7. 
So.... Let's discuss the CPU inprovements. They may have uplifted the core but i bet IB turbos at least 200 MHZ more than SB. So a good part of that increased CPU performance may be coming from increased turbo vs SB.
2 1 [Posted by: CarlosTex  | Date: 11/30/11 05:35:43 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
No clock speeds and Turbo will be exactly the same, 3.5ghz / 3.9ghz turbo for 3770k vs. 2700k.
0 3 [Posted by: BestJinjo  | Date: 11/30/11 10:33:23 PM]
Reply

8. 
Luckily the motherboard is still the boss around. Personaly i don't care too much about TC since it doesen't include the aftermarket cooler into it's operating scheme.
0 3 [Posted by: buggy4001  | Date: 12/01/11 02:46:52 AM]
Reply

9. 
I just wish Intel would come out with a cpu Core i7 or i5 series with no gpu and give people the option of wanting a gpu on thier cpu's and save them money, because if you are a gamer or are into anything that requires a lot of graphics you're not going to use the onchip gpu, so it becomes a waste.
1 0 [Posted by: SteelCity1981  | Date: 12/01/11 06:21:16 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
I agree. I use discrete GPU cards and don't need the iGPU. I wonder why Intel didn't choose to release iGPU CPU's? I was considering buying an e3 chip which come with or without the integrated GPU.
0 0 [Posted by: GavinT  | Date: 12/02/11 05:54:32 AM]
Reply

10. 
Those figures, kindly provided by Intel,are a crock of excrement

As if they wouldn't try to show any improvements in the best possible light and the idiot intel fanboys just lap it up, its just so funny yet sad
1 0 [Posted by: alpha0ne  | Date: 12/01/11 09:36:39 PM]
Reply

11. 
Seriously guys, for the ones that think the IGP will be any sort of a match for the Southern Islands GPU then you live on cloud 9. It will be at least 40% slower for Gaming, mark my words.
0 2 [Posted by: parkerm35  | Date: 12/04/11 11:49:18 AM]
Reply

12. 
According to the numbers it will be twice as fast as the HD3000 and I can't wait. Only in some cases will it be that much faster. Remember Intel's IGP is increasing by 2x AMD's is only going increase by 10% to 40%.
0 0 [Posted by: jmlxg  | Date: 12/06/11 06:20:51 PM]
Reply

13. 
Question: What does 199 % improment in graphical applications mean in the context of separate GPU cards?
0 0 [Posted by: TeemuMilto  | Date: 12/11/11 05:48:53 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
ALSO LOWER CPU'S CORE I5 AND I3(NOW HD2000) COME WITH HD2500, ABOUT 75% PERFOMANCE OF EXISTING HD3000. ONLY EXISTING HD3000 CPU'S ARE RAISED TO HD4000.
0 1 [Posted by: SHINEPR  | Date: 12/19/11 06:31:08 AM]
Reply

14. 
ALSO LOWER CPU'S CORE I5 AND I3(NOW HD2000) COME WITH HD2500, ABOUT 75% PERFOMANCE OF EXISTING HD3000. ONLY EXISTING HD3000 CPU'S ARE RAISED TO HD4000.
0 1 [Posted by: SHINEPR  | Date: 12/19/11 06:35:18 AM]
Reply

15. 
Does this mean a complete new socket/new MB to run an Ivy Bridge CPU?
0 0 [Posted by: USAFANG67  | Date: 12/29/11 12:15:47 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
It is called LGA 2011.
0 0 [Posted by: TeemuMilto  | Date: 01/13/12 08:56:11 AM]
Reply
 
lol, this is Intel we are talking about here, it will probably be a new socket for each model.
0 0 [Posted by: parkerm35  | Date: 02/16/12 03:50:45 PM]
Reply

[1-15]

Add your Comment

[Login] [Forgot password?] [Registration]




Related news

Latest News

Thursday, May 24, 2012

10:00 pm | Microsoft Clarifies Its Exec's Claims: 500 Million Windows 8 Copies in 2013 Are "Potential" Upgrades. Microsoft Retracts Statement Regarding 500 Million Windows 8 Licenses to Be Sold in 2013

8:35 pm | ECS Reveals "NonStop" Mainboard Family with Extended Stability and Reliability. ECS Boosts Stability and Reliability with Premium Components and Rigorous Testing on NonStop Platforms

6:28 pm | AMD Rumoured to Start Production of Next-Gen FX-Chips in Q3. AMD to Start Making FX "Vishera" Chips Next Quarter

11:32 am | UMC Begins to Build Fab to Make 28nm, 20nm and 14nm Chips. UMC Spends $8 Billion on Expansion, Confirms Development of 14nm FinFET Process Technology

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

11:17 pm | OCZ Quietly Introduces 7mm Vertex 3 LP SSDs for Ultrathin Laptops. OCZ Reveals Low-Profile Vertex 3 LP Solid-State Drives

11:01 pm | Toshiba Vows to Release Hybrid Hard Disk Drive in September. Toshiba Confirms Development of Hybrid Hard Disk Drive

10:28 pm | Jury Finds: Google Android Did Not Infringe Oracle's Patents. Google Not Guilty of Infringing Oracle's Patents

8:48 pm | 208 Million "Phablets" Set to Be Sold by 2015 - Analysts. Smartphones with Ultra Large Screens Will Continue Gaining Popularity

8:23 pm | Microsoft Expects 500 Million People to Use Windows 8 Next Year [UPDATED]. Microsoft Projects Breakthrough for Windows 8 Sales Thanks to Compatibility with Different Devices

7:07 pm | Thunderbolt Interface to Receive Green Light from Mainboard Makers in Second Half of 2012 - Rumour. Thunderbolt Interconnection to Make It to Mainstream Systems Later in 2012

6:18 pm | Apple and Samsung Fail to Reach Settlement at Special Meeting. Court-Ordered Meeting Does Not Resolve Apple Vs. Samsung Dispute

12:10 pm | Seagate Set to Take Over LaCie. Seagate and LaCie Agree About Acquisition