News
 

Bookmark and Share

(7) 

While Intel Corp. is facing great demand towards its advanced Core i-series "Sandy Bridge" microprocessors, the firm of witnessing rapidly dropping demand towards its low-cost/low-power Atom chip line. In Q4 2011 sales of Intel Atom hit all-time low, which is another evidence of dropping popularity of netbooks and ultra low-cost PCs powered by Intel in general.

Based on Intel's financial report, the Atom micro-architecture revenue, including microprocessors and associated chipsets, was $167 million, down 38% from the third quarter and down 57% from the fourth quarter of 2010. Apparently, even despite of the beginning of revenue shipments of Atom 2000-series "Cedarview" chip, overall sales of the product family fell significantly. According to the world's largest chipmaker, Intel Atom micro-architecture revenue is down as a result of lower demand for netbooks, inexpensive small form-factor mobile computers with limited performance and capabilities.

Thanks to growing popularity of tablets, mainly as a result of major improvements of Apple iOS and Google Android software as well as price drops and/or campaigns, sales of netbooks suffered another major decline in the fourth quarter of 2011. Unfortunately for Intel, it yet has to win media tablet designs and presently it cannot offset netbook declines with surge of x86-powered tablets.

It is clear that Intel will continue to supply standalone Atom chips to PC makers interested in making inexpensive systems, those systems will be vastly different from netbooks as we know them and eventually will also demand more powerful microprocessors, which Intel seems to be on track to provide. The ultra low-cost personal computer (ULCPC) idea - which emerged together with Atom and then Windows Starter - has clearly failed to catalyze sales on both emerging and established markets.

It is noteworthy that Intel did not even specifically mention Atom during its conference call with financial analysts on Thursday. The company did say that it was working hard to get additional tablet and smartphone design wins with its code-named Medfield chips, but Intel's execs did not mention "Atom" brand name for some reason at all.

But it clearly not the end for the Atom. It will change form-factors and will leap to new performance levels as Intel needs an ultra low-power micro-architecture to address very different markets. In the coming years the chip designer plans to release three major updates for its Atom family of solutions. The first one will be code-named Saltwell and will be made using 32nm process technology; the second is currently known as Silvermont and will be manufactured using 22nm/tri-gate fabrication process; the third major improvement of the Atom has Airmont code-named core and is aimed at 14nm fabrication process.

Tags: Intel, Atom, Pineview, Cedarview, Airmont, Saltwell, Silvermont, 45nm, 32nm, 22nm, 14nm

Discussion

Comments currently: 7
Discussion started: 01/20/12 06:45:27 PM
Latest comment: 01/21/12 04:13:13 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-6]

1. 
AMD's Fusion picked up where Atom left off.
5 3 [Posted by: Memristor  | Date: 01/20/12 06:45:27 PM]
Reply

2. 
Picked up what, nobody buying.
2 4 [Posted by: Tukee44  | Date: 01/20/12 07:24:50 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
AMD's sales number show that it is doing well with netbooks.
4 1 [Posted by: Memristor  | Date: 01/21/12 05:34:17 AM]
Reply

3. 
Nobody's buying netbooks anymore but Fusion is selling very well in laptops and entry level desktops.
3 2 [Posted by: evernessince  | Date: 01/20/12 07:43:10 PM]
Reply

4. 
Netbooks go where they were supposed to go ever since they exist, garbage. Tablets are the next.
1 1 [Posted by: Martian  | Date: 01/20/12 11:04:37 PM]
Reply

5. 
atom isn't bean updated that much in all these years. and whit transformer tablets (tablet whit keybourd) the netbook market pretty much lost while the laptop market is still more powerful. and have decent chips.
2 1 [Posted by: massau  | Date: 01/21/12 03:04:56 AM]
Reply

6. 
No wonder, AMD is offering a similar performing CPU with better GPU.

I don't see why someone may want get an atom powered netbook at the moment.

On the other hand intel also is turning at the "ultrabooks" so they don't see to care for cheap computers anymore.
Greedy? Just leave the other chipmakers (AMD and VIA) to take a breath in this market?
We will never find out but it doesn't matter.

I personally could be more interested in getting a cheap netbook with ubuntu than a more expensive tablet.
That is if I didn't had already a laptop.

1 1 [Posted by: nitro912gr  | Date: 01/21/12 04:13:13 PM]
Reply

[1-6]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Thursday, August 21, 2014

10:59 pm | Khronos Group to Follow DirectX 12 with Cross-Platform Low-Level API. Khronos Unveils Next-Generation OpenGL Initiative

10:33 pm | Avexir Readies 3.40GHz DDR4 Memory Modules. DDR4 Could Hit 3.40GHz This Year

12:10 pm | AMD to Lower Prices of A-Series APUs for Back-to-School Season. New Prices of AMD A-Series APUs Revealed

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

10:53 am | AMD to Cut Prices on FX-9000, Other FX Processors: New Prices Revealed. AMD to Make FX Chips More Affordable, Discontinue Low-End Models

10:32 am | LG to Introduce World’s First Curved 21:9 Ultra-Wide Display. LG Brings Curved Displays to Gamers, Professionals

9:59 am | AMD Readies FX-8370, FX-8370E Microprocessors. AMD Preps Two New “Mainstream” FX Chips