Next year Intel Corp. will provide enthusiasts brand new capabilities to tune up performance of their code-named Haswell microprocessors. Many of the new features promise to be rather revolutionary for Intel Corp.'s modern mainstream platforms.
While currently-available Intel Core i-series "Ivy Bridge" microprocessors and supporting platforms already support respectable amount of capabilities for performance tuning and overclocking, with the next-gen Intel Core "Haswell" platforms the chip giant plans to offer even more flexibility when it comes to boosting performance. In particular, some of the features only available on high-end enthusiast-class LGA2011 platforms will be supported.
At the Intel Developer Forum last week the world's largest maker of central processing units (CPUs) revealed that its fourth-generation Core i "Haswell" chips will feature even more "knobs" for relevant frequency and voltage domains of the chip as well as higher core ratios than today for those, who want to set-up clock-speed records using extreme cooling methods like liquid nitrogen. But the main improvement of Haswell platform over current Ivy Bridge and Sandy Bridge will be support for variable DMICLK/BCLK [base clock] coarse ratios supported currently only by the high-end desktop (HEDT) LGA2011 platform.

Nowadays there is virtually one safe way of overclocking Intel Core K-family LGA1155 microprocessors with unlocked multiplier: by adjusting the latter, which generally means poor frequency granularity. When processor system bus is overclocked, other busses within a PC also change clock-speed (since BCLK ratio is locked) which usually causes errors. Meanwhile, Intel Core Extreme LGA2011 platforms support various BCLK, e.g., 125MHz and 166MHz, in addition to default 100MHz, which allows to play with both multiplier and bus speed without overclocking of other components (like input/output controllers, PCI Express bus and so on).
With Core i7 "Haswell" K-series LG1150 central processing units, Intel will bring variable BCLK coarse ratios to the mainstream platforms, which will provide more flexibility to overclockers. Intel platform will still not allow independent clocking of processor bus and other components, but one can be rest assured that for enthusiasts Haswell may provide more than existing chips.
Tags: Intel, Haswell, 22nm, Core, LGA1150, LGA2011, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge
Comments currently:
11
Discussion started: 09/19/12 10:37:30 PM
Latest comment: 11/01/12 02:56:38 AM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-3]
1.
There is definitely a market for people with more money than brains and Intel is exploiting the clueless at every opportunity. PT Barnum was right, there is a fool born every second.
BTW, being able to change CPU/Mobo settings does NOT guarantee that any CPU will OC better than without a bunch of useless knobs to turn. A CPU is going to run at a certain level and nothing short of extreme cooling is going to significantly change this reality. When you look at what small gains are possible from the over-priced CPUs and mobos you find that you are paying an extreme price for a minute difference in performance that doesn't even show other than in benches.
It's a laughable duping of the naive.
show the post
1
10
[
Posted by: beenthere

|
Date: 09/20/12 06:27:20 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
"With Core i7 "Haswell" K-series LG1150 central processing units, Intel will bring variable BCLK coarse ratios to the mainstream platforms, which will provide more flexibility to overclockers."
^ Does the article say anything about Intel charging extra for bringing BCLK to the mainstream CPUs? No.
Moving on to the next point of you implying people who buy K series chips have more $ than brains.
$225 for a i5 2500k/i5 3570K @ 4.5ghz that beats all AMD CPUs and will last 3-4 years is cheap. Not sure what you are talking about. If you are a PC gamer, there has never been a time where an Intel or AMD CPU has lasted this long for games. Even right now a Core i7 920 @ 4.0ghz is fast enough for any single GTX680/7970GE GPU.
Really, the K series chips go through special validation process and are the least leaky parts:
http://www.anandtech.com/...andtech-podcast-episode-1
You are paying $20 extra for them but you know you are getting the best binned i5/i7 series CPU.
Intel warranties overclocking fully which means if you break the chip, they foot the bill. I think it's reasonable they charge $20 for this and us overclockers understand it.
You keep looking at Intel charging extra for overclocking but the way I look at it is I have to spend $150-180 for a slow FX8120/8150 series vs. $225 for a Core i5 3570K that will destroy it in most tasks I run. Over the course of 2-3 years of ownership that extra premium is well worth it for people dropping $400-1000 on GPUs, $200 on SSDs, etc. The gaming performance of Bulldozer is appalling. It should be $99 on special for gamers since it loses to a Core i3:
http://techreport.com/rev...rformance-with-today-cpus
Then you get much higher power consumption at load, which adds electricity costs and heat associated with an overclocked FX8120/8150.
For gamers and overclockers, $225 for Core i5 3570K is actually a bargain. When modern gamers spend $500 on a GTX680 style GPU, do you think they care to save $50 on a CPU and end up with a 30-40% lower minimum frame rates? Please, especially when you consider an i5 @ 4.5ghz will be fast for 2-3 years and FX series is already a bottleneck.
show the post
1
7
[
Posted by: BestJinjo

|
Date: 09/20/12 09:21:53 AM]
2.
Lamers do not even represent 5% of the CPU market so it doesn't really matter what they think or believe.
What matters is that 95% of PC consumers buy mainstream CPUs from both AMD and Intel and dollar-for-dollar AMD provides the better solution per dollar, every time.
That's reality and why AMD continues to exist inspite of the foolishness spewed by the haters.
Another AMD win:
http://semiaccurate.com/2...onfirms-wii-u-design-win/
show the post
0
9
[
Posted by: beenthere

|
Date: 09/20/12 09:28:03 AM]
3.
Lamers put AMD chips in their PC's and play minesweeper, Gamers put Intel inside and play BF3.
Without gamers there is no progression of tech markets, without lamers AMD would be bust 10 years ago.
0
0
[
Posted by: Sjbr101

|
Date: 11/01/12 02:56:38 AM]
[1-3]