Intel Corp. on Tuesday reported its financial results for the third quarter of the year. Even though the company retained profitability, its sales were down 5% year-over-year and the outlook for the ongoing quarter the company provided points to continued issues with demand for personal computers. Nonetheless, the company is on track to start production of next-generation Haswell microprocessors in Q4 2012.
"Our third-quarter results reflected a continuing tough economic environment. The world of computing is in the midst of a period of breakthrough innovation and creativity. As we look to the fourth quarter, we're pleased with the continued progress in ultrabooks and phones and excited about the range of Intel-based tablets coming to market," said Paul Otellini, president and CEO of Intel.
Intel reported third quarter revenue of $13.5 billion (down 5% year-over-year), operating income of $3.8 billion (down 20% compared to the year ago quarter), net income of $3.0 billion (14% lower than a year ago) and EPS of $0.58 (down 11% year-over-year). For the fourth quarter of 2012, the world's largest chipmaker expects revenue of $13.6 billion ± $500 million and gross margins of around 57%~58%.

To respond to a weaker than expected demand environment, Intel has taken several actions. In particular, the chipmaker substantially cut wafer starts at its factories in late Q3 2012 and intends to maintain lower factory utilization rates throughout the fourth quarter. Intel projects these factory adjustments to help bring down its total inventory levels by approximately $500 million. At the same time, Intel stressed that despite of lower demand for PCs, it will start initial volume manufacturing of its next-generation Haswell central processing units this quarter, which will cause an uptick of inventory levels.
"We expect an increase in inventory reserves as we start production on our next-generation micro architecture product code-named Haswell, which we expect to qualify for sale in the first quarter of 2013," said Stacy Smith, chief financial officer of Intel.
At present Intel still does not specifically reveal when does the Haswell chips and products on their base are scheduled to hit the market. The company only claims that the first Haswell-based systems will be available in the first half of the year.
Tags: Intel, Haswell, Core, 22nm, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge
Comments currently:
24
Discussion started: 10/17/12 06:58:06 AM
Latest comment: 10/31/12 12:50:38 PM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-5]
1.
SLOW DEMAND?
You'd think there was a worldwide economic depression or something with 2012 PC sales numbers down to that of 2001...
show the post
3
10
[
Posted by: beenthere

|
Date: 10/17/12 01:29:36 PM]
+ expand thread (8 answers)
- collapse thread
I think you are hallucinating again. Do you live in your own world?
Of course there is a worldwide economic depression. Many businesses have shut down around the globe and consumers don't buy as much now.
In case you haven't noticed, chip makers only care about the numbers and how much profit they make from the amount of chips that they are doing. When they think sales are not going to be as much, they wont make more chips to have more costs. I think you should visit european countries to see what is going on.
2
3
[
Posted by: AvonX

|
Date: 10/17/12 02:01:09 PM]
Did you not notice the sarcasm in his post? He obviously knows PC sales have slowed down to 2001 levels but when he provided evidence and links in other threads, many people continued to ignore what he was trying to say. That's the point for his sarcasm in this thread I bet.
If Intel sneezes, AMD catch a cold. My guess is AMD will be hit severely tomorrow.
show the post
1
9
[
Posted by: BestJinjo

|
Date: 10/17/12 02:37:52 PM]
AMD wouldn't be hit if they had better products.
They would have definitely chosen the cheaper AMD but they missed the opportunity that was given to them.
The odds would of been on AMD's side, but they failed again.
1
3
[
Posted by: AvonX

|
Date: 10/17/12 03:07:12 PM]
I see you support beenthere now, while in the past you gave him acid replies. Nice way to change sides.
0
1
[
Posted by: cosminmcm

|
Date: 10/18/12 12:52:22 AM]
I am not supporting any side for your information.
From where do you get this wild ideas?
0
2
[
Posted by: AvonX

|
Date: 10/18/12 05:44:24 AM]
Only in countries with large government borrowings the rest of us are doing nicely thank you. This is the north Atlantic region.Back to topic Looks like Intel are playing catchup again trying to equal or better chips with a decent video.
2
2
[
Posted by: tedstoy

|
Date: 10/17/12 08:06:29 PM]
"Only in countries with large government borrowings" Really? LoL If you start counting them you will find allot of countries that fit that description. Even the United States owes allot of money. Just saying.
0
2
[
Posted by: AvonX

|
Date: 10/18/12 06:08:15 AM]
Just continue to ignore the general economic depression and soon your door will be the next to be knocked on. Be sure of that.
0
0
[
Posted by: Brutalos

|
Date: 10/31/12 12:50:38 PM]
2.
The IGNORANCE spewed by the haters is laughable.
They don't even have a clue what 2001 PC industry sales volume numbers mean. No wonder they hate. They can't even understand what's happening right in front of their nose.
With Intel sales down 5% and them idling Fabs, you'd thing the technically challenge could buy a clue, but instead they just hate and stay in denial.
Ignorance really is Bliss for the clueless haters in denial.
show the post
1
10
[
Posted by: beenthere

|
Date: 10/17/12 06:53:52 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
@beenthere
Go back to AMD threads. LoL
We would give you a hard time there also anyway. LOL
1
2
[
Posted by: AvonX

|
Date: 10/18/12 05:40:27 AM]
3.
Lately I read some article about Intels upcoming Haswell that will not provide to support PCI-E 3.0...what the f**CK Intel? Lets buy AMD Trinity folks
show the post
0
4
[
Posted by: 16xcore

|
Date: 10/17/12 08:47:22 PM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)
- collapse thread
Well you can blame AMD for that, for not giving any competition whatsoever to Intel.
If you haven't heard already, Intel is renewing some of its old technologies and they will sell them as new.
2
2
[
Posted by: AvonX

|
Date: 10/18/12 07:11:47 AM]
lol look how jmlxg and AvonX auto defend intel.
0
0
[
Posted by: the_file

|
Date: 10/21/12 09:54:43 PM]
4.
What economic depression/recession, Huh there was 2 of them when did this happen?

It's times like these that it's great to be an Aussie!
show the post
0
3
[
Posted by: ozegamer

|
Date: 10/18/12 12:32:58 AM]
+ expand thread (3 answers)
- collapse thread
Just because you are doing fine, doesn't mean that all the rest are doing fine. And this post also goes for "tedstoy" With ignorant thinking like that, you would not last a single minute in a large business like Intel.
2
3
[
Posted by: AvonX

|
Date: 10/18/12 05:33:31 AM]
It's a joke,Lighten up no wonder the rest of you are stuffed!
It is your countries ignorant thinking which is why you got yourselves into the shit! Don't for one minute think that ANY large corporation is safe either, Many have come and gone. All it takes is one poor decision, Apple should watch themselves also, I have already jumped ship.
1
2
[
Posted by: ozegamer

|
Date: 10/18/12 12:13:18 PM]
Another AMD fan-boy who follows me around.
Go back to AMD threads where you came from and stop posting BS. Go to the delusional AMD fan-boys, they might take you more seriously there. Apple fans and AMD fans have some things in common. You know what it is? LoL.
I wont say but its clear to everyone i think.

1
1
[
Posted by: AvonX

|
Date: 10/18/12 02:27:36 PM]
5.
WOW these people just don't stop these trolls jmlxg and AvonX are probably the same person, just is obsessed about Intel and yet contradicts what intel spokes people say about their own company. Intel said the CPUs and the industry are slowing down, jmlxg and AvonX said its not true.
jmlxg and AvonX do intel and their representatives a favor and let them tell us what is true and not true about their company.
They need to get baned for all their constant insults on anybody who posts and doesn't agree with them.
1
0
[
Posted by: the_file

|
Date: 10/21/12 09:59:54 PM]
[1-5]