Bookmark and Share


Intel Corp. has slightly changed its Atom roadmap, according to newly released information that cites sources among hardware manufacturers. The company plans to broaden lineup of Atom offerings in order to address different market segments. As a result, next year the company will offer two different Atom product families based on two different micro-architectures and with different generations of graphics processors.

In a bid to address different types of tablets, Intel intends to release code-named Cherry Trail system-on-chips featuring Airmont general-purpose x86 cores as well as eight-generation graphics core in Q3 2014 and Willow Trail SoCs powered by Goldmont micro-architecture as well as ninth-generation graphics engine in Q4 2014, according to DigiTimes web-site. Both Cherry Trail and Willow Trail will be made using 14nm process technology. The new SoCs are expected to support both Google Android and Microsoft Windows operating systems.

Previously, it was generally expected that in 2014 the world’s largest chipmaker would release Atom system-on-chips based on Airmont x86 micro-architecture with eight-generation graphics engine. Apparently, the company decided to accelerate its roadmap and pull-in Goldmont micro-architecture into 2014.

Intel’s roadmap concerning application processors for smartphones seems to be a little less aggressive than the tablet plans. According to market rumours, Intel’s new Merrifield (22nm) system-on-chips is due in late 2013, whereas Moorefield SoC (22nm) is due in the first half of 2014. The first smartphone app processor from Intel to be made using 14nm process technology is called Morganfield and is due in Q1 2015.

Intel did not comment on the news-story.

Tags: Intel, Atom, Cherry Trail, Airmont, Willow Trail, Goldmont, Merrifield, Moorefield, Morganfield, x86, Android, Google


Comments currently: 17
Discussion started: 08/23/13 02:42:11 AM
Latest comment: 08/26/13 05:49:42 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads


Intel's getting desperate against AMD Jaguar cores. How much money will Intel bribe Dell and HP to close down AMD's opportunity?
7 7 [Posted by: linuxlowdown  | Date: 08/23/13 02:42:11 AM]
- collapse thread

A lot! Remember that, during the Pentium 4 days, DELL was the single large computer manufacturer to remain an Intel exclusive partner.

This caused DELL to lose market share and it hurt the company's profits so much that it would have made a loss. Intel then transferred DELL a series of CPU price rebates and a huge marketing kickback and this way DELL was barely in the green.

Anyway, this strategy was a very successful one for Intel as AMD had the absolute performance advantage for 7 consecutive years : from 1999 to 2006.

Amazingly enough, AMD has never managed to capture more than 24% of the x86 CPU market share despite having solutions that were clearly superior to Intel products.

So yes, AMD Jaguar has a very slim chance in the face of the new Atom along with Intel's influence, marketing funds and bribes.
5 4 [Posted by: East17  | Date: 08/23/13 04:45:43 AM]
show the post
1 6 [Posted by: amdzorz  | Date: 08/23/13 10:11:26 AM]

8th generation graphics engine?

1st crap
2nd crap
3rd crap
4th crap
5th crap
6th mediocre
7th mediocre
8th ok
3 1 [Posted by: SteelCity1981  | Date: 08/23/13 11:34:10 AM]

Who will buy these chips ? Any other potential buyer than Microsoft ? Apple and samsung making their own chips iirc ,big part of the market outside apple/samsung is price-conscious and there is no place for intel there i think .

I am not sure how long microsoft will keep making surface tablets also , even microsoft may not be a potential buyer .
0 2 [Posted by: jagd  | Date: 08/24/13 05:18:10 AM]
- collapse thread

there are more than 80 Phone Manufacture in the world anyone of them are potential customer.

Samsung has a product using Intels Atom Processor
2 0 [Posted by: kailrusha  | Date: 08/24/13 06:00:32 AM]
May be there are 80 phone producers but article says these chips for tablets ( not phones ).

?ntel need to find tablet makers with high sale numbers + must offer competitive prices something intel does not like / do . Price per unit alone may kill these chips
0 1 [Posted by: jagd  | Date: 08/24/13 10:35:24 AM]
most of then develop phone and tables. its generalize, surely it will take time to post those 80 manufacturer.

0 0 [Posted by: kailrusha  | Date: 08/26/13 05:49:42 AM]


Add your Comment

Related news

Latest News

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

10:48 pm | LG’s Unique Ultra-Wide Curved 34” Display Finally Hits the Market. LG 34UC97 Available in the U.S. and the U.K.

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

12:52 pm | Lisa Su Appointed as New CEO of Advanced Micro Devices. Rory Read Steps Down, Lisa Su Becomes New CEO of AMD

Thursday, August 28, 2014

4:22 am | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

1:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

10:41 am | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture