Bookmark and Share


UPDATE: The first version of the news-story stated that Intel had no yield issues with 14nm process technology. As it appears, yields were the main reason behind the delay.

Intel Corp. said on Tuesday that it would delay beginning of mass production of its next-generation central processing units code-named Broadwell. The decision was conditioned not only by slow demand for personal computers in general and microprocessors in particular, but also by low yields. The result of the move will be a postponement of the commercial launch of the new chips.

“We continue to make progress with the industry's first 14nm manufacturing process and our second generation 3D transistors. Broadwell, the first product on 14nm is up and running as we demonstrated at Intel Developer Forum, last month. While we are comfortable with where we are at with yields, from a timing standpoint, we are about a quarter behind our projections. As a result, we are now planning to begin production in the first quarter of next year,” said Brian Krzanich, chief executive officer of Intel, during quarterly conference call with financial analysts.

The main reason behind delay of mass production is insufficient yields of chips made using 14nm manufacturing process.

"It was simply a defect density issue. As we develop these technologies, what you do is you are continually improving the defect densities and those results in the yield, the number of die per wafer that you get out as the products. What happens as you insert a set of fixes in groups, you will put four or five, maybe sometimes six or seven fixes into a process and group it together, and run it through and you expect an improvement rate. Occasionally, as you go through that, the fixes do not deliver all of the improvements. We had one of those. […] We have got back now and added additional fixes, gotten back onto that curve, so we have confidence that the problem is fixed, because we have data that it is fixed," explained Mr. Krzanich.

According to the head of Intel, in Q3 of FY2013 its revenue grew 5% sequentially and was flat versus the third quarter of 2012. Meanwhile, year-over-year PC microprocessor volumes “declined slow and were offset by solid growth in the data center and enterprise” businesses. A good news about PC demand is that emerging markets continue to grow and in Q3 2013 well-developed market also demonstrated signs of recovery.

The decision to delay beginning of mass production of its next-generation central processing units code-named Broadwell will help Intel to avoid unnecessary competition between various microprocessor families. At present Intel sells various chips based on Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge and Haswell micro-architectures. Adding fourth family might cause confusion and competition between Intel’s own products.

Traditionally, Intel starts to produce chips using new manufacturing process around October – November in a bid to formally introduce them in Q1 or Q2 the next calendar year. Usually Intel launches new central processing units based on new high-performance micro-architecture for desktops, notebooks, workstations and even single-socket servers at the same time. This will not be the case with chips to be made using 14nm manufacturing technology.

Broadwell chips will only land into mobile computers next year, according to Intel’s plans. For desktops, uniprocessor servers and workstations there will be so-called Haswell Refresh microprocessors made using 22nm fabrication process. As a result, the volumes of 14nm products this year may be lower than traditional output using a new node.

Intel itself has not officially confirmed lack of plans to introduce Broadwell microprocessors for desktops in 2014. It is believed that Broadwell-based products will now be available in the second half of 2014.

Tags: Intel, Broadwell, Core, 14nm, Haswell, 22nm, Semiconductor


Comments currently: 10
Discussion started: 10/16/13 10:38:04 PM
Latest comment: 12/09/15 04:32:12 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads


Its a safe move. AMD already pushed their target for new chips to the same time period.
1 0 [Posted by: KeyBoardG  | Date: 10/16/13 10:38:04 PM]

maybe if intel made some larger strides in cpu development pc sales would not be in a slump.

upgrading to haswell does not make sense for non-existant cpu performance increase, not to mention the thermal issues. What kind of enthusiast will upgrade for the GPU performance increase when they use discrete graphics.
1 2 [Posted by: edlivian  | Date: 10/17/13 12:58:00 AM]
- collapse thread

haswell has nothing to do with performance. it is all about being pushed into a corner by its one competitor... arm.
1 1 [Posted by: amdzorz  | Date: 10/17/13 08:52:31 PM]

maybe if intel would actually produce a processor with real performance gains instead of pushing out a processor for the sake of doing so they wouldn't have 3 generations of cpu chips that closely match each others performance all clustered together in the market right now. Their marketing doesn't help either. They call ivy bridge 3rd generation yet it's no more then a sandy bridge that's shrunk down to 22nm. in reality there should be only 3 generations of the Core I series not 4. Nehalem arch, Sandy Bridge arch and Haswell arch. Then you take the cluster of processor lines intel has and you got another type of confusion as well. As of right now intel as Core i7, Core i5, Core i3, Pentium, Celeron and Atom. I mean honestly, there is no need to for Pentium and Celeron series anymore. Just combine the two since they are soo close to performance with each other and call it the Core i1 series and make it easier for consomers to understand. This is how intel should lay out it's processor line... Core i7 series, highend performance. Core i5 series, midrange performance. Core i3 series, budget performance. Core i1 series, ultra budget performance. Atom series, long battery life for portable devices.
2 1 [Posted by: SteelCity1981  | Date: 10/17/13 01:10:20 AM]
- collapse thread

Noup. They cannot do that. Why? Simple. The Pentium and Celeron processors are actually Core I leftovers with disabled cache, disabled cores, threads, instruction sets, etc, etc; everything that the I series failed when tested. Everything is recycled, nothing is wasted. Just like the GPU's.
0 0 [Posted by: TAViX  | Date: 10/17/13 07:15:06 PM]
haswell has nothing to do with performance. it is all about being pushed into a corner by its one competitor... arm.
0 0 [Posted by: amdzorz  | Date: 10/17/13 08:52:51 PM]

This could be something to do with the decline in sales of PC due to a failure of the O/S. While all sectors of the PC industry are suffering from falling sales it boils down to customers not wanting a tablet inter-phase on their PC's. Also once a software maker enters the hardware market sales drop. The missed opportunity of the chip makers to foresee the emergence of an alternative to the x86 O/S systems is a direct result of backing one O/S maker to their cost.
1 0 [Posted by: tedstoy  | Date: 10/17/13 03:43:53 AM]

also how often does the enterprise need to upgrade their systems when they are running core2quads for checking email and ms word?

ten years ago upgrade cycle was every three years, but now most office environments do not need the speed of a core i5 over their current core2duo and core2quads. They would be better served by switching from hard drives to ssd.
0 0 [Posted by: edlivian  | Date: 10/17/13 08:18:50 PM]

WOW. Q1 2014. AMD @ 28nm. Intel @ 14nm.

0 0 [Posted by: JBG  | Date: 10/18/13 02:22:01 PM]


Add your Comment

Related news

Latest News

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

10:48 pm | LG’s Unique Ultra-Wide Curved 34” Display Finally Hits the Market. LG 34UC97 Available in the U.S. and the U.K.

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

12:52 pm | Lisa Su Appointed as New CEO of Advanced Micro Devices. Rory Read Steps Down, Lisa Su Becomes New CEO of AMD

Thursday, August 28, 2014

4:22 am | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

1:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

10:41 am | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture