<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

News

As we know, AMD eventually planned to utilise its 333MHz system bus with the Athlon XP 2700+ processors and above. However, not is appears that the company will also supply its Athlon XP 2600+ models, also utilising the higher-speed FSB.

The company originally promised to supply 100 thousands of the CPUs with 333MHz processor bus this quarter. As we have reported a lot of times, the company has a lot of problems with increasing the core-clock of the current line of the chips, as a result, it becomes a really tough task for them to launch the high-speed processors in mass-production. Currently the company only manages to supply its Athlon XP 2400+ running at 2000MHz in mass-quantities and the products are not very widely spread on the market yet so to speak. I am not even talking about the 2600+ and 2700+ models that should come later this year. Considering the fact that only the more powerful Athlon XP 2700+ makes use of the faster system bus, we may doubt that AMD will be able to supply 100 thousands of such CPUs on the market due to the present problems with the low yield for the high-speed chips. Nevertheless, AMD may provide some processors with lower frequency, but higher FSB core-clock. This may be the reason why AMD has decided to offer the Athlon XP 2600+ CPUs with the 333MHz FSB.

The official evidence of the Athlon XP 2600+’s existence for the high-speed PSB can be found here at AMD’s web-site. Unfortunately, they do not declare the actual core-speed of the device, but it is likely that it will be a bit lower compared to 2133MHz of the “original” Athlon XP 2600+. It is quite logical to assume that the processors will run at either 2083MHz (x12.5 multiplier) or 2000MHz (x12.0 multiplier).

With the introduction of the Athlon XP 2600+ CPUs with 333MHz system bus AMD will be able to achieve two goals at the same time: to deliver the announced quantity of processors with 333MHz FSB support and to provide more high-speed CPUs without increasing the actual core-speed.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 0

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Friday, November 21, 2008

2:29 pm | IN BRIEF: Qimonda Accuses Seagate, LSI of Patent Infringement. Qimonda Asks ITC to Investigate Alleged Patent Infringements by LSI, Seagate

6:05 am | Sales of Blu-Ray Disc Players Below Expectations, Movie Prices Should Get Cheaper – Sony. Sony Admits: High BD Movie Prices Curtail Sales of Blu-Ray Players

4:12 am | AMD to Release Quad-Core Processor for Notebooks in 2010. AMD’s “Champlain” CPU Set to Emerge in 2010

Thursday, November 20, 2008

3:21 pm | Foxconn Rumoured to Take Over Pegatron, Quit Channel Business. Foxconn May Sacrifice Channel Business for Contract Manufacturing Capacity Expansion

1:43 pm | Intel Plans to Release Discrete Larrabee Graphics Processors in 2009 or 2010. Intel Unsure When to Release Its Standalone Larrabee Graphics Chip

12:09 pm | S3 Graphics Reveals New-Generation Graphics Processor. S3 Unveils GPU with Built-In Audio Core, Starts to Sell Chrome 530 GT Graphics Card

8:29 am | Blu-Ray Disc Players’ Prices Fall Below $150. Relatively Inexpensive Blu-Ray Players Finally Emerge

4:24 am | JEDEC to Set Solid State Drive Standards in 2009. JEDEC Plans to Standardize SSDs Next Year

3:00 am | Elpida May Gain Manufacturing Capacity or May Slowdown Its Further Expansion. Elpida May Plan Surprising Acquisition of Powerchip or ProMOS