Bookmark and Share


A Taiwanese company that entered the graphics card market very recently has reportedly started to sell its graphics cards based on the RADEON 9600 PRO graphics processor with memory speeds lower than specified by ATI Technologies. Journalists from web-site already called such products as the RADEON 9600 PRO Lite.

The graphics cards are made according to the RADEON 9600 PRO reference design, but cost 180 Euros instead of 230 Euros. A very annoying thing about these devices is that their VPU is clocked at 400MHz, just like ATI specified for the RADEON 9600 PRO, whereas memory of the solution works at 400MHz as well, just like specified for the RADEON 9600 (non-PRO). Such hybrid is faster than the latter, but is definitely slower than the original RADEON 9600 PRO. The problem is that they are for sale under the RADEON 9600 PRO brand-name and this misleads customers.

We are trying to find out whether this is actully a lower-end edition of the RADEON 9600 PRO or a new version of the RADEON 9600. Stay tuned.


Comments currently: 7
Discussion started: 06/20/03 12:52:00 PM
Latest comment: 04/13/04 11:09:03 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads


I got one of those. A Ge-Cube 9600PRO revision 1.3 (PCB) clocked at 400/500. It was strange...500 ? i was expecting 400/400 for being a LITE version, but 500 it´s ok :))) so then i realized that the older revision of Ge-Cube, the 1.1, it is clocked at 400/400. What makes me happy is the OVERCLOCK. After adding some heatsinks on the memories, i got an incredible mark of 690 (345x2). Not AS ROCK AS SHOULD BE, some artifacts, but was ok. On 680 i got NO ARTIFACTS. The core after adding thermal grase could be increased up to 460. I am gonna send it to add VMod (+ voltages on VPU and MEM) and change this terrible inneficient cooler, let´s see if can achieve 500...a 9600 XT that´s right ? :) Detail: Samsung, 4ns
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 11/08/03 07:56:48 AM]

I got screwed over by this exact same thing, with a retailer listing the product as a regular PRO. I only found out the turth after installing Rage3d tweak.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 04/11/04 02:17:33 AM]
- collapse thread

Hey there. Thanks for the response. Do you think I should keep it though? Is it a decent card for the money, and will it run
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 04/11/04 08:21:41 AM]
Ok on my system? I mean is the only difference the memory size? and how much difference does that make??? thanks
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 04/11/04 08:38:15 AM]


Add your Comment

Related news

Latest News

Monday, July 28, 2014

6:02 pm | Microsoft’s Mobile Strategy Seem to Fail: Sales of Lumia and Surface Remain Low. Microsoft Still Cannot Make Windows a Popular Mobile Platform

12:11 pm | Intel Core i7-5960X “Haswell-E” De-Lidded: Twelve Cores and Alloy-Based Thermal Interface. Intel Core i7-5960X Uses “Haswell-EP” Die, Promises Good Overclocking Potential

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones