News
 

Bookmark and Share

(7) 

ATI Technologies is hiring some new engineers for its product code-named R600 that is not even likely to appear on the horizon really soon. The move indicates growing aggressiveness in the graphics processors market as well as the belief of the Markham, Ontario-based company in the further growth of the R&D budget that is indissolubly connected with the firm’s sales.

On Sunday, the 25th of April, 2004, The Inquirer web-site reported about the intention of ATI Technologies to hire a team leader to manage Direct 3D driver component quality at its Marlboro plant in the USA. As part of her or his responsibilities, the manager is expected to serve as the primary point of contact within ATI for component quality problems for the Direct 3D driver for the R600 product, according to the report that cited ATI’s official web-site.

However, on Monday, the 25th of April, 2004, ATI Technologies replaced the “R600 code-name” with “next generation products” definition.

While the destiny as well as timeframes for the product code-named R600 are not clear, the advertising indicates that the works on the R600 are underway. Typically it takes graphics company ATI Technologies some 18-24 month to replace one micro-architecture for graphics processors with another, ATI Technologies’ COO indicated in the first half of 2004.

ATI Technologies’ code-named R420 visual processing unit aka RADEON X800 expected to be unleashed shortly is something that rely on the architecture used in the RADEON 9800/9700-series of graphics processors, according to the preliminary information. The followers for the R420, such as the code-named R500 product are expected to bring Shader Model 3.0 or Shader Model 4.0 functionality. It is not clear what new the R600 VPU is supposed to bring.

Discussion

Comments currently: 7
Discussion started: 04/26/04 09:27:41 AM
Latest comment: 06/17/05 07:12:44 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-1]

1. 
give it a rest fanboy
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 04/26/04 03:08:19 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
I am no fan.
I am a programmer and hardware system tester and it make me "smile" hearing this thing's. While some look at spec's and others at performance i see that it's difficult to argue anything, i never see that we would have a Microsoft at hardware. I like them all, but i can recognize the pro/bad of them all.
If at 1997 you want to play movies at your pc i buy a ati card but if i want to play games i buy a 3dfx if i want to "play" with cad a matrox ....
there is always market for every one.

I was playing call of duty and i was a little surprised when i see that it runs on matrox. To bad it's the only besides ati and nvidia.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 04/27/04 05:26:40 AM]
Reply

[1-1]

Add your Comment




Latest News

Thursday, August 21, 2014

10:59 pm | Khronos Group to Follow DirectX 12 with Cross-Platform Low-Level API. Khronos Unveils Next-Generation OpenGL Initiative

10:33 pm | Avexir Readies 3.40GHz DDR4 Memory Modules. DDR4 Could Hit 3.40GHz This Year

12:10 pm | AMD to Lower Prices of A-Series APUs for Back-to-School Season. New Prices of AMD A-Series APUs Revealed

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

10:53 am | AMD to Cut Prices on FX-9000, Other FX Processors: New Prices Revealed. AMD to Make FX Chips More Affordable, Discontinue Low-End Models

10:32 am | LG to Introduce World’s First Curved 21:9 Ultra-Wide Display. LG Brings Curved Displays to Gamers, Professionals

9:59 am | AMD Readies FX-8370, FX-8370E Microprocessors. AMD Preps Two New “Mainstream” FX Chips