Bookmark and Share


As expected, ATI, graphics product group of Advanced Micro Devices, demonstrated its new ATI Radeon HD 3800 X2 graphics card at Consumer Electronics Show 2008. The new graphics card looks bulky, but it promises to demonstrate rather high performance.

ATI Radeon HD 3800 X2 graphics card is the first dual-chip graphics board from AMD’s graphics product group (former ATI Technologies) in many years. The first and the last time when ATI offered dual-chip ATI Rage Fury Maxx graphics card for gamers was back in 1999. That product was not a success, but AMD believes that its new Radeon HD 3800 X2 will face demand from enthusiasts.

The ATI Radeon HD 3800 X2 is based on two ATI Radeon HD 3870 (ATI RV670) graphics processors that work in multi-GPU ATI CrossFireX mode and carries 1GB of memory onboard. The solution has 640 stream processors in total and will fight against Nvidia’s GeForce 8800 Ultra and its successor. Each ATI Radeon HD 3800 X2 graphics accelerators have one ATI CrossFire connector, hence, can work in pairs, enabling 4-way ATI CrossFireX configuration, when four processors work in company to enable rapid rendering speed.

Check out ATI Radeon HD 3800 X2 at Consumer Electronics Show 2008 Gallery

Since all multi-GPU technologies rely on drivers to boost their performance, not all gaming applications will get performance advantage out of two or four chips. Only in the best case scenario all four graphics processing units (GPUs) will work efficiently, whereas in the worst case scenarios only one graphics chip will render the images.

Graphics product group of Advanced Micro Devices yet has to determine the final pricing of its dual-chip solution as well as exact clock-speeds before launching the solutions sometimes in February.


Comments currently: 10
Discussion started: 01/09/08 05:22:23 PM
Latest comment: 01/12/08 12:51:49 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads


Oh boy. I hope for their sake, they manage to work wonders with their next driver releases otherwise this thing won't be worth it at all.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 01/09/08 05:22:23 PM]
- collapse thread

"In 3DMARK06 at 2560X1600 , benchmark scored 9573 ((SM2.0: 4494, SM3.0/HDR:4476). Lower resolution benchmark numbers are not mentioned in the original article".

Sort of disapointing score with such a powerfull CPU. They better hope they get their drivers right this time.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 01/09/08 06:05:42 PM]
did you notice the resolution???
at 1600x1200, 4AA, 8AF the ULTRA gets 28xx with a slightly better CPU (source: tom's hardware charts)

this resolution has almost twice the amount of pixels, but the test was probably done without AA.

so im guessing its 20-30% better than the ultra.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 01/10/08 12:11:18 AM]


Crossfire is theoretically suppose to scale better. Now if a pair of these will run Crysis at 60fps with a min fps of 30 at everything set to max, then I'll be interested.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 01/11/08 02:07:16 PM]


Add your Comment

Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones

Monday, July 21, 2014

10:32 pm | PQI Debuts Flash Drive with Lightning and USB Connectors. PQI Offers Easy Way to Boost iPhone or iPad Storage

10:08 pm | Japan Display Begins to Mass Produce IPS-NEO Displays. JDI Begins to Mass Produce Rival for AMOLED Panels

12:56 pm | Microsoft to Fire 18,000 Employees to Boost Efficiency. Microsoft to Perform Massive Job Cut Ever Following Acquisition of Nokia