News
 

Bookmark and Share

(10) 

Nvidia Corp., the world’s No. 1 supplier of discrete graphics processing units, plans to further reduce pricing of its high-end graphics cards to sustain its market share, market rumours claim. But there are some problems: customers who have already paid for their expensive graphics boards would hardly be happy with price-cut, moreover, manufacturing costs may be too high and Nvidia may not afford a price reduction.

Citing sources among Nvidia add-in-card partners, HotHardware web-site reported that Nvidia plans to lower the price of its flagship GeForce GTX 280 graphics card to $499 from $649 shortly from now. Presently the company’s partners sell less expensive GeForce GTX 260 for $399, however, it is unclear whether the developer plans to reduce the pricing of this model too.

“[The GeForce GTX 280 price] may be a little higher, or potentially even a little lower (than $499), but that [is] something definitely in the works,” an anonymous supplier of graphics cards said in a brief interview with HotHardware web-site.

The GeForce GTX 260 and GTX 280 graphics cards are based on Nvidia G200 graphics processing unit, which is very large in size and is believed to be very expensive to manufacture. Actual graphics cards utilize very advanced power supply chain as well as 512-bit memory bus, thus, they are pretty expensive to make as well. While the exact price of the chip is unknown, it is believed to be over $100, which is a very high price for a chip. Since the manufacturing costs are very high for Nvidia, it is unclear whether the company will make substantial profit selling its high-end products.

Nvidia needs to decrease pricing of its high-end graphics cards as its arch-rival ATI, graphics product group of Advanced Micro Devices, is finally back with high-performance ATI Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 graphics cards that are priced at $199 and $299, respectively. According to performance benchmarks, two ATI Radeon HD 4850 graphics boards quite frequently outperform the GeForce GTX 280 while costing less, which is why many enthusiasts may prefer two higher-end ATI Radeon HD 4870 models over the offering from Nvidia, even despite of the fact that multi-GPU operation heavily relies on drivers.

Earlier this week Nvidia issued a warning regarding its earnings during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

Nvidia did not comment on the news-story.

Discussion

Comments currently: 10
Discussion started: 07/05/08 12:38:04 AM
Latest comment: 07/27/08 12:32:18 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-3]

1. 
Ok

This is getting pathetic

Do your writers not talk to each other ?

In three more games ATI Radeon HD 4850 performs almost as fast as Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/ati-radeon-hd4800-games_12.html#s ect1

but according to your article -

According to performance benchmarks, two ATI Radeon HD 4850 graphics boards quite frequently outperform the GeForce GTX 280

So it looks like you are basing things on someones else benches. I agree the 4850 and 4870 are brilliant cards, but highly unlikely the 4850 out performs the 280 GTX. The 4870 does give it a run for its money

Try these decent articles

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-4870,1964.html
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341

At least you managed to get the spelling and grammar correct for once

0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 07/05/08 04:44:53 AM]
Reply

2. 
Wonder why Ati didn't pump their price, they could have earned some extra margin, isn't that strange for a company in big debt!?

Nice to see Nvidias GTX series becomes affordable, sooner than expected.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 07/05/08 07:44:59 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
I think Ati wants more market share back than profit. They've lost a lot of market share to Nvidia since the X1900 days when Ati was king. No doubt the agressive pricing is an attempt to gain some of that back.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 07/05/08 08:43:06 AM]
Reply

3. 
this is bad news for people who just bought their gtx 280...and in my opinion, i think nvidia got very complacent and underestimated amd this round. either way, its good news for us all cause these cards just got a lot cheaper.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 07/08/08 12:58:08 AM]
Reply

[1-3]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Monday, August 4, 2014

4:04 pm | HGST Shows-Off World’s Fastest SSD Based on PCM Memory. Phase-Change Memory Power’s World’s Fastest Solid-State Drive

Monday, July 28, 2014

6:02 pm | Microsoft’s Mobile Strategy Seem to Fail: Sales of Lumia and Surface Remain Low. Microsoft Still Cannot Make Windows a Popular Mobile Platform

12:11 pm | Intel Core i7-5960X “Haswell-E” De-Lidded: Twelve Cores and Alloy-Based Thermal Interface. Intel Core i7-5960X Uses “Haswell-EP” Die, Promises Good Overclocking Potential

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones