News
 

Bookmark and Share

(2) 

Nvidia Corp. has quietly added two graphics cards into entry-level OEM family. One of the graphics cards – the model 310 – is just a renamed GeForce 210, whereas another one – the model 205 – seems to be the lowest-performing possible discrete graphics card available today that will hardly beat even Intel’s latest integrated graphics solutions.

Specifications of Nvidia GeForce 310 are exactly the same as those of the GeForce 210, the number of stream processors as well as clock-speeds of the “novelty” are exactly the same, so is theoretical performance. Perhaps, the model 310 will get additional software-based capabilities, e.g., support for CUDA and/or PhysX, otherwise, this is the most controversial rename of a product by Nvidia.

The GeForce 205 graphics processing unit (GPU) seems to be a true blast from the past: the solution features 8 stream processors at 1402MHz clock-speed, 4 texture units and 4 render back ends operating at 589MHz frequency as well as 64-bit memory controller to provide up to 8GB/s of bandwidth. Specifications of the product resemble those of GeForce FX 5600/5700, performance-mainstream products from 2003. Obviously, the novelty sports DirectX 10.1, OpenGL 3.1, Nvidia PureVideo and so on; however, with extremely low performance this solution will slower than integrated graphics solutions from ATI/AMD, Nvidia itself or even Intel Corp.’s GMA 4500HD.

Ironically, Nvidia’s own web-page dedicated to the model 205 claims that “Every PC needs good graphics”, a very disputable statement, considering that performance-wise the solution should be close to something discrete that is six year old. The release of GeForce 205 seems to be Nvidia’s desperate attempt to address the market of very low-end graphics solutions for Intel’s latest Core i7, Core i5 and Core i3 platforms. The move is rather strange, considering the fact that in less than two month time Intel launches Core i5 and Core i3 chips with advanced built-in graphics cores, which are more than likely to beat Nvidia’s GeForce 205.

Both GeForce 205 and GeForce 310 are aimed only at OEMs and will be available only inside branded systems.

Tags: Nvidia, Geforce, G218, 40nm

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 11/27/09 07:55:29 AM
Latest comment: 11/27/09 04:49:09 PM

[1-2]

1. 
Pretty pathetic when nVIDIA is actually making attempts to compete with Intel's onboard graphics. I guess they gave up against ATi.
0 0 [Posted by: JonMCC33  | Date: 11/27/09 07:55:29 AM]
Reply

2. 
I call this Cheat .
0 0 [Posted by: SALEM80  | Date: 11/27/09 04:49:09 PM]
Reply

[1-2]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

8:15 pm | AMD Unveils Server Strategy and Roadmap. AMD Adds Berlin, Seattle and Warsaw Processors into Roadmap

7:38 pm | Nvidia Set to Radically Change Business Model, License Graphics Cores to Others. Nvidia Takes ARM, Imagination Technologies Route, Intends to License Kepler Graphics Tech

Monday, June 17, 2013

11:57 pm | Oculus VR Raises $16 Million in Funding from Venture Capital Funds. Venture Capitalists Invest into Oculus VR Virtual Reality Platform

11:48 pm | Accelerators and Co-Processors Set to Dominate Big Data at High Performance Computing Sites . IDC: Intel Xeon Phi and Nvidia Tesla Running Neck to Neck to Supercomputer Leadership

11:33 pm | Microsoft and Best Buy to Open Up Over 600 Windows Stores. Microsoft and Best Buy to Open Up Stores-Within-A-Store

11:21 pm | Intel Haswell-E to Pack Eight Cores, Quad-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller. Intel Preps Series Performance Boost with Next Year’s Enthusiast Desktop Platform

5:08 pm | Sony Ups PlayStation 4 Internal Shipments Projections. Sony: Demand for PlayStation 4 Will Exceed Supply

1:41 pm | Intel Unleashes Next-Generation Xeon Phi “Knights Landing” Co-Processor. Intel Unveils 14nm Xeon Phi “Knights Landing” Chip

12:40 pm | Samsung Reveals Ultra-Fast PCI-Express SSD for Ultra-Slim Notebook PCs. Samsung’s PCIe SSD for Notebooks Has 1400MB/s Read Speed

10:41 am | AMD FX-9000 Family Microprocessors Cost from $500 to $1000. Pricing of AMD FX-9000 Processors Mimics Pricing of Intel HEDT Products