News
 

Bookmark and Share

(12) 

Intel Corp.'s next-generation graphics core integrated into code-named Ivy Bridge microprocessor will not only bring-in support for DirectX 11 and performance improvements, but will also include support for resolutions that are well beyond full high-definition (1920*1080, FHD) as well as support for decoding of video streams in beyond FHD resolutions.

Nowadays most graphics adapters support maximum resolution of 2560*1600 pixels per display (WQXGA), which is considerably higher than full-HD (1080p, FHD), one of the most popular resolutions of our times. However, a number of companies are already working on technologies like quad-FHD (3840*2160, QFHD) and even ultra high-definition (7680*4320, UHD, UHDTV or Super Hi-Vision [SHV]). Cameras and screens capable of filming and displaying QFHD and UHD video are very rare these days, but they do exist: earlier this year Sharp demonstrated a direct-view 85" LCD display capable of 7680*4320 pixels at 10 bpp. Therefore, it is pretty clear that there is a need for support of resolutions higher than WQXGA.

With the launch of its code-named Ivy Bridge chips in March-April, 2011, Intel will bring support for 4096*2304 per display resolution (so-called 4K resolution) by a consumer-class graphics adapter. Moreover, the multi-format codec engine (MFX) of Ivy Bridge will support decoding of video in 4096*4096 resolution.

While at present there are hardly a lot of 4096*2304 or 4096*4096 videos, Intel believes that it is indeed the future: commercially available professional cameras like Red Digital Cinema Camera Company can capture videos in such resolutions, whereas YouTube announced at VidCon 2010 its support for 4K video.

Intel may not be the only company to support 4K resolution next year. Designers of discrete graphics adapters - Advanced Micro Devices and Nvidia Corp. - are also likely to support beyond FHD resolutions shortly as they are usually on the pinnacle of the progress. What remains to be seen is support for QFHD [3840*2160] or 4K resolutions by makers of consumer and professional displays. At present there are just a small number of 27" and 30" monitor models with support WQXGA [2560*1600] and WQHD [2560*1440], resolutions that have been around for over five years now. Nonetheless, Intel probably expects monitors with higher resolutions to emerge sometimes in 2012 - 2013 timeframe.

In about nine months, Intel shipped 75 million Core i-series "Sandy Bridge" processors. Provided that the ramp up of Ivy Bridge will be slightly more aggressive, there will be around 100 million of Ivy Bridge microprocessors shipped by early 2013, which means that around 100 million of Intel-based PCs will be 4K capable in around 16 months from now. The number will clearly encourage display makers to release their products with beyond WQXGA/WQHD resolutions support.

Tags: Intel, Ivy Bridge, UHD, Core, Sandy Bridge, 22nm

Discussion

Comments currently: 12
Discussion started: 09/20/11 11:27:10 AM
Latest comment: 09/23/11 07:53:27 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-7]

1. 
This just seems like a gimmick from Intel. I mean when is video of that resolution going to be around, at least another 3 years when the next xbox releases? By then these will be antiquated POS. Also can these even play 4k video and if they can, what did they cut corners with on the decoding side.(not like companys haven't done that before....)
2 1 [Posted by: evernessince  | Date: 09/20/11 11:27:10 AM]
Reply

2. 
Hope the did resolve the 24fps issue
1 0 [Posted by: Marburg U  | Date: 09/20/11 11:48:16 AM]
Reply

3. 
Just another marketing check box on Intel's list that no one cares about. Wake me up in 10 years when you can buy a $300 27 inch LCD monitor with that resolution and when an APU can actually support a game at such rez! Ya right.
4 0 [Posted by: BestJinjo  | Date: 09/20/11 04:34:41 PM]
Reply

4. 
Worthless. Even @ 1080p, on a 100" screen, your eye can't resolve the pixels from > 6 feet away. And if you need to be closer than 6 feet than you have serious issues. On a 24" monitor you can't resolve it if you are > 18" away. Doubling the angular resolution pitch will cut the down to 9". Who sits 9" from their monotor?
1 0 [Posted by: digitalgriffin  | Date: 09/20/11 05:23:02 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
I have a 1680x1050 19" LCD monitor, and I can make out individual pixels at 3 feet with blurry eyes. I think you need to have your eyes checked. It's not unusual for me to be 9" from my monitors either. Dealing with databases and a lot of data, I sometimes have screenfuls of information at the tiniest font sizes, and I would love to push my font size past something that looks like Tetris blocks. Letters look awfully similar at 3x5 pixels.

Aside from a brief run of a 40-48Hz, insanely priced 3840x2400 LCD, the maximum available resolution hasn't changed in over 7 years, when it went from 2304x1440 to 2560x1600. You can live with your last-century 1080p resolutions if you want (the 1999 ViewSonic P817 beats it with 2048x1536 @85Hz), but I'm hoping to see more improvement.
0 0 [Posted by: jbo5112  | Date: 09/20/11 10:33:40 PM]
Reply
 
you got it backwards the smaller the screen is the less visible pixilated it can become the larger the picture the more visible pixilated it can become .
0 0 [Posted by: SteelCity1981  | Date: 09/21/11 01:00:31 PM]
Reply

5. 

Geez, lighten up y'all. You're acting like it's bad bad bad to be ahead on that curve already, and while games won't come in such resolutions for the next few years, multi-monitor setups will if they haven't already.
0 0 [Posted by: sanity  | Date: 09/20/11 07:56:33 PM]
Reply

6. 
Resolution is just one thing, bit-rate is much more important.
The full HD videos on youtube are blocky joke.
Internet already cant deliver high bit-rate 1080p videos.
0 0 [Posted by: Zool  | Date: 09/21/11 12:59:10 AM]
Reply

7. 
More rubbish from the Intel BS dept
1 0 [Posted by: alpha0ne  | Date: 09/22/11 12:52:55 AM]
Reply

[1-7]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

8:52 pm | Lisa Su Appointed as New CEO of Advanced Micro Devices. Rory Read Steps Down, Lisa Su Becomes New CEO of AMD

Thursday, August 28, 2014

12:22 pm | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

9:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

6:41 pm | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture

Monday, August 25, 2014

6:05 pm | Chinese Inspur to Sell Mission-Critical Servers with AMD Software, Power 8 Processors. IBM to Enter Chinese Big Data Market with the Help from Inspur