News

Despite of all advantages Intel Corp. endowed its new BTX form-factor, mainboard makers are note really enthusiastic about the emerging standard. There are very few BTX mainboards at Computex Taipei 2004 show, which may indicate pretty tough times for BTX.

Introduced in September 2003, the BTX form-factor for computer cases and mainboards is developed to succeed the widely-used ATX architecture. The main idea behind BTX is to optimize the design of mainboard in order to allow more efficient cooling by placing central processing unit, memory controller hub and graphics card in a way that all of them would be blown by the same flow of air. This ensures that no more than one fan is required for a typical PC, but still provides efficient cooling.

Even though BTX does bring some interesting capabilities for system builders, mainboard makers do not seem to be really enthusiastic about the first version of technology and are likely to stick to ATX variations this year. Unofficial sources indicated that Intel had been constantly tweaking its Balanced Technology eXtended, which encouraged them to wait for the final specifications before jumping on the bandwagon.

The majority of mainboard makers consider BTX launch for late Q3 or Q4 2004, when everything will be finalized. However, in case Intel adds more changes to the form-factor, the adoption of BTX is only likely to ramp in 2005.

No officials commented on the report.

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 06/04/04 09:28:47 PM
Latest comment: 06/06/04 03:55:06 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-3]

1. 
I guess Intel doesn't have as much say in the market as it did during AT to ATX change.
[Posted by: kodiak81  | Date: 06/04/04 09:28:47 PM]

2. 
The power features of ATX were too good to pass up. That was a step forward. BTX doesn't offer the end user much. BTX can claim has better cooling potential - but this feature would be ncessary because Intel's chip engineering team is runing into heat problems. Which is their problem. And needs to be solved through better engineering. Not BTX. This is a step sideways. And the Motherboard makes know it.

I say, good decision.
[Posted by: 9Nails  | Date: 06/04/04 09:57:24 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

3. 
Yeah this new dwsign is even worse then ATX in many ways. Moving memory away from CPU is certanly bad for meory latency. I think BTX should be passed and something better should be developed.
[Posted by: Drenaža  | Date: 06/05/04 02:38:30 AM]

[1-3]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS