<%BANNER[vz_728x90]%>
<%BANNER[vz_468x60]%>
<%BANNER[vz_300x250]%>

News

<%BANNER[vz_120x600]%>

A recent survey by X-bit labs has found that while there are still a lot of mainboard producers, the most popular among computer enthusiasts is Asustek Computer and no other motherboard maker can boast with similar popularity. Despite of aggressive marketing campaigns, popularity of the “new age” suppliers of computer platforms is similar to Asrock, a low-cost arm of Asus.

According to the results of the poll, mainboards from Asustek Computer are preferred by 44.1% of respondents, an unprecedented result. Companies like Gigabyte Technology, Abit and DFI have much lower support: 13.1%, 10.3% and 9%, respectively. MicroStar International, another large maker of motherboards, is preferred by 6.9% of those, who participated in the survey. The remaining mainboard makers are not popular among computer enthusiasts.

It is interesting to note that in spite of truly aggressive marketing campaign and media acclaims of “Designed by Nvidia” mainboards based on the company’s nForce 680i chipset and its derivatives, popularity of such brands as EVGA, XFX and BFG Technology is pretty low: only 2.5%, 0.5% and 0.3% respectively of the poll participants would choose a motherboard from them. Even mainboards from Intel can claim support of 3.8%.

The results of the survey generally reflect the market trends, when larger makers of computer platforms can deliver products that have better feature-set and quality compared to products smaller suppliers may deliver. However, there is an interesting exception: only 0.7% of polled would choose a mainboard from Foxconn, who is one of the world’s largest producers of electronics. Such situation can be explained by the fact that the brand is relatively young and Foxconn has not been really aggressive in promoting it. Another reason could be in the fact that even computer enthusiasts cannot get really familiar with the company’s product lineup, as the firm’s model names used to be very hard to hard to understand until very recently, when the company reconsidered its model naming scheme (e.g, 975X7AB-2.0-8EKRS2H vs. P35A).

X-bit labs polled over 5500 of its readers in the second half of May and in the first half of June, 2007.

<%BANNER[vz_bottom]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 7
Discussion started: 06/14/07 06:33:03 AM
Latest comment: 06/21/07 10:14:31 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-6]

1. 
I can remember like maybe 6 or 7 years ago when I just went with whichever was the better MB between Abit and Asus. It's not even close now. The only times I don't get an Asus is when I have to throw something cheap together quickly.

MBs are like HDs. You stick with what's worked for you in the past, but there's always a chance of getting unlucky with one, no matter what brand.

Asus isn't immune to un-catchy naming schemes either. I always have to look at my Newegg invoice to remember which exact model my latest motherboard is.
[Posted by: lonechicken | Date: 06/14/07 06:33:03 AM]

2. 
The naming scheme has FA to do with Foxconn's poor sales, any enthusiast with even very basic experience knows to research a product before buying and a quick search will show the majority of their boards to be OK for office but they are certainly not an enthusiast part

That said, Asus boards are also becoming worse and worse and the only reason why they are so successful is due to the other brands are even worse eg. Abit...............they still make quite good boards with far better PWM than Anus but the last couple of years their bios writing dept. have been on holiday
[Posted by: alpha0ne | Date: 06/14/07 07:43:28 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

3. 
I prefer Abit and maybe Gigabyte because they provide hardware that works in wide variety of OS. I careless for overclocking and extra junk on the motherboard.

Asus still has poor quality connectors and boards.
[Posted by: linuxnerd | Date: 06/14/07 11:58:42 PM]

4. 
Not sure why asus won. It's way too overhyped IMO. Gigabyte is much better.
[Posted by: Stalker | Date: 06/15/07 12:05:05 AM]

5. 
being a system builder for 7+ years, I find out that, Giga run fine after you put everything on it, or it just a brand new dead giga. Asus need couple days to "warm up", then last forever! but at the same time u will seeing giga coming back 1 by 1.
for most of peoples they define the quality is "plug n go", which giga certerntly win. but for experts, that's only half of it's meaning, it need many years to win their hearts.
most fault of Asus is software issue, like recently has major problem on "out dated" bios. but for experts that isn't a problem, they can fix it by themself. of cause, they enjoy doing that.
and for the performance, the experts only focus on chipsets. brand of M/B? ohh come on, pay more then get more, isn't that simple?!
I pick asus, why? besides quality, I was happy to see on their support: "yes, we use a unstable capacitor on that board, please..."
[Posted by: livelee | Date: 06/15/07 11:17:21 AM]

6. 
Asus has been big with PC builders, including me, for quite a while now (you knew it was coming) BUT, with recent developments of their nForce chipset series, buyers are not very happy. I bought an Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe last year and have had nothing but problems with it. I figured it was a fluke, but the Asus forums pretty much proves that there are many, many flukes out there. I eventually had to call Asus for support due to constant BSODs out of nowhere; it had been running "good" for a few months and took a turn for the worse. On calling them, they made me pay shipping, close to $10 US, for a replacement BIOS chip and a post-it note for instructions. I installed the new BIOS chip and it didn't help, still Asus refuses to replace the board which is under warranty claiming I put the chip in wrong, no caring that the mobo still runs, when it wants to.

I am now shopping for a new motherboard, and looked into the Striker Extreme from Asus. And I thought the forums for the M2N-SLI Deluxe were frightful! At the Striker Extreme forum at Asus' site someone called and got a top Asus executive's address and posted it for everyone because the only posts on the forum not labeled [Problem] are people suggesting different mobos to replace the ill-mannered Striker Extreme.

I have used Asus boards for over 6 years now, usually buying the best one available at the time. I know there are always a percentage of people who get a bad board, but Asus seems to be dropping their commitment to high-end buyers because they still win the popularity polls like this one.

[Posted by: MrMoboRising | Date: 06/21/07 10:14:31 PM]

[1-6]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Monday, December 1, 2008

2:23 pm | Microsoft Readies Software Rasterizer for Windows 7. Microsoft Windows 7 to Get Software Emulator for DirectX 10, DirectX 10.1

8:45 am | Asustek Promises OLPC XO Competitor in Q1 2009. Asus Eee PC Version with $200 Price-Tag Scheduled for Q1

Sunday, November 30, 2008

11:14 pm | IN BRIEF: Intel Teams Up with Taiwanese Makers to Tap Digital Signage Market. Intel and Taiwanese Makers Form Digital Signage SIG Joint Venture

10:39 pm | Consumers Plan to Spend the Same or More This Holiday Season – Research Firm. Consumer Technology Spending Will Stay Flat or Will Grow, Claims ABI Research

10:21 pm | Intel Stresses Again: Netbook is Not a Notebook Replacement. Intel Admits Underestimation of Netbook Popularity on Developed Markets

1:55 pm | Dell Readies Notebooks with Two Central Processing Units. Dell Plans to Install Chips from ARM and Intel