News
 

Bookmark and Share

(4) 

Despite of various demonstrations of how additional NAND flash cache can improve performance of modern computers and take advantage of Microsoft Windows Vista additional capabilities, mainboard makers are still reluctant to install appropriate hardware on their products.

Intel Turbo Memory (previously code-named Robson) technology allows Microsoft Windows Vista to pre-cache certain types of data and speed up its loading by using special NAND flash-based cache. The new operating system features an array of technologies, including SuperFetch, ReadyBoost, ReadyDrive, and ReadyBoot that can take advantage of the flash cache, which can also be located on a system’s hard disk drive.

But Intel Turbo Memory does not come for free. At this point makers of mainboards can either install a special Turbo Memory 1GB module for desktops, which costs $23, or install a special type of Intel’s I/O controllers and a flash memory chip. The latter option would cost motherboard makers considerably less: up to $3 for a south bridge and from $7 to $10 a 1GB flash chip or chips.

But even a tiny addition to a mainboard’s price in the current market conditions make motherboards makers upset and unenthusiastic about the success of the technology. According to a news-story at DigiTimes web-site, several motherboard makers think the performance boost from Turbo Memory is not obvious, and therefore they predict the technology will only attract high-end users in the desktop market. Perhaps, mainboard makers bet on hybrid disk drives, which also include flash cache.

Neither Intel, nor officials for mainboard makers commented on the news-story.

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 06/14/07 06:45:42 AM
Latest comment: 06/17/07 03:46:38 AM

[1-2]

1. 
Isn't Turbo Memory Intel's answer to Hypertransport?
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 06/14/07 06:45:42 AM]
Reply

2. 
Why don't they just put a few Gig's of fast flash on a small card to put into one of the unused PCIe x1 slots, so customers can elect to buy it separately if they want the extra boost, and who doesn't have an unused PCIe x1 slot?
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 06/15/07 07:33:53 PM]
Reply

[1-2]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

8:15 pm | AMD Unveils Server Strategy and Roadmap. AMD Adds Berlin, Seattle and Warsaw Processors into Roadmap

7:38 pm | Nvidia Set to Radically Change Business Model, License Graphics Cores to Others. Nvidia Takes ARM, Imagination Technologies Route, Intends to License Kepler Graphics Tech

Monday, June 17, 2013

11:57 pm | Oculus VR Raises $16 Million in Funding from Venture Capital Funds. Venture Capitalists Invest into Oculus VR Virtual Reality Platform

11:48 pm | Accelerators and Co-Processors Set to Dominate Big Data at High Performance Computing Sites . IDC: Intel Xeon Phi and Nvidia Tesla Running Neck to Neck to Supercomputer Leadership

11:33 pm | Microsoft and Best Buy to Open Up Over 600 Windows Stores. Microsoft and Best Buy to Open Up Stores-Within-A-Store

11:21 pm | Intel Haswell-E to Pack Eight Cores, Quad-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller. Intel Preps Series Performance Boost with Next Year’s Enthusiast Desktop Platform

5:08 pm | Sony Ups PlayStation 4 Internal Shipments Projections. Sony: Demand for PlayStation 4 Will Exceed Supply

1:41 pm | Intel Unleashes Next-Generation Xeon Phi “Knights Landing” Co-Processor. Intel Unveils 14nm Xeon Phi “Knights Landing” Chip

12:40 pm | Samsung Reveals Ultra-Fast PCI-Express SSD for Ultra-Slim Notebook PCs. Samsung’s PCIe SSD for Notebooks Has 1400MB/s Read Speed

10:41 am | AMD FX-9000 Family Microprocessors Cost from $500 to $1000. Pricing of AMD FX-9000 Processors Mimics Pricing of Intel HEDT Products