News

Asustek Computer plans to enable 1600MHz quad pumped processor system bus on its mainboards based on Intel X38 core-logic, whereas earlier it was rumoured that Intel only intends to enable such speed bin for Intel X48 platform. Given that the world’s largest maker of mainboards would hardly compromise stability of its products, it is unclear why Intel preps two platforms with generally similar features.

Asustek’s P5E, P5E3 Deluxe and Maximus Formula (Special Edition) motherboards, which are already listed at Asus’ web-site, will support processors with 1600MHz processor system bus (PSB) officially, despite of the fact that Intel has not formally introduced or announced desktop central processing units with such PSB speed-bin. According to unofficial information, processors with 1600MHz bus will be supported by Intel’s X48 core-logic due out early next year, though, it is uncertain whether enthusiasts bite it, provided that they have the same features on the Intel X38.

Besides officially supporting Intel Core 2 Duo, Intel Core 2 Quad, Intel Core 2 Extreme and other LG775 processors with up to 1600MHz PSB, Asus P5E and Asus P5E3 Deluxe/WiFi-AP@n will also dual-channel feature DDR2 or DDR3 along with Asustek’s proprietary technologies that boost functionality and performance of motherboards.

Intel X38 chipset will bring the technological “creams” of 2007. It will support dual-channel PC3-10600 (DDR3 1333MHz) with Intel Fast Memory access, PCI Express 2.0 bus with multi-GPU technology capability and some other performance improvements, such as flexible overclocking capabilities and extreme memory profiles (XMP) technology. The X48 chipset reportedly due in early 2008 will add support for 1600MHz PSB along with PC3-12800 (DDR3 1600MHz).

Though, given that Intel has not introduced the X48, it may also feature certain additional technologies that will create more selling points to the updated platform for extreme desktops for overclockers. For example, the new platform could bring-in multi-GPU or multi-CPU capability. Currently Intel’s chipsets only support ATI CrossFire multi-GPU technology, whereas Nvidia SLI tech is only supported by Intel’s Skulltrail platform as well as Nvidia’s proprietary platforms.

Discussion

Comments currently: 5
Discussion started: 10/01/07 09:04:20 PM
Latest comment: 01/20/08 02:38:47 AM

[1-5]

1. 
yea.....
how about we cut all that down, take out everthing but the basics (pci-E x16 (2-3 slots), 4 or so SATA, a few USB's and a good voltage regulator, a nice bios and maybe raid 0/1/1+0 with a nice 10/100/1000 port. Oh, im sure without all the exess crap (IFMA, XMP, etc...) we would finaly have a motherboard with a low cost, and INSANE overclocking capability.

but no...we HAVE TO HAVE XMP and IFMA and RAID 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/90/1941/1351/6247/38248 and JBOD along with 35925 ports, 24 unkown functions 1031142526 unused bios options and a gajjilion other options that no one even uses 99% of the 100% time.

/end rage at motherboard makers/designers.

(p.s. include IDE->SATA converters with your SATA only motherboards k thx.)
[Posted by: Joz  | Date: 10/01/07 09:04:20 PM]

2. 
Wow, neat comedians there at ASUS...
From what Ive heard, the X38 WAS MADE FOR supporting 1600 MHz FSB

@ above: =)
[Posted by: 1234  | Date: 10/02/07 11:09:00 AM]

3. 
AMD memory bandwidth advantage on desktop nullified. Intel is going ahead with guns blazing. What will be the next FSB? 2133MHz?
[Posted by: Not A Fanboi  | Date: 10/02/07 01:59:40 PM]

4. 
1600 MHz FSB should not be problem even for P965 chipset. In fact overclocked Core2Duos are working with such FSB (mine E6320 only with 1400 MHz, but 350 MHzx7 is limitation of my particular CPU). Earlier Asus and abit have introduced support for 1333 MHz FSB CPUs, releasing updated BIOSes for their mainboards, so support for 1600 MHz in X38 is not big surprise.
[Posted by: Konrad  | Date: 10/03/07 12:37:18 PM]

5. 
I really wish they would just skip to the memory controllers they use on the graphics cards. The graphics cards are already using memory in the Gigabyte range, so why not just design a GPU just like a CPU (drop in replacement) and tie the whole system into one memory bus with the fastest memory on the market?

All these disparate systems require wait states because of timing issues and latencies of going from one bus to another bus, and yet another bus. They really need to just make the chip set support ddr5/rambus/etc and just get it over with. The price difference wouldn't be that much as far as memory goes, plus it would speed the entire PC platform up considerably enough to warrant this action.
[Posted by: roadrun777  | Date: 01/20/08 02:38:47 AM]

[1-5]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Monday, November 9, 2009

3:54 pm | Microprocessor Unit Shipments Grow 23% in Q3 2009 – Market Tracking Firm. AMD Continues to Lose Share to Intel As Market Shows Gains

6:56 am | Globalfoundries Set to Become World’s Second Largest Foundry in Two Years – ATIC. ATIC: The First Chip Foundry in Abu Dhabi to Emerge in Four Years

Sunday, November 8, 2009

11:56 pm | Nokia to Replace Faulty Chargers. Nokia Initiates Charger Exchange Program

10:51 pm | Nvidia’s Chief Executive Says “No” to Globalfoundries, Microprocessors. Nvidia Denies Intentions to Use Globalfoundries, Develop Own Central Processing Units

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future