News

Despite of expectations, memory prices are unlikely to increase due to ongoing ramp of DRAM shipments by world’s leading maker of memory used in computers, claims Nam Hyung Kim, a principal analyst with iSuppli Corp., an El Segundo, California-based research firm.

Memory makers have reportedly tried to reallocate manufacturing capacities from DRAM to more profitable flash or other components, which limited supply growth of DRAM in May, June and July, causing an uptick in pricing. In August, however, leading memory makers, such as Samsung, Hynix, Micron and Infineon, started to ramp up supplies of memory for personal computers by substantial percent, which is likely to cause memory pricing plunge.

Earlier this year memory makers and analysts warned about soaring DRAM prices, citing back-to-school and Christmas seasons as the main drivers for the demand increase for dynamic random access memory. However, iSuppli analyst, whose column is published by Silicon Strategies web-site, believed that raising shipments will not allow DRAM prices to soar.

In late July, 2004, a number of memory makers, including ProMOS and Micron, expected DRAM pricing to uptick in Fall as a result of skyrocketing demand from PC makers. However, the warnings are unlikely to materialize, at least in the next few weeks, due to increased supply of DRAM chips.

At press time average price of 256Mb DDR SDRAM memory chip (266MHz or 400MHz) was $4.13 to $4.43 at spot-market, according to DRAMeXchange. The lowest contract price on 256Mb DRAMs was $4.31. In late July 256Mb memory modules cost from $4.71 to $4.77 at spot-market, while the lowest contract price on them was $4.50 per unit. At the end of May, 2004, spot market’s average price of 256Mb DDR memory chips was $4.80, while this year’s peak was at $6.30 per device in early April.

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 08/26/04 08:23:42 AM
Latest comment: 08/28/04 12:25:51 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-3]

1. 
Are prices supposed to "Plummet" or remain relatively unchanged?? This article isn't clear at all.
[Posted by: jpr00703  | Date: 08/26/04 08:23:42 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

2. 
So are we finally going to see the axe taken to DDR2 prices on a memory type that performs worse than the old, costs less to build than the old, and yet for reasons of lining pockets, is priced higher than the old?

[Posted by: Anemone  | Date: 08/26/04 04:01:10 PM]

3. 
About damn time!
[Posted by: Soyoman  | Date: 08/28/04 12:25:51 AM]

[1-3]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Friday, July 3, 2009

5:50 pm | Apple Reminds: iPhone and iPod Overheat at 35 Degrees Celcius. Apple Issues Warning Concerning Overheating

1:09 pm | Former Intel’s Chief Does Not Expect Quick Results from Intel-Nokia Pact. Feasibility of Intel’s and Nokia’s Partnership to Be Clear in Several Years

9:15 am | Nvidia's Chief Executive Publicly Unveils Pricing of "Ion" Core-Logic. Nvidia’s Ion Platform Appears to Be Up to Three Times More Expensive than Intel’s

Thursday, July 2, 2009

11:42 pm | Transcend Equips Memory Modules with Thermal Sensors. Transcend's New Memory Modules Can Monitor Their Temperature

10:17 pm | AMD Will Not Support Nvidia's CUDA Technology. AMD Not Interested in Supporting Nvidia's CUDA

3:46 pm | Sony Claims that UMD-Less PlayStation Portable Was Always In The Plans. Sony's Claims Raises Question Whether UMD Ever Was a Compulsory Element of PSP

12:43 pm | DDR3 to Capture 30% of the Market by Year End - DRAMeXchange. Contract DDR3 Prices to Increase in July