Bookmark and Share

Tags

32nm 40nm 45nm AMD Apple ASUS ATI ATIC Atom Business Cypress E-Book Evergreen Fermi Flash Geforce Globalfoundries GT300 Intel Microsoft Nforce Nokia Nvidia Radeon Semiconductor Sony SSD TSMC USB Windows

News

OCZ Technology, a leading maker of memory modules for enthusiasts, said Wednesday it had managed to shrink latencies of its high-speed DDR2 memory modules to timings that are normal for DDR memory. Lowered latencies on standard speed memory mean that users will be able to enjoy increased performance without overclocking any component.

“It is much easier to document raw clock speed and its theoretical bandwidth than the performance increase achieved by low access latencies; however, the latter is what really matters for the ultimate gaming and multimedia performance,” said Dr. Michael Schuette, vice president of technology development at OCZ Technology.

OCZ’s PC2-5400 EL DDR2 Platinum Edition XTC memory modules are capable of working at 667MHz with CL3-3-3-15 timings, unbelievably low latency settings for modules at such a high-speed. But the memory modules have to run at 2.1V voltage setting, which exceeds standard voltage for DDR2 chips by 0.3V, a significant difference.

The new modules also feature XTC heat-spreaders, honeycomb-like radiators made of aluminum, which dissipates heat rather quickly. OCZ claims that honey-comb like design has higher surface area than conventional solid heat-spreaders, while the perforations allow convection to even more effectively reduce heat.

The new memory product will be available in 512MB modules and 1GB dual-channel memory kits.

“Memory access latencies are the pivotal factor for system performance. The new PC2-5400 EL DDR2 Platinum Edition XTC fills this void by offering faster access times than even the lowest latency DDR400 modules in the market,” Mr. Schuette added.

Discussion

Comments currently: 1
Discussion started: 04/06/06 09:23:06 PM
Latest comment: 04/06/06 09:23:06 PM

[1-1]

1. 
Perhaps the best way to measure "latency" is in (nano)seconds, not clockcycles.

666Mhz * 3 cycles == 1 / 222Mhz

versus

400Mhz * 2 cycles == 1 / 200Mhz
[Posted by: DDopson  | Date: 04/06/06 09:23:06 PM]

[1-1]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

4:04 pm | Imagination Intros Processors for “Internet Everywhere” Consumer Electronics. Imagination Presents Connected Processors for CE Devices

3:33 pm | Sub-$99 Blu-Ray Players Black Friday Deals Available, But Not a Lot. Walmart to Sell BD Players for $78 on Black Friday

12:27 pm | Microsoft Sued for Banning Third-Party Xbox Memory Cards. Memory Cards Supplier Sues Microsoft

11:55 am | OCZ to Release External USB 3.0 Solid-State Drive. OCZ USB 3.0 SSD Incoming for Consumer Electronics Show

7:52 am | Nvidia’s CEO Expects Underpowered Mobile Devices to Gain Popularity. PC of the Future – Web-Based Device with 4G Connectivity, Says Chief Exec of Nvidia