Corsair Memory, a leading supplier of high-end memory modules, has managed to set a new DDR3 memory clock-speed world record. The company used its Dominator GTX6 memory modules as well as AMD FX-8150 "Zambezi" microprocessor. Unfortunately, Corsair managed to set the record in single-channel mode, which makes it rather useless for the real world.
In a bid to reach 3467.8MHz (1733.8MHz), Corsair utilized Asus Crosshair V Formula mainboard as well as AMD FX-8150 microprocessor and Dominator GTX6 1GB DDR3 memory module cooled by liquid nitrogen. The chip operated at 4045.6MHz in single-module/dual-core mode and after numerous attempts its integrated memory controller managed to run Corsair's DDR3 memory in single-channel mode at 3.468GHz clock-speed, which is less than 10MHz higher than the previous record of 3.460GHz.

While it is remarkable that some of AMD FX-8150 "Zambezi" microprocessors may not only set records in internal clock-speeds, but also renew world's DDR3 frequency records with Corsair Dominator GTX 1GB modules, it should be kept in mind that the effect of such overclocking has little or no practical value.
"Breaking overclocking world records requires skill, ingenuity, and the right equipment. I have broken several records using Dominator GT memory. It is reliable, it has amazing headroom, and it's never let me down," said Jake Crimmins, a champion overclocker and an employee of Corsair.

AMD's FX microprocessors have dual-channel memory controller and therefore enthusiasts are trying to overclock memory in dual-channel mode. Memory bandwidth provided by single-channel memory at 3.468GHz is 27.74GB/s, whereas in dual-channel mode even 2.4GHz modules can achieve 38.4GB/s even without liquid nitrogen. In addition, 1GB of memory is not enough to run modern benchmarks, so the actual advantage of extreme memory speed cannot be measured.
Despite of little practical effect of extreme memory overclocking in single-channel mode, Corsair Memory regains DDR3 memory clock-speed crown from G.Skill.
Tags: Corsair, DDR3, DRAM, Dominator, AMD, Zambezi
Comments currently:
8
Discussion started: 11/23/11 02:00:08 PM
Latest comment: 11/29/11 03:40:20 PM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-5]
1.
looks like someone left the motherboard and ram in a non frost free freezer
1
0
[
Posted by: vid_ghost

|
Date: 11/23/11 02:00:08 PM]
2.
Meaningless achievement. And it does not change that FX is shit.
1
3
[
Posted by: visz963

|
Date: 11/23/11 11:28:17 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Yeah I have to agree.
0
0
[
Posted by: jmlxg

|
Date: 11/29/11 03:37:44 PM]
3.
Wow another Record, But Basically Worthless in Real World Application.
1
0
[
Posted by: xentar

|
Date: 11/24/11 03:39:36 AM]
4.
For those who enjoy pushing the limits, overclocking is fun. The FX-4100 is a pretty good OC'ing CPU and it's performance scales well with the OC.
As far as RAM is concerned, DDR3 RAM isn't really bottlenecking any desktop systems so if you run at 1600 MHz. or 2500 MHz. there is only a couple percent change in performance.
4 GB. of RAM seems to be plenty for gaming and 8 GB. plenty for most any 64 bit desktop PC unless you run very large CAD, video editing or similar apps.
0
1
[
Posted by: beenthere

|
Date: 11/24/11 04:05:29 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
You double posting proves you are a Foolish AMD Fanboi. Intel has won just give and go home AMD Fanboi. As I said before unless AMD Trinity uses 10 watts or less it is doomed.
0
0
[
Posted by: jmlxg

|
Date: 11/29/11 03:40:20 PM]
5.
For those who enjoy pushing the limits, overclocking is fun. The FX-4100 is a pretty good OC'ing CPU and it's performance scales well with the OC.
As far as RAM is concerned, DDR3 RAM isn't really bottlenecking any desktop systems so if you run at 1600 MHz. or 2500 MHz. there is only a couple percent change in performance.
4 GB. of RAM seems to be plenty for gaming and 8 GB. plenty for most any 64 bit desktop PC unless you run very large CAD, video editing or similar apps.
0
1
[
Posted by: beenthere

|
Date: 11/24/11 04:05:48 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Oh my YOU ARE A FOOL. Don't you get that CRAPDOZER has half the IPC and uses twice the power of Intel's Sandy Bridge. The FX-4100 SUCKS it is only as good as a Sandy Bridge dual core. I bet my Intel core i3-2100T could beat it at stock and be at least close when the FX4100 is overclocked. you Foolish AMD Fanboi.
0
0
[
Posted by: jmlxg

|
Date: 11/29/11 03:37:03 PM]
[1-5]