News

Intel Corporation introduced Tuesday a number of powerful Mobile Pentium 4 microprocessors designed for notebook computers that are used primarily as desktops. The announcement reflects Intel’s intention to transit all NetBurst-based chips to the 90nm fabrication process.

The Mobile Intel Pentium 4 Processors are designed for larger-sized notebook PCs, also known as “desktop replacements”, typically featuring large screens, full-size keyboards and multiple drives. Mobile Intel Pentium 4 processors 538, 532, and 518 are based on the Prescott architecture and feature 1MB L2 cache, SSE3 technology and the HyperThreading. The chips bring no clock-speed increases over predecessors, even though they are made using thinner 90nm process technology compared to predecessors, and are available in 3.20GHz (538), 3.06GHz (532) and 2.80GHz (518) speed-bins.

The new Mobile Pentium 4 processors feature power management Enhanced Intel SpeedStep technology that enables lower thermals than its desktop counterpart providing more reliable system performance in a notebook. Thermal design power (TDP) of the new “Prescott” Mobile Pentium 4 processors at the speeds of 2.80GHz, 3.06GHz and 3.20GHz is 88W. Intel also tells notebook makers that future direction of TDP is 94W, seriously more compared to 76W thermal design power of previous generation Mobile Pentium 4 chips produced using 130nm process technology.

The revamped Mobile Intel Pentium 4 processors made using 90nm fabrication process utilize 533MHz Quad Pumped Bus and are compatible with Intel 852GME and Intel 852PM chipsets.

Separately Intel unveiled Celeron M 340 (1.50GHz) processor with 512KB of L2 cache and 400MHz processor system bus for value mobile computers.

In 1000 unit quantities, the Mobile Intel Pentium 4 Processor 538, 532 and 518 are priced at $294, $234 and $202, respectively; the Intel Celeron M Processor 340 is priced at $134.

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 06/01/04 10:01:29 PM
Latest comment: 06/02/04 09:18:27 AM

[1-3]

1. 
wow,what a great way to suck down battery power.

seriously though, why would anyone consider a p4 for the laptop to begin with?

it's sucks battery life like there is no tomorrow and an athlon and a centrino does a lot better in power consumption, and in performance.
[Posted by: skeptical  | Date: 06/01/04 10:01:29 PM]

2. 
Burn, burn... why 90nm? Or some other company show that 90nm is ok, or this was a skip it tech, or is this all bad engineering?
[Posted by: I  | Date: 06/02/04 02:21:27 AM]

3. 
haha

A Prescott based Notebook! Your going to need oven gloves to use it!

srg
[Posted by: srg86  | Date: 06/02/04 09:18:27 AM]

[1-3]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Friday, July 3, 2009

5:50 pm | Apple Reminds: iPhone and iPod Overheat at 35 Degrees Celcius. Apple Issues Warning Concerning Overheating

1:09 pm | Former Intel’s Chief Does Not Expect Quick Results from Intel-Nokia Pact. Feasibility of Intel’s and Nokia’s Partnership to Be Clear in Several Years

9:15 am | Nvidia's Chief Executive Publicly Unveils Pricing of "Ion" Core-Logic. Nvidia’s Ion Platform Appears to Be Up to Three Times More Expensive than Intel’s

Thursday, July 2, 2009

11:42 pm | Transcend Equips Memory Modules with Thermal Sensors. Transcend's New Memory Modules Can Monitor Their Temperature

10:17 pm | AMD Will Not Support Nvidia's CUDA Technology. AMD Not Interested in Supporting Nvidia's CUDA

3:46 pm | Sony Claims that UMD-Less PlayStation Portable Was Always In The Plans. Sony's Claims Raises Question Whether UMD Ever Was a Compulsory Element of PSP

12:43 pm | DDR3 to Capture 30% of the Market by Year End - DRAMeXchange. Contract DDR3 Prices to Increase in July