News

Intel Corporation introduced Tuesday a number of powerful Mobile Pentium 4 microprocessors designed for notebook computers that are used primarily as desktops. The announcement reflects Intel’s intention to transit all NetBurst-based chips to the 90nm fabrication process.

The Mobile Intel Pentium 4 Processors are designed for larger-sized notebook PCs, also known as “desktop replacements”, typically featuring large screens, full-size keyboards and multiple drives. Mobile Intel Pentium 4 processors 538, 532, and 518 are based on the Prescott architecture and feature 1MB L2 cache, SSE3 technology and the HyperThreading. The chips bring no clock-speed increases over predecessors, even though they are made using thinner 90nm process technology compared to predecessors, and are available in 3.20GHz (538), 3.06GHz (532) and 2.80GHz (518) speed-bins.

The new Mobile Pentium 4 processors feature power management Enhanced Intel SpeedStep technology that enables lower thermals than its desktop counterpart providing more reliable system performance in a notebook. Thermal design power (TDP) of the new “Prescott” Mobile Pentium 4 processors at the speeds of 2.80GHz, 3.06GHz and 3.20GHz is 88W. Intel also tells notebook makers that future direction of TDP is 94W, seriously more compared to 76W thermal design power of previous generation Mobile Pentium 4 chips produced using 130nm process technology.

The revamped Mobile Intel Pentium 4 processors made using 90nm fabrication process utilize 533MHz Quad Pumped Bus and are compatible with Intel 852GME and Intel 852PM chipsets.

Separately Intel unveiled Celeron M 340 (1.50GHz) processor with 512KB of L2 cache and 400MHz processor system bus for value mobile computers.

In 1000 unit quantities, the Mobile Intel Pentium 4 Processor 538, 532 and 518 are priced at $294, $234 and $202, respectively; the Intel Celeron M Processor 340 is priced at $134.

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 06/01/04 10:01:29 PM
Latest comment: 06/02/04 09:18:27 AM

[1-3]

1. 
wow,what a great way to suck down battery power.

seriously though, why would anyone consider a p4 for the laptop to begin with?

it's sucks battery life like there is no tomorrow and an athlon and a centrino does a lot better in power consumption, and in performance.
[Posted by: skeptical  | Date: 06/01/04 10:01:29 PM]

2. 
Burn, burn... why 90nm? Or some other company show that 90nm is ok, or this was a skip it tech, or is this all bad engineering?
[Posted by: I  | Date: 06/02/04 02:21:27 AM]

3. 
haha

A Prescott based Notebook! Your going to need oven gloves to use it!

srg
[Posted by: srg86  | Date: 06/02/04 09:18:27 AM]

[1-3]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS