AMD Turion 64 model ML-40 microprocessors from Advanced Micro Devices are now sold in Tokyo, Japan, despite of not being launched officially. The chips are currently ranked as the fastest AMD Turion 64 offering.
AMD Turion 64 ML-40 processor operates at 2.20GHz and has built-in 1MB L2 cache as well as single-channel PC3200 memory controller. The ML-series of AMD Turion 64 products has thermal envelope of 35W. Additionally, the chip features PowerNow! energy saving technology with C3 Deeper Sleep state that reduces power consumption during idle moments as well as 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2 and SSE3 instructions. Like all AMD Athlon 64 processors, the Turion 64 supports 64-bit capability in addition to Enhanced Virus Protection technology.
Currently the Turion 64 ML-40 is the world’s highest performing processor for notebooks with 64-bit capability. So far AMD has not announced the model, though, the actual sales may mean that AMD is about to reveal the product officially.
Retailers in Tokyo, Japan, sell AMD Turion 64 ML-40 for $610 - $635, reports Akiba PC Hotline.
The chip sold today might be targeted at the upgrade market, but given that the Turion 64 was announced back in early March, there is hardly any installed base for it. It could make sense for Mobile AMD Athlon 64-based notebook owners to swap their processors for the Turion 64: the performance is likely to remain the same or even get higher with the ML-family of Turion 64, but the battery life could improve; still, the size of a notebook will remain the same – pretty large in the case of AMD Mobile Athlon 64. It is also unclear whether AMD Turion 64 is drop-in compatible with all AMD64-based notebooks.
AMD Turion 64 targets the same space as Intel’s Centrino mobile platform – thin, light, but yet powerful notebooks. However, there is a significant difference between the Turion and the Centrino: the Turion 64 is a standalone processor, whereas the Centrino is a platform. AMD Turion 64 may be paired with any validated system logic from companies like ATI Technologies, NVIDIA Corp., Silicon Integrated Systems, ULi Electronics or VIA Technologies and any wired or wireless network adapters preferred by notebook makers. In case of Intel Centrino notebook manufacturers have to choose Intel Pentium M chip, Intel’s core-logic and Intel’s network controllers to be able to use the Centrino brand-name.
AMD did not comment on the news-story.
Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 05/09/05 07:27:53 AM
Latest comment: 08/05/05 06:25:56 PM
Turion is a CPU.
Pentium-M is a CPU.
Centrino is a CPU/Chipset/Wireless in one package.
AMD doesn't have a direct equivalent.
Centrino as a platform has no competitor. AMD needs to address this issue, once it gains a good, tight grip on other markets. Overall, its gain about 17% of the chip market. (Intel has 82%, VIA and Transmeta has about 1%)...AMD will be more noticeable if they can grab half the market.
They've done quite well with the K8 design, the single-core variants are doing good, and the dual-core are basically mopping up Intel's "slapstick" Pentium-D/XE response without trying.
You also need to consider the business world...There's always the mentality that "no one ever got fired for choosing Intel". AMD has to break that thinking. They've got the performance and some features...What they need is to make more people aware of their products. You talk to the average Jane/Joe PC user, and all they know is Intel.
If AMD does come up with a "Centrino killer", and make the drivers completely open-source, you bet more alternative OSs will take it over Intel.
Intel does things its own way, and some in the open-source community don't like it.
For example, OpenBSD's "main man", Theo, has tried to encourage Intel to release the source for the wireless component for Centrino. Intel's management refuses (but unofficially, Intel's engineers want to help...Their hands are tied by Intel politics).
Linux may not be ready for the average desktop user, but its getting there. MS knows Linux is a threat to its profits.
Once Linux reaches to the same level of "ease of use" maturity as Windows (desktop distros only) and gain more support from software developers, you see more people would be tempted to download (free) and install (no product activation crap) these alternative OSs.
MS will continue support for WinXP for approx 10 yrs. It will continually update some features as found in the upcoming Longhorn. Once 10 yrs are up, you better upgrade or look for something else.
I've already started using Linux and BSD. I don't want to rely on Windows anymore (as much as possible).
My upcoming system upgrades (I have 5 PCs) will be a bit of both AMD and Intel dual-core. Although, I'm more in preference of AMD, as it delivers a better overall performance...Couple this with VMware, and I can install several OSs on one PC.
05/10/05 08:12:19 AM]
Add your Comment
Enter your username and e-mail address. Password will be sent to you.