News
 

Bookmark and Share

(2) 

The  U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has halted the patent infringement case filed by Rambus against Micron Technology. The stay order, issued by the Honorable Ronald M. Whyte, comes after an earlier decision by the U.S. District Court of Delaware that Rambus’ patents in that case were unenforceable against Micron.

“We are pleased that Judge Whyte recognized that the Delaware Court’s unenforceability ruling impacts the patents asserted by Rambus in the California matter, and that he stayed Rambus’ patent case against Micron. We believe that Judge Robinson’s thorough decision will be upheld on appeal,” said Rod Lewis, Micron’s vice president of legal affairs and general counsel.

Judge Whyte likewise stayed proceedings in parallel patent infringement cases filed by Rambus against Samsung Electronics, Nanya Technology Corp. and Hynix Semiconductor. Therefore, Rambus can still demand licensing fees from the aforementioned companies.

On January 9, the Honorable Sue L. Robinson of the U.S. District Court of Delaware held that because Rambus’ “spoliation conduct was extensive, including within its scope the destruction of innumerable documents relating to all aspects of Rambus’ business”, the only appropriate sanction for the conduct was “to declare the patents in suit unenforceable against Micron”.

In the opinion issued today, Judge Whyte acknowledged the impact of the Delaware Court’s decision and declared that the cases should be stayed indefinitely, pending appeals of the Delaware spoliation and unenforceability decision and a spoliation decision by Judge Whyte in an earlier case involving Rambus and Hynix.

“While we are disappointed with the stay of the coordinated cases, it is our expectation that the conflicting opinions of the district courts regarding document spoliation will go up together on appeal. We believe that our view will be vindicated,” said Tom Lavelle, senior vice president and general counsel at Rambus.

Tags: Micron, Samsung, Hynix, Rambus, Nanya

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 02/06/09 05:24:24 AM
Latest comment: 02/07/09 07:03:58 PM

[1-2]

1. 
It's just another example of justice mockery. And that us patent office d-tours their pathetic rules in case there are some higher bidders. Or we could say it's just a ripoff to Rambus and non us based companies.
0 0 [Posted by: OmegaHuman  | Date: 02/06/09 05:24:24 AM]
Reply

2. 
Hopefully this will be the beginning of the end for rambus and their litigious ways
0 0 [Posted by: alpha0ne  | Date: 02/07/09 07:03:58 PM]
Reply

[1-2]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones

Monday, July 21, 2014

10:32 pm | PQI Debuts Flash Drive with Lightning and USB Connectors. PQI Offers Easy Way to Boost iPhone or iPad Storage

10:08 pm | Japan Display Begins to Mass Produce IPS-NEO Displays. JDI Begins to Mass Produce Rival for AMOLED Panels

12:56 pm | Microsoft to Fire 18,000 Employees to Boost Efficiency. Microsoft to Perform Massive Job Cut Ever Following Acquisition of Nokia