News
 

Bookmark and Share

(3) 

Systems powered by AMD’s code-named Ontario and Zacate accelerated processing units (APUs) will cost starting from $349. The world’s second largest supplier of microprocessors for personal computers hopes to revolutionize the markets of low-cost netbooks and notebooks with its new chips thanks to high amount of advantages that they bring.

“We believe we should see notebooks [based on Ontario and Zacate] in around the $349 range,” said Godfrey Cheng, a director of client technology unit at AMD, in an interview with X-bit labs.

The Ontario and Zacate accelerated processing units belong to the Brazos platform that brings a number of features that so far have not been available at low price-points. According to AMD, the Brazos platform offers a significant amount of advantages compared to Intel Atom, the chip that powers the fast majority of notebooks. Among the most important advantages of Brazos AMD names better micro-architecture, DirectX 11 graphics engine as well as support for general-purpose computing on graphics processing unit.

“Brazos has excellently balanced performance on x86, graphics and parallel compute. If you look at typical Atom platform today, it basically has out-of-date in-order x86 core [as well as low-end graphics adapter]. We have out-of-order x86 core. We have DirectX 11 graphics engine with UVD 3.0 video decoder. We have GPGPU with DirectCompute and OpenCL support. Our 9W/18W solution provide performance and feature-set comparable to competitor's 35W solutions,” said Mr. Cheng.

AMD Brazos platform for desktops and mobile computers will consist of AMD Fusion accelerated processing unit (APU) code-named Ontario/Zacate as well as code-named Hudson D1 fusion controller hub, which will connect to processor using PCI Express 2.0 x4 bus and will support 4 PCIe x1 ports, PCI bus, 6 Serial ATA-300 ports, 14 USB 2.0 ports as well as integrated clock-generator. The part does not support RAID, Gigabit Ethernet and other capabilities, hence, Brazos platform will hardly be suitable for commercial systems without additional chips.

There will be four AMD APUs released initially:

  • E350 - two low-power Bobcat cores operating at 1.60GHz, Radeon HD 6310 graphics engine with 80 stream processors and universal video decoder 3.0 engine operating at 500MHz, 18W TDP;
  • E240 - one low-power Bobcat cores operating at 1.50GHz, Radeon HD 6310 graphics engine with 80 stream processors and universal video decoder 3.0 engine operating at 500MHz, 18W TDP;
  • C50 - two low-power Bobcat cores operating at 1.0GHz, Radeon HD 6250 graphics engine with 80 stream processors and universal video decoder 3.0 engine operating at 280MHz, 9W TDP;
  • C30 -one low-power Bobcat cores operating at 1.20GHz, Radeon HD 6250 graphics engine with 80 stream processors and universal video decoder 3.0 engine operating at 280MHz, 9W TDP;

Tags: AMD, zacate, Gigabyte, Fusion, Brazos, 40nm

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 12/13/10 09:08:03 AM
Latest comment: 12/15/10 07:33:02 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-2]

1. 
They should be able to make the E240 consume less than 15W ... I mean .. half the CPU cores and lower frequency but the same power consumption ?
0 0 [Posted by: East17  | Date: 12/13/10 09:08:03 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
You're not online with AMD marketing lately?

They need to deliver a product. And they wont bother themselves with same issues youre troubled

If you want UltraPortable chip you have C50 .. two cores and ULP GPU core


You know Bobcat itself is probably along w/ 2x512L2 sub 4W dual core OOO uP most of it's power goes to GPU and TDP is just something OEMs should consider in their builds not really designation how much power will it suck

They said average power consumption use will be around 30% TDP for those E350
0 0 [Posted by: OmegaHuman  | Date: 12/13/10 05:52:14 PM]
Reply

2. 
You need to remember that the TDP in this case do not means actual power consumption, just global numbers for each brand Ontario/Zacate .

E240 will consume less than the dual core. An Athlon II X4 / PII X4 / X6 rated at 95w don't consume the same. Even the X6 and it's six cores consume less than the PII X4 with the same TDP.
0 2 [Posted by: Nintendork  | Date: 12/15/10 07:33:02 PM]
Reply

[1-2]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Monday, July 28, 2014

6:02 pm | Microsoft’s Mobile Strategy Seem to Fail: Sales of Lumia and Surface Remain Low. Microsoft Still Cannot Make Windows a Popular Mobile Platform

12:11 pm | Intel Core i7-5960X “Haswell-E” De-Lidded: Twelve Cores and Alloy-Based Thermal Interface. Intel Core i7-5960X Uses “Haswell-EP” Die, Promises Good Overclocking Potential

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones