News
 

Bookmark and Share

(2) 

Asustek Computer, a leading maker of notebooks and various other computer components, believes that Google Android platform has all the chances to beat Apple on the market of tablets. But the success of the platform will be determined by the collective success of all supporters of Android, including hardware and software designers.

"We are pioneers in computers, [Apple] are pioneers with the slates. Our strength lies in the fact that we offer customers a choice. In many respects our devices are more functional; Asus will continue to develop in this direction. [...] The software from Apple is very good and it is hard for us to compete with them. They are ahead with the interface and the ecosystems. We are ahead with the hardware. I think Google has a chance to win with the support of Qualcomm, Nvidia and others in the future, for example, Intel. Apple has its own processor, and it is their weakness. If there is a chance for Google, then there is a chance for use," said Jerry Shen, chief executive officer of Asustek, in an interview with Hi-tech@mail.ru web-site.

The main weakness of Apple is definitely not its custom system-on-chips, such as A4 or A5, or other exclusive technology inside its tablets, notebooks and other devices. The main drawback of Apple is closed ecosystem that competes against numerous other companies that are larger than Apple and that are stronger than Apple. Combined, those companies can develop innovations that Apple simply cannot afford and therefore offer more compelling platforms. On the market of personal computers some 25 - 30 years ago Apple lost the battle because it competed against tens of other companies and even now its global market share - after the success of iPod, iPhone and iPad - is about 5%.

Among the other ambitious plans of Asustek Computer for this year are a tablet with auto-stereoscopic 3D screen, a slate with a quad-core microprocessor as well as netbook with MeeGo operating system.

"We plan to release a tablet with a 7" stereo-3D screen. Just like with our laptops, special glasses to see the three-dimensional effect will be needed. [...] Tablets are now based on dual-core processors, but they will get quad-core chips. [Many-core] chips are needed for video on the first place. In the future we expect to support Full-HD, or even higher and quad-core chips will not playback such video streams smoothly. We do understand that this is not needed by everyone, but many need high-definition video quality on TV. According to our estimates, there will be around 20% [users of tablets who need HD on slates]. Naturally, the increase of resolution can also be felt on the tablet itself," explained Mr. Shen.

In spite of uncertain market prospects, Asustek still has plans to launch a netbook featuring MeeGo operating system by Intel Corp. and other supporters.

"We are actively working with Intel and plan to introduce our first netbook with MeeGo [and Intel Atom processor] in April - June timeframe. Moreover, there will be another Intel Atom-based model with Android. Today, thanks to Windows, netbooks have become mini-laptops. Alternative OS narrow functionality and focus devices on the Internet, which is the original concept of the netbook class, " the CEO of Asus indicated.

Tags: ASUS, Eee, Apple, Android, MeeGo

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 03/09/11 10:55:28 AM
Latest comment: 03/22/11 06:52:56 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-1]

1. 
What a poorly informed article. This writer has no clue.

Apple didn't lose the computer war. They won against the companies around in the 70s, and they did it by remaining proprietary.

Who did they lose to? IBM is out of the PC business. Tandy? Same thing. Commodore? Dead. Atari? When's the last time you saw them make a computer? These were the big players back then, and only Apple remains. Even the first clone makers like Compaq had to be eaten by HP. IBM has gone back to selling proprietary hardware as well.

Apple is a huge company, and there are a lot of advantages to having complete control, and being proprietary. There are disadvantages too. It's not clear cut either way.
0 0 [Posted by: TA152H  | Date: 03/09/11 10:55:28 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Apple sells more Ipads than all Macs, desktop AND laptop. They are no longer a computer company, they are now a consumer electronics outfit, making popular, shiny, but overpriced and useless toys. IBM was never really in the business of making PCs - they are a consulting/engineering/research company first and foremost. Crapple lost the PC war to MSFT, precisely because MSFT let (or, rather, made everyone) use their OS, rather than making their own PCs.
0 0 [Posted by: man_bash  | Date: 03/22/11 06:52:56 PM]
Reply

[1-1]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Thursday, August 28, 2014

12:22 pm | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

9:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

6:41 pm | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture

Monday, August 25, 2014

6:05 pm | Chinese Inspur to Sell Mission-Critical Servers with AMD Software, Power 8 Processors. IBM to Enter Chinese Big Data Market with the Help from Inspur

Sunday, August 24, 2014

6:12 pm | Former X-Bit Labs Editor Aims to Wed Tabletop Games with Mobile Platforms. Game Master Wants to Become a New World of Warcraft