News
 

Bookmark and Share

(14) 

At its financial analyst day event on Thursday, Advanced Micro Devices disclosed peculiarities of its forthcoming platform for ultrathin laptops. The code-named Trinity accelerated processing unit in ball-grid array form-factor will let PC makers to create notebooks with premium quad-core CPU and high-quality graphics that are only 18mm thick and that cost just about $600.

At the FAD, AMD demonstrated a prototype of a laptop powered by a unique quad-core AMD quad-core A6 ULV "Trinity" accelerated processing unit (APU) with 17W thermal design power. The prototype was actually a reference design jointly developed by AMD and Compal and was a 13" wide-screen laptop just 18mm thick. Compal, a contract maker of electronics, may start producing notebooks using this design for interested parties, whereas other notebook makers may create their own ultra-thin mobile computers powered by AMD Trinity.

"The 18mm reference design from Compal is what many OEMs are looking at. We believe that this will bring the ultra-thin form-factor into $600 - $800 price-point. This is [an evidence of] the value of APUs because you really have performance that you need at the power envelope that you need at the right price-point," said Lisa Su, general manager of global business units at AMD.

The 18mm thickness for a reference design of an inexpensive laptop is a remarkable achievement. For comparison: Apple Macbook Air is up to 17mm thick, Lenovo ThinkPad X1 is up to 21.5mm thick and the world's thinnest notebook - Samsung Series 9 900X3B - is 12.9mm thick. Unfortunately, AMD's reference design is made of plastic, whereas typical ultra-thin mobile PCs are made of metal. It is likely that AMD specifically recommends its partners to use inexpensive materials to ensure low price of its ultra-thin notebooks, but that will clearly affect quality.

AMD attempts to offer better pricing on Trinity-powered ultra-thin machines in order to successful compete against Intel Corp.'s ultrabook initiative. AMD-based ultrathin notebooks are projected to be at least $200 cheaper than machines powered by Intel Core i 3000-series “Ivy Bridge” microprocessors. Lower price is supposed to compensate lower x86 performance of AMD’s Trinity compared to Intel’s Ivy Bridge. At the same time, AMD-based ultrathin machines will offer faster and more capable graphics engine. Moreover, based on AMD promises, it will offer 17W quad-core microprocessors, which should provide decent responsibility.

At present it is unknown when the laptops with AMD A6 ULV "Trinity" processor with 17W TDP will become available.

Tags: AMD, Trinity, Southern Islands, Radeon, Fusion, Ultrabook

Discussion

Comments currently: 14
Discussion started: 02/03/12 06:48:34 AM
Latest comment: 03/09/12 10:21:20 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-6]

1. 
Trinity looks like a great APU and certain to surpass Ivy Bridge laptops.

http://www.fudzilla.com/h...ts-sandy-bridge-in-3dmark

http://semiaccurate.com/2...-in-the-ultrabook-market/
3 3 [Posted by: beenthere  | Date: 02/03/12 06:48:34 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
I would have to agree with you.
1 3 [Posted by: jmlxg  | Date: 02/03/12 07:34:47 AM]
Reply

2. 
Sony VAIO Y-Series E-450 netbook has the AMD Radeon HD 6320 GPU built-in and is actually quite
fast for the platform and overall cost. http://www.epinions.com/content_577205407364

Trinity seems to be a mid-generation release that improves on the previous Llano but keeps the same restricted cache size.

All that said, I am also very eager to get my hands on the new Kaveri and Kabini APU!
2 0 [Posted by: rgathright  | Date: 02/03/12 09:10:33 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
I can't wait to see AMD's 2013 APU's because power consumption will go down even more in 2013.
0 1 [Posted by: jmlxg  | Date: 02/06/12 08:38:50 PM]
Reply

3. 
I think I will get something this year and wait until 2014 when 14nm for Intel and 14nm FDSOI for AMD not to mention DDR4.
1 1 [Posted by: jmlxg  | Date: 02/03/12 11:34:32 AM]
Reply

4. 
Only grandmas use intel base ultrathin. they may look classy but surely they are dumb. Never in the near future will intel can compete on AMD's fusion APUs, Intel graphics are the worst in the industry. It can comfortably run solitaire which is grandma's favorite game.
2 0 [Posted by: xybit  | Date: 02/04/12 10:26:04 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Intel HD graphics can do lot more than run solitaire. Apple and AMD are two of the many reasons Intel has to improve their IGP.
0 1 [Posted by: jmlxg  | Date: 02/04/12 10:36:51 PM]
Reply
 
yes AMD is,
if AMD hadn't made the fusion APUs then intel would've found no reason to improve their processors

but why is apple forcing intel to improve HD graphics?
0 0 [Posted by: madooo12  | Date: 02/05/12 02:38:37 AM]
Reply
 
I wish I can agree, but intel has ~100K employees and is trying to make the best graphics

with intels money and workforce, I think it can make some good graphics in the near future

I still wish the opposite though
0 0 [Posted by: madooo12  | Date: 02/05/12 02:32:22 AM]
Reply
 
They have had more then 6 years to "make better graphics" .. they even "almost" released a add in card product a few years ago that was a complete flop and was canned.... the Number 1 reason Intels graphics are so bad is in the compatability and drivers with "games" ... AMD and Nvidia have been around for so long they both improve the software side of graphics cards along with hardware to make games run the best they can... unlike untel who only release hardware and the software is next to worthless... 100k employees with about 1 or 2 of them working on the graphics drivers LOL haha

Intel IS improving but at a much slower pase then AMD or Nvidia and thats the problem!.

For every step forward intel makes in graphics AMD and Nvidia take half a step more!
0 0 [Posted by: vid_ghost  | Date: 02/05/12 02:16:44 PM]
Reply

5. 
I'd pay 900-1000$ for an AMD aluminium ultrathin. It would rock my world.
1 1 [Posted by: Jermelescu  | Date: 02/06/12 10:38:02 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
I would not pay that much for an ultrathin. Besides AMD WILL NOT have an 11.6 inch model and that is a DEAL KILLER for me.
0 1 [Posted by: jmlxg  | Date: 02/06/12 08:37:06 PM]
Reply
 
Honestly, I'd love a 13" aluminium ultrathin, like a <10 mm one. It would rock my world.
0 0 [Posted by: Jermelescu  | Date: 03/09/12 10:21:20 AM]
Reply

6. 
Since AMD doesn't actually make the laptops I think we'll need to wait and see what the OEMs offer. I suspect most of the ultrthins will be in the $400-$600 range. A shiny one may be $100 more???? I'd also like a 11"-13" Trinity powered laptop so someone had better be listening.

Today price drops on Ultrabooks were hinted at because they are not selling well and Trinity is about to show. AMD powered untrathins should still be several hundred cheaper and far better than Ivy Bridge.

http://www.fudzilla.com/h...ook-price-cuts-on-the-way
0 1 [Posted by: beenthere  | Date: 02/07/12 08:07:35 AM]
Reply

[1-6]

Add your Comment

[Login] [Forgot password?] [Registration]




Related news

Latest News

Thursday, May 24, 2012

11:25 pm | Nvidia's Affordable 4G/LTE Modem Certified by AT&T. Nvidia's Icera 410 4G/LTE Modem May Power Affordable Devices

10:00 pm | Microsoft Clarifies Its Exec's Claims: 500 Million Windows 8 Copies in 2013 Are "Potential" Upgrades. Microsoft Retracts Statement Regarding 500 Million Windows 8 Licenses to Be Sold in 2013

8:35 pm | ECS Reveals "NonStop" Mainboard Family with Extended Stability and Reliability. ECS Boosts Stability and Reliability with Premium Components and Rigorous Testing on NonStop Platforms

6:28 pm | AMD Rumoured to Start Production of Next-Gen FX-Chips in Q3. AMD to Start Making FX "Vishera" Chips Next Quarter

11:32 am | UMC Begins to Build Fab to Make 28nm, 20nm and 14nm Chips. UMC Spends $8 Billion on Expansion, Confirms Development of 14nm FinFET Process Technology