News
 

Bookmark and Share

(1) 

Apple and HTC did not announce any terms of their settlement, but analysts believe that the former will get from $6 to $8 in licensing fee from every handset sold by the latter. While for a typical company that would mean a substantial improvement for earnings, for Apple that will be immaterial, given its financial situation.

“Financial terms were not disclosed but we believe Apple is likely getting a net licensing fee due to its much stronger patent portfolio and we think position as undisputed inventor of the modern smart phone with touchscreen,” said Shaw Wu, an analyst with Sterne Agee, in a note to clients, reports Forbes.

The analyst estimates that Apple will get between $6 and $8 per HTC smartphone based on Google Android operating system sold in royalty fees, which will generate an additional $180 million to $200 million annual revenue for Apple. It is interesting to note that HTC already pays $5 per Android smartphone to Microsoft Corp.

“For a lot of companies, $180-280 million in annual licensing revenue from one vendor is material but for AAPL it will likely be immaterial to its financials given its large revenue base of $193 billion and $48 billion in net income that the investment community is forecasting for FY 2013,” wrote Mr. Wu.

The analyst hopes that after Apple settled with HTC, other makers of Google Android-based smartphones, particularly Samsung, will also agree to pay for Apple patents allegedly infringed by their products.

“We view this as a positive and the big question is whether Samsung and Motorola will also reach settlement agreements,” noted Mr. Wu.

 

Tags: Apple, iOS, HTC, Android, Business, Motorola, Samsung

Discussion

Comments currently: 1
Discussion started: 11/15/12 03:28:43 AM
Latest comment: 11/15/12 03:28:43 AM

[1-1]

1. 
LOL. HTC guys must rip us off so nastily when they can afford this. And shouldn't they publicly announce points why this agreement is made this way? Or is this just some rotten apple racketeering some bad guy from different town and now they agreed to put him under its protection. Arent both companies us based. Shouldt this be under RICO act or something? And if one company isnt us based then feds doesnt even bother when their home guys do it abroad?
0 0 [Posted by: OmegaHuman  | Date: 11/15/12 03:28:43 AM]
Reply

[1-1]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Monday, April 14, 2014

8:23 am | Microsoft Vows to Release Xbox 360 Emulator for Xbox One. Microsoft Xbox One May Gain Compatibility with Xbox 360 Games

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

10:39 am | Microsoft Reveals Kinect for Windows v2 Hardware. Launch of New Kinect for Windows Approaches

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

1:57 pm | Facebook to Acquire Virtual Reality Pioneer, Oculus VR. Facebook Considers Virtual Reality as Next-Gen Social Platform

1:35 pm | Intel Acquires Maker of Wearable Computing Devices. Basis Science Becomes Fully-Owned Subsidiary of Intel

Monday, March 24, 2014

10:53 pm | Global UHD TV Shipments Total 1.6 Million Units in 2013 – Analysts. China Ahead of the Whole World with 4K TV Adoption

10:40 pm | Crytek to Adopt AMD Mantle Mantle API for CryEngine. Leading Game Developer Adopts AMD Mantle

9:08 pm | Microsoft Unleashes DirectX 12: One API for PCs, Mobile Gadgets and Xbox One. Microsoft Promises Increased Performance, New Features with DirectX 12

3:33 pm | PowerVR Wizard: Imagination Reveals World’s First Ray-Tracing GPU IP for Mobile Devices. Imagination Technologies Brings Ray-Tracing, Hybrid Rendering Modes to Smartphones and Tablets

2:00 pm | Nokia Now Expects to Close Deal with Microsoft in Q2. Sale of Nokia’s Division to Close Next Month