News
 

Bookmark and Share

(1) 

Apple and HTC did not announce any terms of their settlement, but analysts believe that the former will get from $6 to $8 in licensing fee from every handset sold by the latter. While for a typical company that would mean a substantial improvement for earnings, for Apple that will be immaterial, given its financial situation.

“Financial terms were not disclosed but we believe Apple is likely getting a net licensing fee due to its much stronger patent portfolio and we think position as undisputed inventor of the modern smart phone with touchscreen,” said Shaw Wu, an analyst with Sterne Agee, in a note to clients, reports Forbes.

The analyst estimates that Apple will get between $6 and $8 per HTC smartphone based on Google Android operating system sold in royalty fees, which will generate an additional $180 million to $200 million annual revenue for Apple. It is interesting to note that HTC already pays $5 per Android smartphone to Microsoft Corp.

“For a lot of companies, $180-280 million in annual licensing revenue from one vendor is material but for AAPL it will likely be immaterial to its financials given its large revenue base of $193 billion and $48 billion in net income that the investment community is forecasting for FY 2013,” wrote Mr. Wu.

The analyst hopes that after Apple settled with HTC, other makers of Google Android-based smartphones, particularly Samsung, will also agree to pay for Apple patents allegedly infringed by their products.

“We view this as a positive and the big question is whether Samsung and Motorola will also reach settlement agreements,” noted Mr. Wu.

 

Tags: Apple, iOS, HTC, Android, Business, Motorola, Samsung

Discussion

Comments currently: 1
Discussion started: 11/15/12 03:28:43 AM
Latest comment: 11/15/12 03:28:43 AM

[1-1]

1. 
LOL. HTC guys must rip us off so nastily when they can afford this. And shouldn't they publicly announce points why this agreement is made this way? Or is this just some rotten apple racketeering some bad guy from different town and now they agreed to put him under its protection. Arent both companies us based. Shouldt this be under RICO act or something? And if one company isnt us based then feds doesnt even bother when their home guys do it abroad?
0 0 [Posted by: OmegaHuman  | Date: 11/15/12 03:28:43 AM]
Reply

[1-1]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Thursday, November 6, 2014

6:48 am | LG’s Unique Ultra-Wide Curved 34” Display Finally Hits the Market. LG 34UC97 Available in the U.S. and the U.K.

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

8:52 pm | Lisa Su Appointed as New CEO of Advanced Micro Devices. Rory Read Steps Down, Lisa Su Becomes New CEO of AMD

Thursday, August 28, 2014

12:22 pm | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

9:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

6:41 pm | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture