News
 

Bookmark and Share

(5) 

The latest low-power/low-cost micro-architecture from Intel Corp. has finally made application processors for ultra-portable devices from the company comparable to ARM architecture-based offerings in terms of power consumption. It looks like the world’s largest chipmaker does not want to stop there and plans to offer system-on-chips which price will also be comparable to ARM-powered SoCs.

After many years of trying, Intel has finally introduced system-on-chips based on Silvermont micro-architecture that could fit into media tablets thanks to scenario design power (SDP) of around 2W. A number of hardware manufacturers have already announced their slates based on Atom “Bay Trail-T” Z3000-series processors, whereas the other will do so by the holiday season. Despite of low consumption of energy, the new Atom chips offer high performance in both general-purpose and graphics applications, compatibility with x86 programs and some other advantages. One drawback that Intel’s latest tablet-oriented SoCs have is price. Being sold for $32 - $37, Intel Atom “Bay Trail-T” Z3000-series just cannot compete head-to-head against ARM-based chips that cost $15 - $25 - $30, even when Intel provides 10% discount to large customers.

In a bid to finally compete against popular ARM-based application processors from companies like MediaTek or Qualcomm, the world’s largest chipmaker intends to introduce Atom “Bay Trail-T” models priced in the range between $15 and $20, according to a report by DigiTimes web-site. The entry-level chips may not perform like their more expensive brethren, but their capabilities should be enough to compete against low-cost SoCs featuring ARM cores.


Lenovo IdeaPad Miix2 media tablet based on Intel Atom Z3000-series "Bay Trail-T" processor and Microsoft Windows 8.1 operating system.

Keeping in mind the fact that Nvidia Corp. traditionally prices its high-end Tegra application processors at around $30, it will be interesting to see the number of Tegra 4 design wins and compare it to Intel’s Atom Z3000-series’ design wins.

While Intel did not confirm existence of plans to release low-cost Atom “Bay Trail-T” Z3000-family system-on-chips, the company did say that it is interested in being flexible in terms of pricing. Given the fact that the chips are made using 22nm and are cheaper to produce than ARM-powered SoCs at 28nm node, Intel may have an opportunity to lower its pricing.

“As for Bay Trail pricing, we have not announced new pricing or parts. That said, in response to market demand, we are absolutely looking at getting Bay Trail into lower SPPs for tablets. We talked about this at IDF and a bit at Computex, too. It entails working very closely with OEM and ODM partners. When we have more to share here, we will definitely let you know,” said Kari Aakre, a spokeswoman for Intel, in an email.

Tags: Business, Intel, Atom, Bay Trail, Silvermont, 22nm, ARM, Cortex, Nvidia, Tegra, Qualcomm, Snapdragon, Mediatek

Discussion

Comments currently: 5
Discussion started: 10/19/13 08:31:48 AM
Latest comment: 06/23/14 03:10:24 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-3]

1. 
They can make all the x86 chips they like but until they acknowledge that the customer wants an Android type of O/S and Intel is stuck with Window from M/S nothing they do is going to compete with Arm in the mobile market.
1 1 [Posted by: tedstoy  | Date: 10/19/13 08:31:48 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Yep, MS as a major Intel partner has screwed up and can no longer be depended upon to deliver for the industry. Here comes GNU/ Linux. There is a serious opening available for the next big software company for general computing using Linux base. I don't think it will be Ubuntu though. RedHat is more of a chance. But it could be another company currently based in someone's garage.
0 2 [Posted by: linuxlowdown  | Date: 10/19/13 10:47:21 AM]
Reply
 
Uhh.. Android runs on these chips..
1 0 [Posted by: Tim Schultz  | Date: 10/19/13 09:31:45 PM]
Reply

2. 
I want both Windows 8 and Android on Bay Trail Transformer type setup for flexibility, preferably at 12".
0 0 [Posted by: Joel Kleppinger  | Date: 10/19/13 03:07:45 PM]
Reply

3. 
Android is for those people who just play stupid games.
Windows is great and available on both ARM and x86_x64.
Also these bay trail chips are a real competitor for ARM because of their price.
0 0 [Posted by: prc71  | Date: 06/23/14 03:10:24 AM]
Reply

[1-3]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones

Monday, July 21, 2014

10:32 pm | PQI Debuts Flash Drive with Lightning and USB Connectors. PQI Offers Easy Way to Boost iPhone or iPad Storage

10:08 pm | Japan Display Begins to Mass Produce IPS-NEO Displays. JDI Begins to Mass Produce Rival for AMOLED Panels

12:56 pm | Microsoft to Fire 18,000 Employees to Boost Efficiency. Microsoft to Perform Massive Job Cut Ever Following Acquisition of Nokia