Intel Speeds Up Pentium 4 “C-Class” Processors.

2.40, 2.66, 2.80 and 3.06GHz Available Now

by Anton Shilov
05/21/2003 | 06:55 AM

Asian web-sources report that Intel Corporation recently began to supply its notebook partners the faster Pentium 4 processors with reduced power-consumption. The chips do not feature any power-saving technologies, but boast with higher clock-speeds and 533MHz Quad Pumped Bus.

 

The hybrid microprocessors that consume about 40-45W of energy first emerged in middle-2002. Intel’s partners said that those processors are intended for desktop-replacement mobile personal computers and consume 15-20W less energy compared to ordinary desktop CPUs. In order to distinguish between mobile, desktop and desktop-replacement microprocessors, Intel call these chips as Intel Pentium 4C, whereas processors for notebooks are branded as Intel Pentium 4-M.

The Pentium 4C CPUs are available now at speeds of 2.40, 2.66, 2.80 and 3.06GHz. They all utilise 533MHz Quad Pumped Bus, however, do not sport the Hyper-Threading technology, like the Pentium 4 chips for desktops announced today. 

AMD Athlon XP-M DTR, Intel Pentium 4C* and Intel Pentium 4 Current Pricing

AMD CPU Model

Price

Intel C-class Model

Price

Intel CPU Model

Price

-

-

Pentium 4C 3.06GHz

$417

Pentium 4 3.06GHz

$401

-

-

-

-

Pentium 4 3.00GHz

$417

-

-

Pentium 4C 2.80GHz

$278

Pentium 4 2.80GHz

$262

-

-

Pentium 4C 2.80GHz

$218

Pentium 4 2.66GHz

$193

Athlon XP-M 2600+

$156

-

 

Pentium 4 2.60GHz

$193

 

 

-

-

Pentium 4 2.50/2.53GHz

$193

Athlon XP-M  2400+

$108

Pentium 4C 2.80GHz

$186

Pentium 4 2.40GHz

$163

Athlon XP-M  2200+

$86

-

-

-

-

Athlon XP-M  2000+

$71

-

-

-

-

Athlon XP-M 1900+

$69

-

-

-

-

Athlon XP-M  1800+

$59

-

-

-

-

Athlon XP-M  1700+

$55

-

-

-

-

*Market estimate

Being less advanced than mobile Pentium 4-M processors in terms of power consumption, these CPUs offer performance similar to desktop Intel Pentium 4 chips and are priced a bit higher than the latter, but lower compared to the former. Note that Intel does not include the prices of these chip in its official price-list over here.