Bookmark and Share


As 5” full-high-definition smartphone panels continue to gain traction and demand increases, manufacturers are beginning to implement new technologies to reduce power consumption at higher resolutions. More than 100 million 5” FHD smartphone panels will be shipped in 2013, 5% of all smartphone displays.

There are several manufacturing technologies that can produce the active matrix TFT backplane for 5” FHD (1920*1080) smartphone panels: traditional a-Si TFT, oxide TFT, and low temperature polysilicon (LTPS) TFT, all of which are used with LCD. LTPS TFT can also be used as a backplane for AMOLED (active matrix OLED) displays.

“While Apple iPhone suppliers are focused on the production of LTPS LCDs, others with experience in oxide TFT are trying to address the issue and gain a competitive advantage. Each of these technologies has its own advantages and disadvantages, and it will be critical for panel makers to choose the appropriate technology to reach their goals,” said Yoonsung Chung, director of large-area displays and FPD materials for NPD DisplaySearch.

The vast majority of smartphone LCD screens are now produced with a-Si TFT displays, due to its maturity and relatively low cost, despite the fact that it has lower performance than oxide or LTPS TFT. According to the latest NPD DisplaySearch Quarterly Smartphone and Tablet PC TFT LCD Cost Report, the manufacturing cost gap between a-Si and oxide screens is approximately 3 percent, and another 11 percent between oxide and LTPS TFT. As display performance continues to increase, however, the need for higher performance backplanes has grown, especially for high-resolution smartphone displays.

“Oxide TFT offers the potential to both lower cost and increase performance. The cost of oxide displays is comparable to a-Si displays, while the performance of oxide is closer to LTPS. However, instability, poor yield rate, and other technology hurdles could slow its adoption,” added Mr. Chung.

Tags: LCD, TFT, AMOLED, Samsung, LG Display, Apple, Sharp


Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 11/01/13 09:48:20 AM
Latest comment: 11/03/13 10:46:25 PM


No need to go beyond 720p on phones. It is larger screens that need resolution upgrades.

720p is good up to 8" phones/tablets
1080p is good up to 17" tablets/monitors
1440p is good up to 24" monitors...
(Absence of subpixel anti-aliasing will alter these a bit.)
0 2 [Posted by: CSMR  | Date: 11/01/13 09:48:20 AM]

I don't think there is any reason to increase resolution beyond 1080P for mobile phones. Currently a phone has 440PPI on a 5" screen, meaning that even an 8K monitor/tv on 32" have a lot less PPI than those screens.
Personally I believe that anything more than 300PPI is useless since the eye cannot see above that.
0 0 [Posted by: TAViX  | Date: 11/02/13 07:55:37 AM]

720P @ 4.6 inch results in a 319ppi which is the maximum size and resolution for a phone, anything bigger is really inconvenient and should be call as Tablet.
0 0 [Posted by: tks  | Date: 11/03/13 10:46:25 PM]


Add your Comment

Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

6:11 am | Apple Teams Up with IBM to Make iPhone and iPad Ultimate Tools for Businesses and Enterprises. IBM to Sell Business-Optimized iPhone and iPad Devices

Monday, July 14, 2014

6:01 am | IBM to Invest $3 Billion In Research of Next-Gen Chips, Process Technologies. IBM to Fund Development of 7nm and Below Process Technologies, Help to Create Post-Silicon Future

5:58 am | Intel Postpones Launch of High-End “Broadwell-K” Processors to July – September, 2015. High-End Core i “Broadwell” Processors Scheduled to Arrive in Q3 2015

5:50 am | Intel Delays Introduction of Core M “Broadwell” Processors Further. Low-Power Broadwell Chips Due in Late 2014

Wednesday, July 9, 2014

4:04 pm | Intel Readies New Quark “Dublin Bay” Microprocessors. Intel’s “Dublin Bay” Chips Due in 2015