News

On August 6, 1996, 3dfx Interactive began to sell its Voodoo Graphics the world’s first 3D graphics accelerator for computer games , igniting a new era for video gaming and establishing a new type of hardware for personal computers. On May 9, 2006, Ageia Technologies begins to ship its physics accelerators, something, which the company believes will have a similar impact on computer industry.

Ageia Technologies, the developer of the world’s first physics accelerator for games, said Tuesday that Asustek Computer and BFG Technologies had initiated shipments of add-in-cards featuring PhysX processors. The company said leading retail and online stores already can ship the appropriate accelerators to end users, who demand to pay about $299 for a card which benefits can be observed in only one game to date – Ubisoft’s Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter. But the company demonstrated eight more games that will take advantage of its PhysX processors at the E3 exhibition in Los Angeles, California. By contrast, several months before the release of the Voodoo Graphics, 3dfx Interactive could show 14 games taking advantage of the original Voodoo.

“With AgeiaPhysX accelerator cards now available to consumers from gaming hardware leaders Asus and BFG, we welcome gamers around the world to real-time physics gameplay that brings a new level or realism to gaming,” said Manju Hegde, chief executive at Ageia.

Ageia’s PhysX is the world’s first physics processing unit (PPU), which offloads software physics processing from central processing units and graphics processing units to it. The architecture of the PhysX PPU is tailored for multi-threaded processing of vertexes, which allows game creators to develop detailed, soft and precise animation and simulation of movements, hair, clothing, liquids, fluids and other. Currently Ageia’s PhysX is the world’s first and only dedicated physics processing unit, but the company expects more startups to offer similar technology.

Currently Asustek Computer and BFG Technologies offer PhysX add-in cards with 128MB 733MHz GDDR3 memory designed for PCI bus. Add-in cards are claimed to be available at leading retail and online stores around the world. BFG’s PhysX accelerator costs $299, whereas Asustek supplies two flavours of its board: one without any valuable bundle, whereas another with Ubisoft’s Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter game.

However, to take advantage of advanced capabilities the PhysX has, game developers have to create games using Novodex SDK supplied by Ageia, which requires some additional effort from them. According to Ageia, more than one hundred games designed for and supporting the Ageia PhysX processor are in development from over 60 software creators and publishers. The company does not provide any guidance regarding availability of PhysX-supporting titles, but says several titles that will support Ageia’s PPUs, including Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends, Bet on Soldier: Blood Sport, CellFactor, City of Villains and Gunship Apocalypse, will be available this spring.

“The use of physics in games adds another dimension to gameplay, making the experience much greater than ever before,” said Jon Peddie, principal analyst for JPR Research and a man who predicted bright future for 3dfx Interactive a decade ago. “With the release of its PhysX Processor AGEIA is blazing a trail that will benefit you, me and every other game player for years to come.”

Discussion

Comments currently: 15
Discussion started: 05/09/06 03:39:49 PM
Latest comment: 06/05/06 04:21:43 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-9]

1. 
Nope, I'll never buy it. If it was anything other than PCI, then maybe. I will never buy another card made for the old PCI bus. The industry has moved on, and it's time everyone else did.
[Posted by: Puh-Leeez  | Date: 05/09/06 03:39:49 PM]

2. 
i agree i will not buy it.$299 it is too expansive the price should below then $10 then i will think to buy IF it can gain 50% computer performance
[Posted by: Zymath  | Date: 05/09/06 06:54:56 PM]

3. 
I agree with the above partly.. i think this will type of card will do something for improving games in the long run.. but with only 1 game finished, i believe they are too early to start selling the cards.

Its strange that they didnt wait to have like 4-5 games shipping with the box and have it pci-express.
[Posted by: Silver  | Date: 05/10/06 02:48:37 AM]

4. 
I feel like a clown from a consumer perspective. We have multiple core processors now and still need another advanced math device??? We already have too much expense to build PCs that reach the quality levels of late gen consoles. To hell with Ageia. It even cost's more than a 7900 GT... and just to allow better debris and clothes, give me a break dudes... this is bullshit...
[Posted by: fullgrip  | Date: 05/10/06 06:21:23 AM]

5. 
This card is a good concept but.... it is a bunch of fucking garbage! The only thing it would be usefull for is like 3D rendering and calculation for profesionals, if the drivers would allow that.......
[Posted by: 2.71828  | Date: 05/10/06 07:34:49 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

6. 
Hmm. city of heroes supports the Ageia
[Posted by: Mike  | Date: 05/10/06 12:37:01 PM]

7. 
It's really odd that a lot of people seem to be personally threatened by this card. I don't see how this new technology is much different than the hardware T&L of the original Geforce, and yet people are like "NEW TECHNOLOGY?!?! BUT THAT ALTERS MY PERCEPTIONS ON THE WORLD AND MAKES IT SO THAT THE NVIDIA VS ATI WAR ISN'T AS IMPORTANT!!! NEVER!! I WON'T ACCEPT IT!!!"

I'll agree that it is a bit pricey, and they should have released a PCI-E variant (I remember hearing when it was originally announced that it was going to be PCI-E x4 only, and then the PCI model was added later... what happened to the x4?), but I am ALWAYS looking forward to new technology. Plus, I don't think that Physics processors are just going to go away... as much as ATI and Nvidia might want them to.
[Posted by: Psimitry  | Date: 05/11/06 09:05:30 AM]
+ expand thread (5 answers)

8. 
For the price, you would be better off purchasing a better/faster processor so that you could have an improved overall experience versus "neat explosions". On a side note wouldn't a dual or quad core be much better for game applications instead of an expensive FPGA or whatever the PPU is?
[Posted by: Not for me.  | Date: 05/11/06 12:43:08 PM]

9. 
i think that the new physics displayed in this ppu shud be something to get excited about.. i personall am going to hav a wank ova the new ppu.. u moan about the ppu's price well the quad core is as expensive. u just have to be patient in 2 yrs most games will be runnin with this so i think its a gud investmant to make now ..
[Posted by: liam garwood  | Date: 06/05/06 04:20:37 AM]

[1-9]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS