News
 

Bookmark and Share

(17) 

ATI Technologies, a leading graphics chip company, has unveiled another addition to its multi graphics chip CrossFire technology for consumers. The company proposes to use the third graphics processing unit (GPU) for physics calculations and claims that even its mainstream GPUs deliver better raw performance when compared to dedicated physics processing units (PPUs) from Ageia.

“The addition of physics to the CrossFire platform, and the continuing evolution of CrossFire is based directly on the feedback of hardcore gamers - CrossFire is not ATI's platform, it's gamers' platform,” said Godfrey Cheng, director of marketing, platform technologies, ATI Technologies, responsible for ATI's CrossFire strategy.

The GPU company plans to install not two, but three PCI Express slots for graphics card onto a single mainboard and assign the third graphics processor for physics. Or just two use the second graphics card for effects physics processing in games that use Havok FX physics engine, which is especially designed to calculate physics on shader model 3.0-compliant graphics processors. ATI’s approach allows so-called asymmetric implementation: graphics card for processing physics may be totally different from the GPU processing graphics, e.g., Radeon X1600 XT for physics and Radeon X1900 XTX for graphics.

According to ATI’s internal benchmarks, Ageia PhysX PPU (366MHz) can perform about half a million sphere-to-sphere collisions per second, whereas the Radeon X1600 XT (590MHz, 12 pixel shader processors) delivers over a million, meanwhile performance of Radeon X1900 XTX (650MHz, 48 pixel shader processors) reaches five million sphere-to-sphere collisions per second. While the synthetic benchmark numbers impress, game developers yet have to implement support for the Havok FX engine to take advantage of the theoretical power.

The Havok FX product is currently in early release to select developers and is expected to be available this summer.

Havok FX supports a new type of rigid-body object called a Debris Primitive. A Debris Primitive is a compact representation of a 3D collideable object that can be processed via Shader Model 3.0 (SM3.0) in a very efficient manner. Debris Primitives can be pre-modeled as part of a game’s static art content (e.g. custom/textured boulders, space junk, or collateral objects waiting for an explosive charge). Debris Primitives may also be generated on the fly during game play by the CPU, based on the direction and intensity of a force (e.g. brick and stone structure blown apart by a cannon blast). Once generated by the CPU, Debris Primitives can be dispatched fully to the GPU for physical simulation and final rendering – comprising a powerful blending of physics and state-of-the-art shading effects for particulate and large scale phenomenon.

Havok FX Debris Primitives can even interact with game-play critical objects, through an innovative approach that will provide the GPU with a one-way transfer of critical information that will allow Debris Primitives to respond to game play objects and large-scale world definitions. Havok FX Debris Primitives may be simulated in either OpenGL or DirectX. Havok will provide programming samples that illustrate interaction of Havok FX effects physics with Havok Complete game-play physics, to ensure that Physics Effects based on Havok FX deliver an immersive experience.

Discussion

Comments currently: 17
Discussion started: 06/07/06 12:32:11 PM
Latest comment: 12/29/07 12:56:20 PM

[1-2]

1. 
dark cloud foaming over ageia camp even before party is starting to get hot.

ATI has marketing power as well as wide research team. it seems logical that ATI or nVidia swallow ageia in the future.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 06/07/06 12:32:11 PM]
Reply

2. 
all in all it is going to cost more and more to play video games before you know it people are going to be selling there homes just to get a card that will allow a single movement in a game.if you are willing to pay high they will sell even higher.the rise in cost will never end because there are alwayes people who will be willing to buy.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 06/10/06 12:48:27 PM]
Reply

[1-2]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

11:08 pm | Apple: We Received 4 – 5 Thousands Requests from U.S. Law Enforcements, Refused to Fulfill As Many As We Could. Apple Committed to Customer Privacy, Explains How It Works with Law Enforcement Organizations

11:04 pm | SanDisk Enhances Flashsoft Software for Server-Side SSD Caching. FlashSoft 3.2 Software Adds Support for Multiple SSDs and SSD Mirroring

8:15 pm | AMD Unveils Server Strategy and Roadmap. AMD Adds Berlin, Seattle and Warsaw Processors into Roadmap

7:38 pm | Nvidia Set to Radically Change Business Model, License Graphics Cores to Others. Nvidia Takes ARM, Imagination Technologies Route, Intends to License Kepler Graphics Tech

Monday, June 17, 2013

11:57 pm | Oculus VR Raises $16 Million in Funding from Venture Capital Funds. Venture Capitalists Invest into Oculus VR Virtual Reality Platform

11:48 pm | Accelerators and Co-Processors Set to Dominate Big Data at High Performance Computing Sites . IDC: Intel Xeon Phi and Nvidia Tesla Running Neck to Neck to Supercomputer Leadership

11:33 pm | Microsoft and Best Buy to Open Up Over 600 Windows Stores. Microsoft and Best Buy to Open Up Stores-Within-A-Store

11:21 pm | Intel Haswell-E to Pack Eight Cores, Quad-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller. Intel Preps Series Performance Boost with Next Year’s Enthusiast Desktop Platform

5:08 pm | Sony Ups PlayStation 4 Internal Shipments Projections. Sony: Demand for PlayStation 4 Will Exceed Supply

1:41 pm | Intel Unleashes Next-Generation Xeon Phi “Knights Landing” Co-Processor. Intel Unveils 14nm Xeon Phi “Knights Landing” Chip

12:40 pm | Samsung Reveals Ultra-Fast PCI-Express SSD for Ultra-Slim Notebook PCs. Samsung’s PCIe SSD for Notebooks Has 1400MB/s Read Speed

10:41 am | AMD FX-9000 Family Microprocessors Cost from $500 to $1000. Pricing of AMD FX-9000 Processors Mimics Pricing of Intel HEDT Products