After Toshiba decided to withdraw itself from the war of formats by promising to cease manufacturing of HD DVD equipment, it is widely believed that Blu-ray disc (BD) format has bright future. However, the actual battle for Sony-backed technology is ahead and the main enemy is conventional DVD that is used in hundreds of millions of households.
“Blu-ray disc has passed its first real test by beating HD-DVD. But a much bigger challenge now lies ahead if BD is to become as successful as DVD, and content owners, retailers and manufacturers must now demonstrate that they can work together to promote BD effectively,” said David Mercer, principal analyst at Strategy Analytics.
A major challenge lies ahead if the home video industry is to persuade hundreds of millions of DVD owners that they should switch to a completely new format. DVD players nowadays cost less than $100 and many of the newer devices can offer higher image quality thanks to upscaling techniques.
Another challenge for the Blu-ray disc Association (BDA) is to persuade end-users to actually buy new movies on a physical disc, but not rent or buy them from services like Apple iTunes or Microsoft Xbox Live. Even though high-definition content available online is much lower quality compared to movies on Blu-ray or HD DVD, end-users who see no major difference between DVD and high-def content in general are likely to stick to online services instead of getting rather expensive players and discs.
Strategy Analytics company calls the industry to unite behind “a major promotional campaign to push Blu-ray disc as the preferred optical disc standard for the high-definition age”. But besides promoting Blu-ray technology high-definition TV-sets should be promoted as well. In fact, considering that only a fraction of consumers in Europe or the USA have HDTVs, it is highly unlikely that a high-definition video format may get popular overnight.
Strategy Analytics predicts that cumulative sales of standalone Blu-ray disc players, excluding games consoles, PCs and other devices, will reach more that 100 million units worldwide by 2012, if the consumer electronics industry succeeds in popularization of high-definition video.
Comments currently:
10
Discussion started: 02/20/08 12:06:08 PM
Latest comment: 02/21/08 08:40:45 PM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-4]
1.
Why should consumers pay more money for a copy protected format, because that's what all this is about....DRM...no thanks...I'll save my money instead of making Sony richer than it already is.
[
Posted by: Louie

|
Date: 02/20/08 12:06:08 PM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)
- collapse thread
DRM aside, BR is about higher resolution video at higher quality. It's also about higher quality audio, although this seems to me much less needed.
(And there's the 25GB for -R discs. But that's not the focus of the article.)
[
Posted by: shae

|
Date: 02/20/08 05:19:29 PM]
iTunes also use DRM as well
[
Posted by: Fuck

|
Date: 02/20/08 07:00:17 PM]
2.
1st I live in australia with a 1.5mb conection with serious dropout issues, How freakin long would it take to download/stream an entire movie. 2nd I bought a ps3 to play games, costs nothing to play online and plays blue ray is a Bonus. Before anyone coments, yes it sucks with dropouts but is infinatly cheaper
[
Posted by: Chris

|
Date: 02/20/08 06:18:56 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Agree. In many countries (e.g. Australia) which internet is charged in usage bases, it will bring u another cost if u download or stream such video contents in large size. Sometimes it may even more costly than a physical media + HD player.
Also that fucking DRM making u have to backup everything, cost u money on storage solution.
In the end, physical media like CD/DVD/BD usually have 2nd hand value, while those DRM do not!
[
Posted by: Silly

|
Date: 02/20/08 06:56:36 PM]
3.
Did DVD need to fight against VHS 10 yrs ago?
Does it means that Core2Duo has to fight against Pentium3?
So called upscaling techniques implemented in low end devices are using just bluring filters to make ur video smoother but blurer!
[
Posted by: Silly

|
Date: 02/20/08 06:51:41 PM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)
- collapse thread
Not, but it was also superior in convenience as well as image and audio quality. Joe Sixpack won't feel the difference is as dramatic this time around. The best way is for Blu-ray to just be THE player available on shelves and THE ROM drive. Sorta like how when you buy a writer for your computer, you just buy the DVD writer, not get faced with a decision to buy a CD writer or a DVD writer.
[
Posted by: lonechicken

|
Date: 02/21/08 02:02:41 PM]
>>won't feel the difference is as dramatic this time around.
Becox ur TV is fucking bad only.
DVD quality is unacceptable when shown in big screen even with upscaler, not cheapie PC!
[
Posted by: Silly

|
Date: 02/21/08 08:39:22 PM]
4.
With the vast majority of plasma/LCD screens in use ATM having around ~ 1366x768 res there is no real PQ benefit using BR and I cant see users dashing out to buy (me included) new 1080p screens AND blu-ray players just for the sake of a slightly better picture
Also the difference in quality between DVD and BR is nothing compared to the huge PQ and audio improvements DVD offered over VHS
[
Posted by: alpha0ne

|
Date: 02/21/08 08:35:03 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
I think u are better to phone up to the clinic to arange for a detail eye and ear check up!
[
Posted by: Doctor

|
Date: 02/21/08 08:40:45 PM]
[1-4]