News
 

Bookmark and Share

(2) 

Thomson, a well-known maker of various consumer electronics, has introduced mp3HD, the latest addition to the mp3 family. The new mp3HD format allows mathematically lossless compression of audio material while preserving backward compatibility to the mp3 standard. But while the format promises ultimate quality, it remains to be seen whether it is adopted by hardware makers and content vendors.

“Over the past years, most of the music download services have adopted mp3 as their format of choice. By introducing this new mp3HD format, Thomson enables users and content providers to enjoy ultimate audio quality while preserving the convenience of the mp3 format,” said Rocky Caldwell, general manager, mp3 and audio licensing for Thomson.

mp3HD is a lossless audio codec with bitrates for music approximately 500Kb/s to 900Kb/s that is backward compatible with mp3 since the standard presupposes embedding of standard-definition mp3 track in the same mp3 container that contains mp3HD track.

While the transition to high-definition video and audio will indisputably spur interest towards lossless audio, it remains to be seen whether content vendors and hardware/software vendors embrace the new format. For instance, Junodownload.com store sells lossless music in FLAC and WAV formats, but does not support APE or other lossless audio formats.

Compatibility with existing MP3 equipment should help the format to get more widespread. However, since an average 4 minute track with 876Kb/s bitrate in mp3HD format requires 26MB of storage space, usage of mp3HD on mainstream mp3 players will hardly be widespread due to limited storage space.

mp3HD technology is now available to both software and hardware manufacturers for licensing.

Tags: Thomson, MP3

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 03/26/09 05:23:12 PM
Latest comment: 03/27/09 04:01:18 AM

[1-2]

1. 
Ok, this is weird! So the say that the mp3HD offers losless quality but requires 26MB of space!!! 26MB for 4 min song???? Well an uncompressed wav in 45MB, while a file at 320kbs (top quality) is at ~10MB. The question is, why the hell in the world I need this HD codec since the listening qualitiy will be equaly to any 320kbs mp3???!? And yeah, if I compress the WAV file with 7zip or RAR I can get at least 24-25MB from a 45MB file. Then, what's the catch???
0 0 [Posted by: TAViX  | Date: 03/26/09 05:23:12 PM]
Reply

2. 
EPIC FAIL .... worthless codec
0 0 [Posted by: 3Dkiller  | Date: 03/27/09 04:01:18 AM]
Reply

[1-2]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

10:53 am | AMD to Cut Prices on FX-9000, Other FX Processors: New Prices Revealed. AMD to Make FX Chips More Affordable, Discontinue Low-End Models

10:32 am | LG to Introduce World’s First Curved 21:9 Ultra-Wide Display. LG Brings Curved Displays to Gamers, Professionals

9:59 am | AMD Readies FX-8370, FX-8370E Microprocessors. AMD Preps Two New “Mainstream” FX Chips

Monday, August 4, 2014

4:04 pm | HGST Shows-Off World’s Fastest SSD Based on PCM Memory. Phase-Change Memory Power’s World’s Fastest Solid-State Drive

Monday, July 28, 2014

6:02 pm | Microsoft’s Mobile Strategy Seem to Fail: Sales of Lumia and Surface Remain Low. Microsoft Still Cannot Make Windows a Popular Mobile Platform

12:11 pm | Intel Core i7-5960X “Haswell-E” De-Lidded: Twelve Cores and Alloy-Based Thermal Interface. Intel Core i7-5960X Uses “Haswell-EP” Die, Promises Good Overclocking Potential