News
 

Bookmark and Share

(4) 

Even though Apple sells its iPad for the starting price of $499, the actual manufacturing cost of the device is around $260, a teardown analysis by iSuppli market research firm has revealed. It appears that Apple makes a vast amount of money both on the device itself as well as content and supporting services that it will eventually sell to the iPad owners.

Display – The Most Expensive Component of iPad

“While the iPad has the potential to change the game in the computing, wireless and consumer worlds, it already has changed the game of how many electronic products are – and will be – designed,” said Andrew Rassweiler, director and principal analyst and teardown services manager for iSuppli.

Based on its physical teardown, iSuppli estimates the BOM of the low-end 16GB, non-3G iPad at $250.60. When manufacturing expenses are added, the cost rises to $259.60.

The single most expensive component in the iPad is the display, priced at $65 and representing 25.9% of the product’s bill of materials (BOM). The display is a 9.7” diagonal, 262K-color IPS TFT-LCD with a resolution of 1024x768 pixels.

The next most expensive component is the touch screen assembly at a cost of $30, or 12 percent of the BOM. The touch screen assembly is 9.7-inches in the diagonal dimension and uses capacitive technology. The supplier of the assembly is Wintek.

Coming in at third in terms of expense is the NAND-type flash memory, at a cost of $29.50 for the low-end 16GB iPad. The NAND in the iPad dissected by iSuppli was supplied by Samsung Electronics, but Apple likely also is employing other sources of these commodity parts.

The fourth most expensive component is the battery, at $21, representing 8.4% of the total BOM. The 3.7V battery is a lithium polymer battery pack that employs value-added modular design that combines two cells into a single pack that is more easily replaceable than two individual cells wired in. In the iPad torn down by iSuppli, the battery cells were supplied by Amperex Technology and the pack provided by Dynapack. We had not expected to see the battery cells kitted as a pack, so such a design element clearly suggests these batteries are meant to be replaced at some point.

Apple iPad – The New Paradigm for Building Mobile Devices

With more than 40% of its BOM dedicated to the display, touch-screen and other user interface components, Apple’s iPad represents a radical departure in electronic design compared to conventional products, according to a teardown conducted by iSuppli.

The combined costs of user-interface-related components in the iPad amounts to $109.50, representing 43.7% of total BOM of the 16GB, non-3G version of the iPad torn down by iSuppli.

“The iPad’s design represents a new paradigm in terms of electronics cost structure and electronic content. Conventional notebook PCs are ‘motherboard-centric,’ with all the other functions in the system –such as the display, the keyboard and audio – peripheral to the central microprocessor and the main printed-circuit board (PCB) at the core. With the iPad, this is reversed. Everything is human-machine-interface-centric, with the PCB and integrated circuits (ICs) all there to facilitate the display of content as well as user inputs,” said Mr. Rassweiler.

But Apple’s approach to invest maximum into design, display, touch-screen and other user interface components has a lot of shortcomings. Although the manufacturing cost of the 16GB device is nearly two times lower compared to its actual selling price, the company decided to save on other components, which resulted in massive amount of drawbacks:

  • One of the most important shortcomings of Apple iPad is the absence of Adobe Flash support.
  • Another crucial disadvantage of the Apple iPad is the lack of web-cam. Even the cheapest netbooks are usually equipped with one and the vast majority of modern phones can make video calls.
  • The nonexistence of multi-tasking is a yet another strong disadvantage of the iPad. It makes impossible to leave tasks (instant messenger, a book, a game, etc) in the background to quickly check a web-site and write an email, a rather strange thing for an Internet-centric mobile device.
  • The absence of high-definition screen (1024x768 resolution supported) and high-definition output (up to 576p resolution supported) on the iPad seems to be odd.
  • A very strange thing about the iPad is the lack of support of GSM voice calls. Of course, Apple needs to sell iPhones, hardly anyone will use a 680 gram device as a mobile phone in general and besides, no notebooks or netbooks with WWAN support allow to make voice calls. Nevertheless, the feature might be appreciated by some users.
  • Apple iPad also does not have USB ports.
  • Apple iPad does not feature SD card reader to transfer photos or other content.

Tags: Apple, iPad

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 04/09/10 08:57:06 AM
Latest comment: 04/13/10 06:01:27 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-3]

1. 
You guys are forgetting the Apple logo. It automatically doubles the price.
0 0 [Posted by: JonMCC33  | Date: 04/09/10 08:57:06 AM]
Reply

2. 
I'm eagerly awaiting another company to build something similar to the iPad that has a camera, multitasking and flash support with at least 9 hours of battery life .. And ... of course ... sell it for 399$. Riiiight .... Like that will ever happen in the next 2 years ...
0 0 [Posted by: East17  | Date: 04/10/10 10:30:42 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Actually, I've been waiting for this kind of device for about 3+ years now.. And it still sucks compared to what I want.
If someone would take a netbook's "insides" and put it inside a 10" touchscreen tablet, with usual stuff (SD reader, USB ports, etc) - now that would be worth 399$. I'd be running normal Windows OS on it, with custom touch-centric UI of course.. so that it supports all normal apps.
But anyway, seems I'll be waiting another several years before they do that. Not that they can't it's just that no one wants to do it :/
And this... toy... It's hardly any better than original tablets. It scored fine with size/form factor, yet it threw out everything else, and kept the price high. Yuck!
0 0 [Posted by: LuxZg  | Date: 04/11/10 10:12:40 AM]
Reply

3. 
I'm not exactly sure who would buy such a device? No Adobe Flash support for a portable browser? No USBs??? For $400??? In what year do we live in??? I don't know about you, but I can easily manage my browsing with the keyboard/touchpad combo and rather invest the bulk of the expenses of the human interface to a decent CPU/GPU combo....and some USBs ^_^.
0 0 [Posted by: solearis  | Date: 04/13/10 06:01:27 AM]
Reply

[1-3]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Monday, July 21, 2014

10:08 pm | Japan Display Begins to Mass Produce IPS-NEO Displays. JDI Begins to Mass Produce Rival for AMOLED Panels

12:56 pm | Microsoft to Fire 18,000 Employees to Boost Efficiency. Microsoft to Perform Massive Job Cut Ever Following Acquisition of Nokia

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

6:11 am | Apple Teams Up with IBM to Make iPhone and iPad Ultimate Tools for Businesses and Enterprises. IBM to Sell Business-Optimized iPhone and iPad Devices

Monday, July 14, 2014

6:01 am | IBM to Invest $3 Billion In Research of Next-Gen Chips, Process Technologies. IBM to Fund Development of 7nm and Below Process Technologies, Help to Create Post-Silicon Future

5:58 am | Intel Postpones Launch of High-End “Broadwell-K” Processors to July – September, 2015. High-End Core i “Broadwell” Processors Scheduled to Arrive in Q3 2015

5:50 am | Intel Delays Introduction of Core M “Broadwell” Processors Further. Low-Power Broadwell Chips Due in Late 2014