Bookmark and Share

Tags

32nm 40nm 45nm AMD Apple ATI ATIC Atom Business Cypress DRAM E-Book Evergreen Fermi Flash Geforce Globalfoundries GT300 IBM Intel Microsoft Nforce Nintendo Nokia Nvidia OCZ Radeon Semiconductor Sony SSD

News

BenQ, a subsidiary of Acer and a maker of personal computer components, is targeted to begin manufacturing of LCD displays with 8ms response time as early as this month. Such move is likely to popularize LCDs among users looking for rapid response time, even though 8ms is still behind conventional CRT displays.

The FP71E+ display from BenQ is a 17” monitor with 1280x1024 native resolution, 600:1 contrast, 300 cd/m² luminosity, 4.7kg weight, D-Sub and DVI-I connectors as well as world-record response time of 8ms. Fastest TFTs have so far have boasted with 12ms or 16ms response time. While such response time is extraordinary for LCDs, conventional CRTs have response time of less than 1ms, which means that flat panels are still behind cathode-ray tubes in terms of response time.

BenQ did not reveal any peculiarities of the forthcoming FP71E+ monitor, e.g., what type of panel was used to make the product, but said that the company had to utilize its Intrinsic Preoperty II as well as Sensey technologies for this display. Typically TN panels sport the fastest response time, however, their main disadvantage is relatively narrow view angle, about 140° in both vertical and horizontal directions, even though some particular displays offer more advanced specifications.

Even though BenQ does not disclose any pricing information on the FP71E+ display, some sources report that the firm is likely to drive the 8ms panels into the mainstream market in early 2005, which means that the pricing in the mentioned timeframe is expected to be inline with usual LCDs that cost from $400 to $600 for 17” models.

Other makers of TFT monitors, such as Philips Electronics and ViewSonic, are also expected to rapidly take LCDs with 8ms response time into the general market as early as in Q1 2005.

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 09/10/04 02:51:46 AM
Latest comment: 12/29/04 09:43:39 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-2]

1. 
[b][u]Large size LCD monitor prices crash[/u][/b]
And there's more falling to come
[i]By Inquirer staff: 03 September 2004, 09:21[/i]

[b]LACK OF DEMAND,[/b] over supply and huge stocks of product in the channel mean prices of large sized LCD pannels fell more than expected in August, research firm [i]iSuppli[/i] said.

That, according to a report from the firm, meant a "near time headache" for suppliers but could mean bargains for buyers. The LCD panels used in desktop PC monitors fell the most, said iSuppli in a report to its customers, meaning prices for 15-inch and 17-inch panels fell by around 18 to 19 per cent last month.

Despite hopes that sales of LCD TVs would pick up because of the Olympic Games last month, the reality was that sales were slow. And sales of LCD monitors appeared to be just as slow. Some desktop monitor firms have begun slashing prices on 15-inch and 17-inch LCD monitors already - there are stocks in the distribution panel getting dusty.

The low end street price of a 17-inch desktop PC monitor was $350 by the end of August, said iSuppli. Fifteen inch products at the low end were $300. However, there's still resistance to slashing prices across the board.

The market research firm preducted that by October, the average price of 15-inch panels could fall by another 10 to 15 per cent, and that will eventually be reflected in street sales. Prices for LCD TV units are also set to fall to a more realistic level for the average consumer. µ

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18249

Oscar: I wish every manufacturer would get what the market is trying to tell them and stop selling those 6-bit [i]with dithering[/i] LCD monitors right now. Who the hell would want to pay hundreds of dollars to buy a monitor that can't even display TrueColour in 2004? I have been going through tons and tons of specifications in the past few days, and the only 17" monitor I would [i]remotely[/i] consider purchasing is [url=http://www.samsung.ca/cgi-bin/nasecabc/en/b2c/product/ product_detail.jsp?prod_id=MJ17ASSS]Samsung SyncMaster 712N-Silver[/url] (16.7 M colours, 12ms response time), but then I really wouldn't because it doesn't have a digital input. So there you have it: even if I were in the market today, there isn't one single LCD monitor that I would want to buy regardless of its price.
[Posted by: Oscar  | Date: 09/10/04 02:51:46 AM]

2. 
hmm months old article supposed to be 8ms lcds in weeks i dont see any lol ggs
[Posted by: sigh  | Date: 12/20/04 11:47:24 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Monday, November 30, 2009

10:14 pm | Smartbook AG Offers Netbooks with Swarovski Crystals. Smartbook AG Begins to Sell $3000 Notebook

2:03 pm | Sony: 3D TV-Sets May Account for Half of HDTV Sales in Three Years. Sony Expects Stereoscopic 3D Television to Become the Next Big Thing

6:45 am | Sony Commercializes the First TransferJet Chips. Sony Unveils Close-Proximity TransferJet Controllers

Sunday, November 29, 2009

11:51 pm | Microsoft Expects Project Natal to Be a Giant Leap for TV. Microsoft: Natal to Replace Remote Controls for TVs

Saturday, November 28, 2009

12:12 pm | Netbooks to Get Larger Screens, Discrete Graphics – Report. Netbooks with 10” and 12” Panels Set to Become Mainstream in 2010 – Manufacturers