Search<%BANNER[news_130_l]%>
<%BANNER[mem130]%>
InformationX-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news. <%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
<%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%> |
|
<%BANNER[banner_468x60]%>
OtherX-bit Poll: Enthusiasts Eager to Buy Expensive Graphics Cards.Hardware Consumers Prefer to Buy Luxurious Graphics CardsCategory: Other by Anton Shilov [ 12/02/2004 | 04:51 PM ]
Despite of recent uptick of prices for high-end graphics cards, enthusiasts are more than enthusiastic about pricey graphics boards based on the latest chips from companies like ATI Technologies and NVIDIA Corp., says recently conducted poll by X-bit labs web-site.
Roughly 60% of respondents said the most expensive hardware in their computers was their graphics card; in contrast, only 22% named their central processing unit the most expensive part. Quite surprising, but 6% of surveyed spent largest part of their PC budget on memory, while only 5% and 4% invested heavily into hard disk drive(s) and mainboards, respectively. The poll only asked about internal hardware of a PC. Top graphics cards from makers affiliated with ATI or NVIDIA usually cost $400 - $550, while the most powerful processors are typically quoted from $700 to over $1000. Another poll shows that more than 50% of X-bit labs readers spend from $1000 to $2000 on their gaming personal computers, 9% and 6% of respondents spend up to $2500 and $3000 on their PCs, while only 5% of X-bit labs can afford a computer that costs more than $3000 and up to $6000. 7% answered their budget on PC is unlimited, but they are interested in speed. However, about 21% of respondents said their budget was within $999 range. X-bit labs believes that the results of both polls indicate that average enthusiasts typically buy systems with pretty advanced graphics cards and processors, but do not pay great attention on feature-set and capabilities of other components, namely mainboards and memory modules. Still, X-bit labs thinks that systems with the price of more than $2000 typically features very high-end parts, probably top-of-the-range graphics cards, premium mainboards and memory modules, but not the fastest microprocessors. Keeping in mind that loads of enthusiasts typically do not upgrade components like DVD-ROMs and audio-cards, it may be assumed that even those, who spend around $1500 on PCs get finest hardware from leading makers. The X-bit labs’ polls have surveyed more than 8 thousand of respondents among technology enthusiasts in November, 2004. Related news
<%BANNER[banner_468x30]%>
|
News Categories<%BANNER[right_130x130_1]%>
Latest NewsFriday, July 25, 200812:31 pm | Video Channel Vendors Demand Graphics Cards Suppliers to Recall Potentially Faulty Nvidia GeForce Graphics Cards. Resellers Want to Return Potentially Faulty Nvidia GeForce Graphics Boards to Makers 9:00 am | Other AMD Denies Manufacturing Operations Spin Off Plan. AMD: Only Real Men Have Fabs Thursday, July 24, 200811:59 pm | Other HP Set to Make Voodoo-Branded Systems Available Worldwide. HP’s Voodoo Computers to Be Available Through HP Sales Network 11:06 pm | CPU Intel Rumoured to Speed Up Nehalem Launch on Desktop. Intel’s Bloomfield Processor to Emerge in September – Rumours Wednesday, July 23, 20089:58 pm | Storage Western Digital Releases VelociRaptor for Enterprises. WD Launches Enterprise Version of VelociRaptor 5:42 pm | Multimedia Game Developers Unlikely to Take Advantage of Improved Nintendo Wii Controller Soon. Nintendo Wii MotionPlus – A Surprise for Game Developers 4:26 pm | Memory Hynix Semiconductor to Shut Down Fab in the U.S. Hynix Semiconductor to Close its Eugene Fabrication Facility 3:35 pm | CPU AMD to Discuss Rival for Intel Atom Towards Year End. AMD’s Competitor for Intel Atom in the Works, Says Company 12:29 pm | Storage SanDisk Blames Windows Vista for Low Performance of Solid State Drives. SanDisk: Vista Is Not Optimized for Flash Memory Solid State Disk |
|