News

Apple Computer quietly reduced pricing of its 20” iMac computers featuring IBM PowerPC 970FX (G5) processors. The products now cost less than iMac computers featuring Intel Core Duo chips with similar screen size which may mean that the computer maker has plans to get rid of those machines as quickly as possible.

Without much noise, Apple’s online store began to sell 20” iMac 2.1GHz G5 machines recently at the price of $1499, down from $1699, or $200 less compared to the price on the same computer before and the cost of 20” iMac running Intel Core Duo 2.0GHz that features two processing engines. Apple did not give any official explanations for the move.

Earlier this week it was revealed that Apple does not have enough 17” iMac G5 computers to fulfill the orders, possibly, due to low inventory levels, which observers explained by Apple’s intention to get rid of the G5-based computers as quickly as possible. In effect, the 17” iMac G5 was claimed to have been shifted to end of life status that explains their reportedly insufficient availability.

Another report earlier this week claimed that sales of all Macintosh computers tumbled following announcement of the first Macs featuring Intel Core Duo processors. The reasons for slowed-down sales of Macintosh products were predicted back last year: performance of software originally developed for PowerPC-based computers is not high on the new machines since the programs run using emulation software, but not a lot of consumers want to spend their money on the Mac G5 machines that are set to face end of live in several months time and and which are already slower in some applications.

Apple Computer did not comment on the unofficial stories.

Discussion

Comments currently: 1
Discussion started: 02/02/06 02:33:52 PM
Latest comment: 02/02/06 02:33:53 PM

[1-1]

1. 
This makes sense for a couple of reasons. It makes sense that Apple is trying to get rid of the POWER based machines, and has discontinued production. Discounting discontinued lines is pretty much inevitable. Also, with the 17" machines in short supply, by moving the price lower they will probably make those that wanted the 17" monitors very happy as they can get a 20" for not much more.

Looks like they overestimated demand for the 20" and underestimated demand for the 17", and these two moves will attempt to compensate for that as well as make Mac customers happy since they can get the bigger monitor. Seems like a smart move by Apple.
[Posted by: TA152H  | Date: 02/02/06 02:33:53 PM]

[1-1]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS