<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[news_300]%>

News

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

Microsoft Corp., the world’s leading maker of software, is rumoured to release its next-generation operating system (OS) much later than it was expected originally. The reasons for the possible setback are unclear, but normally Microsoft explains its delays with necessity to meet quality bars.

“We are currently in the planning stages for Windows 7 and expect it will take approximately 3 years to develop. The specific release date will be determined once the company meets its quality bar for release,” a statement by Microsoft published at WinVistaClub web-site reads.

Early in 2007 the company indicated that it would replace Windows Vista in two or two and a half years from them. However, already in mid-2007 the world’s largest software firm said that it would take it three years to create the new code-named Vienna operating system, which official name is projected to be Windows 7.

Historically Microsoft released a new desktop operating system every two to three years, at least, this was true for Windows 95, 98, ME and XP and was not particularly true for workstation OSes – there was a four-year gap between the NT4 and 2000. However, the latest operating system – Windows Vista – shipped over five years after the XP because the company had to reassign software developers to patch the latter and release service pack 2. Perhaps, Microsoft foresees necessity for additional patches for Vista, or, perhaps, it does not expect the demand for a new OS to be high two years after the launch of Windows Vista.

“Windows Vista is being adopted by businesses at a rate that is similar to past releases. In the business market there are early, mainstream and late adopters, with the majority of businesses falling into the category of mainstream. We’re seeing positive indicators that we’re already starting to move from the early adoption phase into the mainstream, and that more and more businesses are beginning their planning and deployment of Windows Vista,” the statement by Microsoft claims.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Related news

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_2]%>
Comments currently: 9
Discussion started: 01/29/08 04:20:46 PM
Latest comment: 01/30/08 09:35:36 AM

[1-9]

1. 
Given their previos track record regarding OS this comes as really big surprise.
Microsoft stinks when it comes to keeping schedules. They always did.
[Posted by: Redzo | Date: 01/29/08 04:20:46 PM]

2. 
I am not surprised
[Posted by: nuff | Date: 01/29/08 05:28:29 PM]

3. 
Neither am I. I was just ironic ;-)
[Posted by: Redzo | Date: 01/29/08 06:10:47 PM]

4. 
"perhaps, it (Microsoft) does not expect the demand for a new OS to be high two years after the launch of Windows Vista."

Is anyone really surprised by this? Junior high school Econ 101: When a particular market is dominated by a monopoly, technological advances come at a much slower pace, and at a higher price. I never thought I would see the day of the $200 to $400 operating system. MS is going to milk Vista and XP for all they're worth.
[Posted by: EndPCNoise | Date: 01/29/08 06:50:17 PM]

5. 
This article is just rediculous. What he actually said as that Windows 7 "it will take approximately 3 years to develop". If he meant 3 years since Vista RTM then that's late 2009.
He DID NOT say 3 years FROM NOW. It seemes like people like to overlook this because it makes it less "news" and complain-worthy.
[Posted by: negative creep | Date: 01/29/08 07:58:34 PM]

6. 
You can't seriously think it will take MS 3 years to develop a new OS do you? If MS released a new OS every three years, then Vista should have been released in 2004. It was instead 3 years lat and released in 2007.

I highly doubt the next OS will be released before 2011, especially how they f***ed Vista up so much that they will need to move developers away from vienna to work on the vista fixes.
[Posted by: Soloman02 | Date: 01/29/08 08:45:34 PM]

7. 
Good idea on Microsoft's part. Give time to develop Windows 7 properly and also make Vista as robust as Windows XP SP2.

The funny part is all those people saying they were going to "skip" Vista in favor of Windows 7 will be waiting that much longer. They might just stumble into the same bug ridden OS that Vista started out to be.
[Posted by: Jon | Date: 01/29/08 10:31:22 PM]

8. 
Meh for me the can even take 6y to make windows7 aslong that is is a decent one the may have all the time the want
Iam still happy with win2k and winXP to work on for now and guess a few year more on it wount change mutch
[Posted by: Eddi | Date: 01/30/08 01:55:32 AM]

9. 
"Good idea on Microsoft's part. Give time to develop Windows 7 properly and also make Vista as robust as Windows XP SP2."

"Meh for me the can even take 6y to make windows7 aslong that is is a decent one the may have all the time the want"

How's that horse and buggy workin' for ya, and are you still communicating by sending smoke signals?

If there were any REAL competition in the OS market, I bet MS would crank out a BETTER OS in less than 3 years time for $100 or less.

Maybe I expect too much from my OS.
[Posted by: EndPCNoise | Date: 01/30/08 09:35:36 AM]

[1-9]

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Thursday, August 21, 2008

9:09 pm | Intel Quietly Revealed Its Super-Fast SSD. To Start Shipping in September

8:29 pm | Intel to Release First 6-Core CPU in September. In the Beginning for Servers Only

1:54 pm | Intel Offers to Power Laptops Wirelessly. Intel Demos Wireless Resonant Energy Link

12:33 pm | Sony Announces New PlayStation 3 with Enlarged Hard Disk Drive. Sony to Release PlayStation 3 160GB for $499

11:30 am | Nvidia Plans to Add Another Graphics Card into GTX 200 Lineup. Nvidia Readies “Upgraded” GeForce GTX 260 – Rumours