News
 

Bookmark and Share

(4) 

Intel Corp. admits that IBM's approach for optical interconnections for chips is very interesting and progressive, but claims that its own way is more efficient in terms of performance and manufacturability.

IBM's CMOS Integrated Silicon Nanophotonics combine electrical and optical devices on a single chip. The new IBM technology can be produced on the front-end of a standard CMOS manufacturing line and requires no new or special tooling. With this approach, silicon transistors can share the same silicon layer with silicon nanophotonics devices. According to IBM, the new technology adds just a few more processing modules to a standard CMOS fabrication flow, to enable a variety of silicon nanophotonics components, such as: modulators, germanium photodetectors and ultra-compact wavelength-division multiplexers to be integrated with high-performance analog and digital CMOS circuitry. As a result, single-chip optical communications transceivers can now be manufactured in a standard CMOS foundry, rather than assembled from multiple parts made with expensive compound semiconductor technology.

By contrast, Intel proposes to make chips using the latest process technology on contemporary manufacturing foundries and then add all the necessary elements needed for optical interconnections.

"This [IBM] research is another example of others also validating that silicon photonics is the path to high bandwidth, low-cost optical communications. While this research is interesting, there are still many challenges to commercialise this approach such as integration of lasers and integration with advanced future transistor processes," said Nick Knupffer, an Intel's global communications manager, told in an interview with ZDNet UK.

According to the representative of Intel, IBM's approach simply makes manufacturing difficult. For example, chipmakers will have to develop fabrication processes with optical-related elements in mind.

"Keeping the CMOS and photonics separate will allow us to use the most energy-efficient, leading edge manufacturing process for electronics as we scale link speeds. For exascale systems, energy efficiency is a major concern. [...] Although [Intel's approach to nanophotonics] does require the bonding of indium phosphide to the silicon, this is done at the chip or wafer level, allowing us to create all the lasers we need in one bonding step," said Mr. Knupffer.

Tags: IBM, Intel, Semiconductor

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 12/05/10 05:24:55 AM
Latest comment: 12/06/10 06:44:31 PM

[1-4]

1. 
Lol, Intel getting envious!
0 0 [Posted by: DIREWOLF75  | Date: 12/05/10 05:24:55 AM]
Reply

2. 
Sure .. keeping them separate is "better" and that's why everybody is hading towards INTEGRATION . Bleah, I hate INTEL FUD . Ours is better because ... because we don't have what they have and ... and ... in fact ... theirs is better and we waaaaaant it
0 0 [Posted by: East17  | Date: 12/05/10 06:20:39 AM]
Reply

3. 
I doubt Intel is getting nervous. It sounds to me like they have already been down this road IBM is going down and already deemed it not too viable right now.

They seem to know the best route right now and that implies they are a few steps ahead of IBM at this point.

I remember Intel talking about optical communications inside the chips long long ago.

I assure you this is not FUD, just questioning the practicality of the claims, as it pertains to manufacturing and making money.
0 0 [Posted by: iLLz  | Date: 12/05/10 04:31:55 PM]
Reply

4. 
IBM's chips and news always seem cutting edge. Their CELL chip for example. The PowerPC range is another powerful design. Why is IBM content with make a few chips for super-computers and blades? They used to be in the Home Computer arena when they powered Apple's computers. Why have they given up on that? What this industry needs more than anything right now is new blood, fresh ideas and different approches.

If there were only 2 car manufactures in the world think how boring and stale designs would become.
0 0 [Posted by: loadwick  | Date: 12/06/10 06:44:31 PM]
Reply

[1-4]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Friday, May 24, 2013

6:09 pm | Second-Generation Kinect Sensor for Windows Due in 2014 – Microsoft. Microsoft Discloses Additional Details About Kinect 2

4:24 pm | New Technique May Open Up an Era of Atomic-Scale Semiconductor Devices. Atom-Scale Semiconductor Devices May Be Incoming, Thanks to New Researchers

Thursday, May 23, 2013

11:30 pm | Kinect Support Is Not Mandatory for Xbox One Video Games – Microsoft. Microsoft Will Not Require Compulsory Support of Kinect from Xbox One Games

11:20 pm | Thermaltake Publishes List of PSUs Compatible with Intel Cori i “Haswell” Chips. 20 PSUs from Thermaltake Are Compatible with Next-Gen Intel Chips

11:10 pm | European Amazon Stores Start to List Xbox One with €599 Price-Tag. Microsoft Xbox One May Cost €599 in Europe, If First Listings Are Correct

9:28 pm | Apple to Assemble Macs in Texas, Set to Manufacture Parts Across the U.S. Apple’s Plan to Move Production Back to U.S. Gets Shape

9:12 pm | Microsoft Confident in Lack of Quality Issues with Xbox One Hardware. Microsoft Vows Xbox One Will Not Have RROD-Like Issues

8:52 pm | AMD Officially Launches New-Generation APUs for Mobile Applications [UPDATED]. AMD Introduces Kabini, Temash and Richland Accelerated Processing Units

6:51 pm | OCZ Reveals Vertex 450 Solid-State Drives: High-End Performance at Mainstream Prices. OCZ Introduces New SSDs Based on Indilinx Barefoot 3 Controller

3:40 pm | Nvidia Unveils GeForce GTX 780: GK110-Based Consumer Solution for $649. Nvidia’s Cut Down Titan LE Becomes GeForce GTX 780