Bookmark and Share


Advanced Micro Devices said that despite of the fact that it is crucial for the company to popularize software that can use graphics processing units for computing, it would not create its own application store with appropriate software.

One of the reasons why general purpose computing on graphics processing units (GPGPU) has not gained a lot of traction on the mass market is because many consumers simply do not know which programs support GPGPU and continue to buy applications that utilize traditional x86 processing cores. One of the way to ensure that consumers get the right software is to sell or recommend them the programs that take advantage of their hardware. Nonetheless, AMD believes creating its own app store is not a correct way to achieve that.

"While we have considered the possibility of creating an AMD app store, we are more interested in helping consumers gain access to innovative applications, and not necessarily focused on creating a commercial app store. We do see a need for a centralized, one-stop location where users can easily find applications that are accelerated by AMD Fusion APU-powered PCs. And we believe there’s an important educational component that comes with introducing a new technology such as AMD Fusion. Information that helps users identify which applications and programs are most compatible with their usage needs would be a natural extension of the AMD Vision approach, which helps consumers select their PCs based on how they use it rather than speeds and feeds," said Neal Robison, senior director of content and application support at AMD, in an interview with X-bit labs.

There are a number of professional programs that can take advantage of GPU compute capabilities and can therefore run faster on AMD's Fusion accelerated processing units (APUs). However, at present APUs are not tailored for professional use, but are aimed at consumers. Unfortunately for AMD, few consumers actually know which programs can make use of GPUs apart from games and video playback software.

But encouraging consumers to get only APU/GPU-accelerated programs may not be a good idea from marketing perspective as some people may get the impression that AMD Fusion-based platforms can run only select applications truly well, which is not correct.

"Those, who acquire Fusion-based PCs really, really want to get applications that are going to make their devices perform really well. That would be a reason for having one central place. That [place] would prevent our partners among software developers from showcasing [their programs] on their own web-sites or other locations. [...] There are plenty of non-APU/GPU-accelerated applications that will perform very well on Fusion, so we have to look at how we will define what will be in that app store, if you will," added Mr. Robison.

AMD believes that going forward the majority of consumer-oriented microprocessors will integrate graphics cores and will thus challenge "standalone" central processing units without such accelerators. As a result, the importance of software applications that take advantage of GPUs is very high for AMD.

Tags: AMD, Fusion, Llano, zacate, Ontario, Business


Comments currently: 1
Discussion started: 03/23/11 04:41:54 AM
Latest comment: 03/23/11 04:41:54 AM


Ok .. no App Store .. but why isn't AMD doing ANYTHING ELSE ?!!

Like I've said before in the Fusion Talk article ... why isn't AMD even doing simple/little thing to improve its image and user experience.

Here I was talking about Neil Robinson, the guy responsible of software strategy at AMD :

So this is the guy that is not able to hire 20 programmers and come up with an encoding program that would get better results than INTEL's quick sync. Achieving this goal in 3~4 months using the huge amount of performance that Radeon 5xxx or 6xxx series card have to offer should not be that difficult.

That piece of software should have a special routine for Fusion CPUs that should result , at least, in a doubling of the performance of using only the x86 part of the Fusion CPUs. Not comparison with INTEL's Quick Sync needed here. The CPUs are not in the same class. But they should provide the buyer with an obvious benefit from having Fusion.

He is the guy that can't hire 3 people to always revise INTEL's compilers and provide patched versions to the open community.

Work with developers? Why not work with WinRAR developer and provide a special optimization when used with AMD CPUs and GPUs?

RAR Labs is a small company and they would enjoy even the smallest amount of funding/help/support.

Providing superior performance in video encoding and archiving would be very healthy for AMD's image that currently doesn't have a hardware solution that performances better than INTEL's counter part.

WTF is wrong with this guy ?

How come these simple actions seem to be out of his mind?!?!?

0 0 [Posted by: East17  | Date: 03/23/11 04:41:54 AM]


Add your Comment

Related news

Latest News

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

10:48 pm | LG’s Unique Ultra-Wide Curved 34” Display Finally Hits the Market. LG 34UC97 Available in the U.S. and the U.K.

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

12:52 pm | Lisa Su Appointed as New CEO of Advanced Micro Devices. Rory Read Steps Down, Lisa Su Becomes New CEO of AMD

Thursday, August 28, 2014

4:22 am | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

1:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

10:41 am | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture