Microsoft Corp's Windows 95 truly reinvented the PC experience and revolutionized the PC industry back sixteen years ago in 1995. This week Microsoft opened up Windows 8 development blog and said that its next-generation Windows 8, which will be available for public testing in the coming months, will be as revolutionary as the legendary Windows 95.
"So much has changed since Windows 95 - the last time Windows was significantly overhauled - when the 'desktop' metaphor was established. Today more than two out of three PCs are mobile (laptops, netbooks, notebooks, tablets, slates, convertibles, etc.). Nearly every PC is capable of wireless connectivity. Screen sizes range from under 10" to wall-sized screens and multiple HD screens. Storage has jumped from megabytes to terabytes and has moved up to the cloud," said Steven Sinofsky, the president of Windows and Windows Live division at Microsoft.

Although Microsoft continues to remain mum about the release date of Windows 8, many believe that the next-generation Windows will be launched in 2012. In its new blog, the world's largest designer of software plans to share how it focuses on performance, reliability, compatibility, security, and quality of Windows 8 and plans to continue the dialog around performance and fundamental engineering of Windows with its customers and end-users.
Microsoft previewed its Windows 8 in June and started by showing user experience and interface on a range of mobile devices. The graphics user interface (GUI) is one of the most important elements of operating systems as end-users interact with it every day. But Microsoft stresses that the new GUI along with compatibility with ARM-based system-on-chips are not the only innovations when it comes to Windows 8. The software giant claims it has engineered changes across the full range of Windows capabilities.

"We know people who care a lot about networking want to know our plans there. We know people who are invested heavily in storage want to know what is new in that area. Many want to know about performance and fundamentals. We know developers, IT pros, and gamers all want to know what's new for them. There is so much packed into Windows 8 and there are so many unique and important lenses through which to view Windows 8, and so we want to be sure to take the time to cover as many of these topics as possible, to build up a shared understanding of why we’ve taken Windows where we have. So in the next weeks we will just start talking specifics of features, since there is no obvious place to start given the varying perspectives. From fundamentals, to user interface, to hardware support, and more, if something is important to you, we promise we'll get to it in some form or another," said Mr. Sinofsky.
Tags: Microsoft, Windows
Comments currently:
12
Discussion started: 08/16/11 09:32:03 PM
Latest comment: 09/16/11 08:09:58 AM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-6]
1.
omg. I just bought Windows 7 to switch away from XP Pro. Guess I'll be ready for Windows 8 about 2015, if I live that long.
2
0
[
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter

|
Date: 08/16/11 09:32:06 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
MS said the same thing about Win7. So don't let the hype build up some grand expectations until we ya see how it looks and preforms on your PC if you so happen to upgrade.
1
0
[
Posted by: USAFANG67

|
Date: 08/17/11 01:12:55 PM]
2.
I hope Microsoft does more than give a pretty facelift to match its smartphone OS. Among the things that have unnecessarily bedeviled PC users since the days of '95 we may count:
- Plug & Play that doesn't. Few experiences are as frustrating as finding your new hardware isn't recognized properly by the system. If 8 can standardize minimum-spec code built in at the OS level to recognize the most commonly seen devices maybe we can finally kiss goodbye all those memories of unrecognized peripherals ruining your day.
- Thin is in. As slick as Win 7 is each new build brings with it unnecessary baggage. The inclusion of ancient bundled apps like Paint is, simply put, an embarrassment. In an age when a modern linux distro can fit on a modest USB Windows is straining to fit onto DVDs. Make the next OS boot up in ten seconds flat and load secondary system files later as needed.
- Easy networking and sharing. If I, a guy who's been in IT now for two decades, still get mortified when trying to interconnect computers how does that bode for grandma? Why is it that sharing my C drive is cloaked in umpteen security layers and then still cross-your-fingers and hope that it'll be useable on the other side?
- Why does Windows expect me to do things its way? Every time I want to download a file it insists, despite thousands of repeated redirections to my desktop, to stick it in some nested document folder I never use. Why is it that my desktop icons so often switch places for no good reason? A 21st OS should adapt from my patterns of usage.
- Stop being so greedy. Having a half dozen version of the same OS leads to confusion and ill-will. If you have to have multiple versions at all separate from consumer and server versions. That's it.
- Go cloud. The MS business model is too tied to physical media and pay-per-license. I ditched Outlook years ago for Gmail because there was no such thing as an online version of it. Google docs, free for all, is tempting me to ditch Office for the same reason. How about an online backup service built into the OS so I don't have to rely on a 3rd party? This is an essential mission of any OS.
- Innovation. I struggle to think of a single truly breakthrough Microsoft invention. Ok I take that back, let's give props for the Kinect. But in terms of OS for me to be wowed by Win 8 it has to have more substance than a gussied up GUI. I want to have a truly novel way of locating and organizing my files. I want to do what I want to do with speed and with the OS being invisible until I need it. I want more resiliency, not just stability, so that things don't stop working seemingly for the hell of it and, likewise, less dread thinking of what will go wrong when I plug in a new widget or install a new app. It'll be magic the day the whole thing just works without a too-long wait or too many nag screens or some other if and or but.
Remember MS, Windows is an OPERATING SYSTEM. It should perform three core functions: connect the machine with its various parts and peripherals, provide a platform for software and file management. The company should concentrate on optimizing that core experience and recognize that the bundled apps are at best gravy and at worst bloatware that gets in the way.
show the post
3
6
[
Posted by: rasiel

|
Date: 08/16/11 10:49:22 PM]
+ expand thread (3 answers)
- collapse thread
The sad part here is that you got 2 thubs down, while you just point out the obvious problems in windows.
For some people if you are not a blind fan and you see the problems, then you are the enemy and a hater.
Sad.
2
1
[
Posted by: nitro912gr

|
Date: 08/17/11 04:05:14 AM]
The question of using cloud applications is whether or not you trust your documents and data to a large corporation. As long as you don't value privacy and control over your data then the cloud is a great thing.
2
2
[
Posted by: user99

|
Date: 08/17/11 10:30:57 AM]
Dude, you say you have 20 years in IT and you talk about Paint when it comes to the size of installation disc of Win7? Get real, without Paint you can not use PrintScreen, something any OS has ''out of the box”.
If you complain about the size of the files, you should say about Language packs (around 1GB, only 300MB is for support for Chinese traditional and Chinese simplified) and after a new installation you still have to install some extra files for your language. You should say also for the ~600MB of files for Tablet PC interoperability (or something like that). You should say about the hundreds of MB for speech recognition. What about the idiotic bundle of printer drivers that actually do not work all the time? And guess what? You can not remove them even if you will use the drivers that came with the printer.
Another huge chunk (600 or 700MB, if I remember correctly) of the disc is occupied my the Media Center and Windows Media Player. Why should this be installed if I do not use my desktop as a Home Cinema?
All the Windows discs are full of garbage and you can not get the basics at a cheaper price because you loose also some functionality. Stupid model of business. If Win 8 will fallow the same trend, BSD and Linux will get bigger share of the home user market. Not because is smaller, but because it lets customize according to your needs and also you do not have sooooooo maaaaaany security holes.
There are of course also some basic function that can be added to the system. One of this would be to be able to recognize other file system, not to use them, but just to be able to recognize them. Now if you go in Computer Management, all ext3,ext4, btrfs, ufs, zfs etc. will appear as HEALTHY. Most of this file systems are open source and the basic support can be added. This denial of the others is just not “healthy” as they say.
And because I mentioned about other OS, this something that is eating on all those that have above 2 OS, MICROSOFT FIX YOUR STUPID BOOT MANAGER, every time you repair or install Windows (XP, Vista or 7) you have to recover the boot manager of you normally use together with the other OS installed on your drives.
One big problem that hit the users with Win7 was the driver signature. Why should a small programmer pay to Microsoft to get signature on a small utility program(ATI TrayTools users understand this)? You have to to use some unorthodox ways to bypass this signature. Only to make some extra money, after they charge the user with a hefty price for the OS. And they keep wondering why the pirated copies of Windows are popular.
1
0
[
Posted by: Sorinux

|
Date: 08/17/11 09:01:29 PM]
3.
It will only be revolutionary for tablets and touchscreen computers (correct me if I'm wrong and touchscreen-less computers can utilize the new UI). For the conventional laptop or desktop setup it will feel the same. The regular Windows UI looks exactly like Windows 7 while the tablet portion looks like a blown-up Windows Phone 7. It might introduce new features for conventional computers, but they better be convincing enough for me to upgrade.
2
0
[
Posted by: DirectXtreme

|
Date: 08/16/11 11:52:10 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
I thought of it only being an improvement for touch screens too, but it actually brings in a new interface that can work well with the Kbd/Mouse too.
All the "Tiles" in the image are actually applications that can be interacted with. The closest you can get to this on windows is to manually open a bunch of applications and resize the windows in a similar fashion. Even with that method, the information present isn't going to be organized and summarized - which is what the new interface is going to bring.
The new interface is built to have all the info you need all in one go, minimizing the needs to actually launch an application. And if you do need to - it will be easy. Its an excellent new direction for a desktop/home screen.
However, I hope this isn't the first direction towards removing the Window based model for applications. I like the abilty to resize windows and simple window switching/task switching in the current OS.
0
0
[
Posted by: MonkRX

|
Date: 08/20/11 01:34:09 AM]
4.
Revolutionary yet MS says it will have basicly the same functions and look as Windows 7. Ok.... Where did i hear this revolutionary rant before from MS.... Oh yeah! Windows Vista. Which was revolutionary in the way of how fast people downgraded back to XP.
4
1
[
Posted by: SteelCity1981

|
Date: 08/17/11 01:36:07 AM]
5.
If it can boot in less than 10 seconds, I will consider it..."revolutionary". Until then......
0
0
[
Posted by: TAViX

|
Date: 08/18/11 12:58:29 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
In fact... it can. Windows 8 Developer Preview on my i3-2310m laptop boots in literally 5 secs (on a WD Scorpio Blue 500GB HDD) after BIOS. I do not know what Microsoft did to that - maybe the hybrid boot technology - but that is epic. The uptime says 10h though, but I have tried removing the battery, HDD, and RAM but it still boots insanely fast.
0
0
[
Posted by: Nightingale

|
Date: 09/16/11 08:09:58 AM]
6.
Microsoft is the American phoney commercial company that push total rubbish and rhetorically always market it as revolutionary. I remember the video clips in Windows 98, 2000, XP, and the advertizement texts in the installation screan, that can convince only the most ignorant consumers of its greatness. Windows has always been mass industrial and invasive to other industry, and louzy, unstable and styfling creativity like third-party product compatability or informal modding in its products. WinDOSE sucks, nobody wants, there is no alternative for games, so everybody must have it. And Microsoft keeps pushing this advertizement bullshit with a corporate distinction. I pitty those guys who have to work there and try to do voice acting in their commercials. It is all about profit and marketeering.
0
0
[
Posted by: TeemuMilto

|
Date: 09/14/11 03:48:50 AM]
[1-6]