News
 

Bookmark and Share

(4) 

A number of industry reports that emerged on Tuesday suggests that Intel Corp. intends to slowdown aggressive expansion of manufacturing capacities by upgrading fabs next year due to slower than expected growth of demand towards various chips. In particular, there are indicators that Intel may reduce capital expenditures in 2012 and/or 2013.

Earlier this year the world's largest maker of chips announced aggressive plan to transit five of its fabs to 22nm process technology in 2011 - 2012 timeframe. In particular, the company is looking forward to upgrade its D1D (Oregon), D1C (Oregon), Fab 13 (Arizona), Fab 32 (Arizona) and Fab 28 (Israel) production facilities to the new manufacturing process. Some financial analysts believed that Intel also intended to convert its Fab 24 in Leixlip, Irelan, to the new process technology in 2012 - 2013 timeframe. However, Intel seems to have delayed the plan and will only convert the fab to 10nm or 14nm fabrication processes.

"Our industry checks suggest Intel has decided to remove Fab 24 (Ireland) from its 1270 (22nm) roadmap. What is unclear to us is whether Intel will re-allocate capacity to Israel or other facilities or whether this is a cut to capex," analyst C.J. Muse with Barclays Capital wrote in a research note, reports Tech Trader Daily.

Although the plans to upgrade the Fab 24 to 22nm have never been made public, it is logical for Intel to improve the 300mm factory that makes chips using 90nm and 65nm process technologies.

"Our checks indicate that INTC has changed its plan on its Fab 24 in Ireland, putting on hold the upgrade of the fab from 90/65nm to 22nm. It plans to revisit the future of Fab 24 at 14nm or 10nm node. Contrary to what was stated by at least one competitor, there are no pushouts of already ordered tools associated with this decision. In other words, it doesn’t impact current orders/shipments but rather, the impact relates more to what INTC will spend in 2012," wrote Timothy Arcuri from Citigroup.

Although reduction of spending by Intel means lower sales of semiconductor production equipment in 2012, it does not mean that Intel is likely to run into any capacity-related problems with 22nm thanks to five fabs (a record number of leading-edge fabs for Intel) and slowing demand. In generally, changes of upgrade plans of one fab mean that Intel will have to reconsider its future strategy a bit.

Given the fact that Intel has been posting excellent financial results recently, the change of the intentions came due to potential lack of incentives from the government of Ireland.

Intel did not comment on the story.

Tags: Intel, Semiconductor, 22nm, 300mm

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 08/30/11 06:52:37 PM
Latest comment: 08/31/11 01:19:20 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-2]

1. 
meh, they make squillians and still want a hand out from the government to upgrade its foundries... thats big corperate business for you.
0 0 [Posted by: vid_ghost  | Date: 08/30/11 06:52:37 PM]
Reply

2. 
Ofcourse they're not upgrading their fabs as fast - they won't until they have genuine competition. It's only worth them innovating if someone else might catch up, but they are years ahead in fab technology already. Corporate interest != consumer interest. Markets only drive innovation where there is competition.
0 0 [Posted by: Prosthetic_Head  | Date: 08/31/11 02:14:09 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
actually there arn't so many year before the rest 1 year maybe. GF already has 28 nm (BULK) and TSCM is also at 28nm while intel is still at 32nm(BULK)
and GF 32nm is different its SOI it preforms better than BULK. but it is abit slower in devolpment. if GF goos FDSOI(and maybe 3D) next than they will be better than intel
0 0 [Posted by: massau  | Date: 08/31/11 03:00:05 AM]
Reply
 
Show me a shipping 28nm product from GF or TSMC and I'll believe you. Both of those foundaries are working on that node, but have yet to ship. TSMC is slated to ship ship their first 28nm planar products in Q4'11, right around when Intel ships their first 22nm tri-gate products. GF is even further behind.

There's no doubt here that Intel has the process edge and will keep driving it. Intel's decision on whether to upgrade a SIXTH 300mm fab to 22nm has nothing to do product or process innovation and everything to do with economic conditions and market demand.
0 0 [Posted by: whisper19  | Date: 08/31/11 01:19:20 PM]
Reply

[1-2]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

8:52 pm | Lisa Su Appointed as New CEO of Advanced Micro Devices. Rory Read Steps Down, Lisa Su Becomes New CEO of AMD

Thursday, August 28, 2014

12:22 pm | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

9:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

6:41 pm | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture

Monday, August 25, 2014

6:05 pm | Chinese Inspur to Sell Mission-Critical Servers with AMD Software, Power 8 Processors. IBM to Enter Chinese Big Data Market with the Help from Inspur