News
 

Bookmark and Share

(6) 

The five most prevalent types of semiconductors reported as counterfeits that have widespread commercial and military use represent $169 billion in potential annual risk for the global electronics supply chain, according to information and analytics provider IHS. Nobody can credibly estimate the worth of the counterfeit semiconductor market, but it is easy to guess that it is a multi-billion dollar business.

“There has been a great deal of focus on the issue of counterfeit parts in the defense industry, but the majority of reported counterfeit incidents are for commercial components which have broad use across both military and commercial applications,” said Rory King, director, supply chain product marketing at IHS.

The five most commonly counterfeited semiconductor types are analog integrated circuits (ICs), microprocessors, memory ICs, programmable logic devices and transistors, based on data from IHS. Together, these five component commodity groups accounted for slightly more than two-thirds of all counterfeit incidents reported in 2011.

Looking across the entire industry, the sum total of the application markets where these five most reported commodity groups are used represented $169 billion worth of semiconductor revenue in 2011, according to data derived from the IHS iSuppli. These commodities are used widely throughout all major semiconductor applications, i.e., computing, consumer electronics, wireless and wired communications, automotive and industrial.

As IHS recently noted, 2011 was a record year for counterfeit reporting, and incidents of counterfeit parts have tripled during the past two years. Counterfeit parts often are cheap substitutes or salvaged waste components that fail to meet quality requirements, leading to potential failures.

“Take analog ICs, for example. One out of every four counterfeit parts reported are for analog ICs - components which are used in everything from industrial and automotive situations to wireless devices, computers, or consumer electronics. A single counterfeit could impact end products in any of these markets and the potential problem is pervasive, amounting to billions of dollars of global product revenue subject to risk,” added Mr. King.

According to the IHS iSuppli, the total global analog IC market was worth $47.7 billion in 2011. These components are critical to all major application markets, evident in the sales%age taken by analog ICs in individual segments. For example, the wireless market generated 29% of global analog IC sales in 2011, amounting to $13.8 billion in revenue. 

The problem is almost as massive in the other market application markets. The consumer electronics segment in 2011 consumed $9.8 billion worth of analog ICs, or 21% of the global market. Automotive electronics amounted to $8 billion, or 17%; computing represented $6.7 billion, or 14%; industrial electronics was at $6.5 billion, or 14%; and wired communications was $2.9 billion, or 6%.

“A faulty counterfeit analog IC can cause problems ranging from a mundane dropped phone call to a serious tragedy in the aviation, medical, military, nuclear or automotive areas. Furthermore, the excessive cost of rework, repair, and customer returns for component failures is significant. For the global electronics supply chain, tackling the problem of counterfeit and fraudulent components has become an issue of paramount importance,” noted Mr. King.

For many organizations, addressing the costs and risks associated with counterfeits is not just important, it’s also regulated. On December 31, 2011, the U.S. president Barrack Obama signed the H.R.1540: national defense authorization act for fiscal year 2012. The act mandates that participants at all tiers of its global defense supply chain implement processes and systems to analyze, assess and act on counterfeit and suspect counterfeit electronic parts.

While the top five most counterfeit or fraudulent parts represent a major portion of the counterfeit problem, multiple other types of devices also are vulnerable to counterfeiting and fraud. In all, IHS has data for more than 100 types of integrated circuits, passive components, electro-mechanical devices, and other parts with counterfeit incidents reported against them.

“The industrial segment, which includes both military and aerospace devices as well as medical components, is a relatively minor consumer of the most prevalent parts that are counterfeited. However, a failure of a substandard counterfeit component in this area can have catastrophic consequences,” King said. “Organizations can use the reports of counterfeit incidents reported by others, in order to be proactively alerted of actual problematic parts in circulation throughout the supply chain. This can help organizations to avoid, quarantine, or act upon counterfeits in time,” concluded the analyst.

Tags: Semiconductor, Business

Discussion

Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 04/08/12 10:21:45 AM
Latest comment: 04/19/12 11:04:53 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-3]

1. 
Well there is none but only one culprit... CHINA!!!
0 1 [Posted by: pogsnet  | Date: 04/08/12 10:21:45 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Not by default, but Asia in general has horrid counterfeit protection and anti-counterfeit laws so many business use pirated software as a legitimate business practice
0 1 [Posted by: veli05  | Date: 04/09/12 06:48:08 AM]
Reply

2. 
Hate to be the grammar nazi but there's a "bullion" in the subtitle Made me laugh out loud, though so - good one
2 0 [Posted by: MyK  | Date: 04/09/12 08:31:18 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
yeah, its called planting ideas into ones head (aka buy gold & silver bullion b4 the dollar collapses)

Edit; sarcasm
1 1 [Posted by: keysplayer  | Date: 04/09/12 03:09:58 PM]
Reply

3. 
I have to wonder...How does one produce FAKE chips???
0 0 [Posted by: TAViX  | Date: 04/11/12 04:34:05 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Two ways really. First and most obvious would be reverse-engineering and manufacturing at a non-sanctioned facility (like printing your own dollar bills) and the other way would be failing to report real manufactured numbers to rights holders (like e.g. tax fraud). Of course it gets more complicated and involves way more crimes than just one of these two to also distribute such chips and profit from it, but in essence, that's pretty much it. In times, we've also seen the third, less frequent now, way of "faking" chips that would involve claiming certain non-critical parts of a device to be of better nominal quality than they really are, or even not working at all and were never intended to (blanks or duds? LOL). This latter is now completely legal and we call it "marketing".
0 0 [Posted by: MyK  | Date: 04/19/12 11:04:53 AM]
Reply

[1-3]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Monday, July 21, 2014

12:56 pm | Microsoft to Fire 18,000 Employees to Boost Efficiency. Microsoft to Perform Massive Job Cut Ever Following Acquisition of Nokia

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

6:11 am | Apple Teams Up with IBM to Make iPhone and iPad Ultimate Tools for Businesses and Enterprises. IBM to Sell Business-Optimized iPhone and iPad Devices

Monday, July 14, 2014

6:01 am | IBM to Invest $3 Billion In Research of Next-Gen Chips, Process Technologies. IBM to Fund Development of 7nm and Below Process Technologies, Help to Create Post-Silicon Future

5:58 am | Intel Postpones Launch of High-End “Broadwell-K” Processors to July – September, 2015. High-End Core i “Broadwell” Processors Scheduled to Arrive in Q3 2015

5:50 am | Intel Delays Introduction of Core M “Broadwell” Processors Further. Low-Power Broadwell Chips Due in Late 2014