News
 

Bookmark and Share

(4) 

Intel Corp. considers its own leading-edge manufacturing facilities as a major advantage for itself as they allow to earn high margins, so in case Intel can fill its fabs with its own products, it would barely pursue contract manufacturing opportunities. Nonetheless, the company does not rule out foundry business prospects and will make some chips for others. Still, Intel is unlikely to build commodity chips, such as Qualcomm's, but would produce SoCs for Apple.

"The business model that we have today is one that I am extremely comfortable with and we are working as hard as possible to maintain. [...] As compared to other non-integrated device manufacturers, we get paid twice for our products: we get paid the equivalent of a foundry margin and we get paid the equivalent of an architectural margin and that allows us to generate fairly nice margins. So as long as we can fill up all of the factories we can build with Intel products at those kinds of rewards in terms of the ROI, that makes the most sense for us," said Paul Otellini, chief executive officer of Intel, during quarterly conference call with financial analysts.

Intel established its Intel Custom Foundry division within its technology and manufacturing group about two years ago, but it remains extremely tight-lipped about its ongoing endeavors, future plans, prospects and clients. Being the largest maker of semiconductors in the world, Intel has leading-edge process technologies and invests more than anyone else in research and development (R&D) of new manufacturing processes as well as building new manufacturing facilities. Since it every new technology node costs more than the previous one and the cost of new fabs is growing as well (and with 450mm factories their cost wil get even higher), Intel needs to constantly sell more chips and ensure full utilization of its factories. One of the ways to guarantee maximum utilization of production facilities is to make chips for others.

"Are there opportunities out in time to take advantage of the lead that we're building in areas like foundry? Yes. You havve seen some small announcements to that effect, where we have signed up some companies for some foundry activity over the next several years. I would look at those, and I would ask you to look at those as being learning experiences for us. [...] It is for profit [now]. In terms of where it goes long term, I will leave that point open," said the head of Intel.

According to Intel, its foundry contracts allow it to build the libraries and tools that are useful for the company's own system-on-chip (SoC) business. Naturally, the same capabilities improve Intel's positions on the foundry market. Moreover, in case it needs, eventually it will be able to integrate third-party intellectual property (IP) into its custom chips for special clients. For now, the company would prefer making SoCs for its customers, such as Apple, rather than for makers of commodity chips, such as Qualcomm.

"Anything is theoretically possible. [...] The Apple [foundry contract] win would be a lot more attractive than the Qualcomm win," said Mr. Otellini.

Tags: Intel, Semiconductor, 22nm, 14nm, TSMC, UMC, Globalfoundries

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 04/18/12 02:01:03 PM
Latest comment: 04/19/12 01:57:58 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-3]

1. 
It's almost inevitable that Intel will become a leading foundry. The development costs are fixed, so the more fabs you having sharing it, the lower the cost per. Intel is the best, and there's a huge market for their foundries. There are so many items that do not compete with Intel's own products they could make, and profitably, it's a lower margin, but high volume business. Because they are the best, they could charge more too, so the margins would not be that small. On top of all this, it could improve their relationships with OEMs if they build not only the Intel products for them, but also chips using someone else's intellectual property.

All the way around, it makes way too much sense not to happen.
0 2 [Posted by: TA152H  | Date: 04/18/12 08:38:23 PM]
Reply

2. 
Because they are the best, they could charge more too, so the margins would not be that small.


They could but they won't. the consumer market already recognizes intel products as the more expensive option. So raising prices of their products would just be shooting themselves in the foot.

On top of all this, it could improve their relationships with OEMs if they build not only the Intel products for them, but also chips using someone else's intellectual property.


Wut? You cannot make stuff off other companies intellectual property without drastic consequences. I understand what you are saying but I believe the OEM contracts don't just rake in money for Intel alone and are most likely way more complicated than that.
0 2 [Posted by: veli05  | Date: 04/19/12 06:35:15 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
I'm pretty sure you misunderstood what I said.

Intel could charge more for their foundry services than a lesser maker like TSMC and Global Foundries. You don't think AMD and NVIDIA wouldn't pay a bit more for their higher end discrete cards if they were getting a benefit from it?

That other part, I meant, let's say Apple is using Intel for Intel products. Now Apple also has some of their own chips they need made. They could use Intel for that. The consequences are a better relationship.
0 0 [Posted by: TA152H  | Date: 04/19/12 01:57:58 PM]
Reply

3. 
"As compared to other non-integrated device manufacturers, we get paid twice for our products: we get paid the equivalent of a foundry margin and we get paid the equivalent of an architectural margin and that allows us to generate fairly nice margins".

Life is good when you're the CEO of a monopoly, right Paul?
1 2 [Posted by: Iceman  | Date: 04/19/12 10:14:34 AM]
Reply

[1-3]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

8:52 pm | Lisa Su Appointed as New CEO of Advanced Micro Devices. Rory Read Steps Down, Lisa Su Becomes New CEO of AMD

Thursday, August 28, 2014

12:22 pm | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

9:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

6:41 pm | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture

Monday, August 25, 2014

6:05 pm | Chinese Inspur to Sell Mission-Critical Servers with AMD Software, Power 8 Processors. IBM to Enter Chinese Big Data Market with the Help from Inspur