Bookmark and Share


Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company announced last week that given the current market trends, it would have a number of very large customers and it would eventually make sense to dedicated a whole semiconductor manufacturing facility to each of those big clients. The announcement potentially means a significant change for the business of contract makers of semiconductors.

It is not a secret that there a number of fabless companies like Apple, Nvidia, Qualcomm and some others, who sell hundreds of millions of chips every year and who are growing rather quickly. For such companies, any hassles with abilities of contract semiconductor makers like TSMC to supply means slowdown to their growth as well as drop of profitability since chips tend to get more affordable every month due to competition. At the same time, those companies will unlikely build their own fabs since they will have to develop process technologies themselves and invest massive amounts of capital into maintenance of  the fabs. For such companies, TSMC plans to propose a different business model: dedicated factories.

"I think that it is an almost natural outcome the way market is trending [to dedicate certain amounts of capacities to particular clients]. I think that they are going to be larger customers, and now it makes complete sense to dedicate a whole fab to just one customer and hold [this fab] for just one customer. Now remember, we made our mark in serving many customers. In fact, that is a really part of our secret sauce of success: the ability to serve many customers to their satisfaction. We will still retain that capability, but there are customers that are getting bigger and bigger. So it makes sense that we dedicate a whole fab or even more than a whole fab to just one customer," said Morris Chang, chief executive officer of TSMC, during a recent conference call with financial analysts.

It is clear that building and owning a semiconductor manufacturing facility requires a lot of capital and expertise. With a cost of a 450mm semi factory being around $10 billion, even large companies may not be interested in owning such a fab. At the same time, TSMC may provide industry-standard process technologies tailored for a particular customer, high-volume manufacturing, flawless operation along with abilities to quickly solve problems and provide necessary services cost-effectively. Basically, TSMC wants to propose a new foundry model: customers will not buy chips or wafers, but rather wafers along with factory time. Ultimately, fabless makers of semiconductors may even pay part of the foundry's capital expenditures to speed up ramp up or time to market.

But before proceeding to a new foundry business model TSMC will attempt to centralize manufacturing of different devices as much as possible in order to be able to quickly resolve all the possible issues. TSMC's fabs in Taichung will produce various products using 28nm fabrication process, whereas fabs in Tainan will be dedicated to 20nm and 16nm FinFET manufacturing.

Tags: TSMC, Semiconductor, Apple, Nvidia, Qualcomm, 20nm, 16nm, 28nm, FinFET


Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 07/25/12 05:42:37 AM
Latest comment: 07/25/12 02:02:08 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads


This idea really depends on the contracted volume/time span as it's pretty difficult and expensive to function with just one customer per Fab. This approach would mean either less TSMC customers or a need for several more Fabs at a huge expense in addition to construction and ramping time.
0 0 [Posted by: beenthere  | Date: 07/25/12 05:42:37 AM]
- collapse thread

Unless, like TSMC execs are suggesting, their big clients have statistically shown over a period of time that they have the demand and volume capabilities to warrant dedicated use of an entire fab to themselves at peak efficiency. Which is really the entire point of the article, stating that it could be a possibility, I would assume they would not make this claim without taking into account their clients volume and demand tendencies
0 0 [Posted by: veli05  | Date: 07/25/12 05:54:37 AM]
I think this more has to do with them not wanting to take the risk with customers who want to only pay per succesful wafer/die. Charging them for the time of the whole fab would lower TSMC's risk when they are having yield issues.

In regards to how many fabs they would need, these might be just seperate clean rooms production lines within the same fab/location, such like global foundaries dresden location has around 4 different sections which are upgraded at different times.

If i were an chip designer/ fab customer i would probably not be intersted in this route, as they are trying to get you to pay for failed wafers and the prices will go up if there is any down time, a large reason why contract fabs are succesful is that they can do other companies wafers, when one company has less demand, vs having a factory sit idle cause 1 company has a bad product that year.
0 0 [Posted by: cashkennedy  | Date: 07/25/12 02:02:08 PM]


Add your Comment

Related news

Latest News

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

10:48 pm | LG’s Unique Ultra-Wide Curved 34” Display Finally Hits the Market. LG 34UC97 Available in the U.S. and the U.K.

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

12:52 pm | Lisa Su Appointed as New CEO of Advanced Micro Devices. Rory Read Steps Down, Lisa Su Becomes New CEO of AMD

Thursday, August 28, 2014

4:22 am | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

1:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

10:41 am | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture