News
 

Bookmark and Share

(3) 

 

Intel Corp. confirmed during the conference call with financial analysts on Thursday that it is on track to begin making chips using 14nm process technology later this year. The company already started to assign space and equipment for 14nm product lines back in the fourth quarter of 2012 and is confident about its plans.

“We will begin our transition to 14nm as we begin the world's first 14 nanometer products towards the end of this year,” said Paul Otellini, chief executive officer of Intel, who is planning to retire in May.

Stacy Smith, the chief financial officer of the company, added that Intel started to “to redirect fab space and equipment to 14nm” back in Q4 2012 and that Intel is on-track to “start production on the 14nm process this year”. The CFO of the company did not elaborate which fabs are set to produce 14nm chips code-named Broadwell later this year.

In mid-2012 Intel announced that its Fab D1X in Oregon, Fab 42 in Arizona and Fab 24 in Ireland will be converted to make 14nm chips. Later on, the situation with the Fab 24’s upgrade got unclear due to market rumours, but Intel did not make any official statements.

Originally, Intel referred to its current 14nm process technology as to 16nm since "16 nm" term firstly came from the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS). Nowadays Intel and other companies, including Globalfoundries and Samsung, are working on 14nm fabrication technologies for next-generation chips.

Tags: Intel, 14nm, 300mm, Core, Broadwell, Semiconductor

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 01/19/13 03:22:14 AM
Latest comment: 01/19/13 05:56:55 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-2]

1. 
So is 14nm actually smaller than 16nm or is just marketing kind of like 2x nm SSDs?
1 0 [Posted by: danwat1234  | Date: 01/19/13 03:22:14 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
It is marketing, some engineers measured intel's current "22nm" process, and it is "only" "26nm". Lots of marketing involved... as usual nowadays.

For 14nm I expect the same. They won't change any process parameters, just the name is changed.
2 0 [Posted by: Bingle  | Date: 01/19/13 05:23:39 AM]
Reply

2. 
Wait 13w is really 7w in Intel speak... What a bunch of clowns Intel has for maanagement. AnandTech caught them in their lies.

http://semiaccurate.com/2...efully-decieptful-at-ces/

If Intel's 14nm node, (aka as 18nm node), is as poor as their 22nm node (actually 26nm), Intel will be lucky to net anything other than some power reduction.
1 1 [Posted by: beenthere  | Date: 01/19/13 05:56:55 PM]
Reply

[1-2]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones

Monday, July 21, 2014

10:32 pm | PQI Debuts Flash Drive with Lightning and USB Connectors. PQI Offers Easy Way to Boost iPhone or iPad Storage

10:08 pm | Japan Display Begins to Mass Produce IPS-NEO Displays. JDI Begins to Mass Produce Rival for AMOLED Panels

12:56 pm | Microsoft to Fire 18,000 Employees to Boost Efficiency. Microsoft to Perform Massive Job Cut Ever Following Acquisition of Nokia