News
 

Bookmark and Share

(3) 

 

Intel Corp. confirmed during the conference call with financial analysts on Thursday that it is on track to begin making chips using 14nm process technology later this year. The company already started to assign space and equipment for 14nm product lines back in the fourth quarter of 2012 and is confident about its plans.

“We will begin our transition to 14nm as we begin the world's first 14 nanometer products towards the end of this year,” said Paul Otellini, chief executive officer of Intel, who is planning to retire in May.

Stacy Smith, the chief financial officer of the company, added that Intel started to “to redirect fab space and equipment to 14nm” back in Q4 2012 and that Intel is on-track to “start production on the 14nm process this year”. The CFO of the company did not elaborate which fabs are set to produce 14nm chips code-named Broadwell later this year.

In mid-2012 Intel announced that its Fab D1X in Oregon, Fab 42 in Arizona and Fab 24 in Ireland will be converted to make 14nm chips. Later on, the situation with the Fab 24’s upgrade got unclear due to market rumours, but Intel did not make any official statements.

Originally, Intel referred to its current 14nm process technology as to 16nm since "16 nm" term firstly came from the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS). Nowadays Intel and other companies, including Globalfoundries and Samsung, are working on 14nm fabrication technologies for next-generation chips.

Tags: Intel, 14nm, 300mm, Core, Broadwell, Semiconductor

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 01/19/13 03:22:14 AM
Latest comment: 01/19/13 05:56:55 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-2]

1. 
So is 14nm actually smaller than 16nm or is just marketing kind of like 2x nm SSDs?
1 0 [Posted by: danwat1234  | Date: 01/19/13 03:22:14 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
It is marketing, some engineers measured intel's current "22nm" process, and it is "only" "26nm". Lots of marketing involved... as usual nowadays.

For 14nm I expect the same. They won't change any process parameters, just the name is changed.
2 0 [Posted by: Bingle  | Date: 01/19/13 05:23:39 AM]
Reply

2. 
Wait 13w is really 7w in Intel speak... What a bunch of clowns Intel has for maanagement. AnandTech caught them in their lies.

http://semiaccurate.com/2...efully-decieptful-at-ces/

If Intel's 14nm node, (aka as 18nm node), is as poor as their 22nm node (actually 26nm), Intel will be lucky to net anything other than some power reduction.
1 1 [Posted by: beenthere  | Date: 01/19/13 05:56:55 PM]
Reply

[1-2]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Thursday, August 28, 2014

12:22 pm | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

9:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

6:41 pm | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture

Monday, August 25, 2014

6:05 pm | Chinese Inspur to Sell Mission-Critical Servers with AMD Software, Power 8 Processors. IBM to Enter Chinese Big Data Market with the Help from Inspur

Sunday, August 24, 2014

6:12 pm | Former X-Bit Labs Editor Aims to Wed Tabletop Games with Mobile Platforms. Game Master Wants to Become a New World of Warcraft